Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer

June 14, 2017 updated by: Peter Choyke, M.D., National Cancer Institute (NCI)

A Pilot Study of 11C-Acetate Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and 3 Telsa Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Prostatectomy

Background:

  • Prostate cancers are difficult to see on most imaging studies such as X-rays, computed tomography (CT) scans, conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and conventional positron emission tomography (PET) scans.
  • An experimental radioactive tracer called 11C-acetate accumulates in prostate tumor cells and may help find prostate cancers more accurately than other imaging methods.

Objectives:

  • To determine the accuracy of prostate tumor imaging using the tracer 11C-acetate.

Eligibility:

  • Patients 18 years of age and older who are undergoing surgery for localized prostate cancer at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center.

Design:

  • Patients have a positron emission tomography (PET scan). For this test, an intravenous (IV) line is placed in the patient's arm and the patient lies on a table inside the donut shaped scanner. (11)C-acetate is injected into the vein through the catheter and images of the lower pelvis and abdomen are obtained over 30 minutes.
  • Patients have an endorectal coil MRI scan. For this test, a tube is placed in the rectum, just behind the prostate, to increase the amount of signal received by the magnetic resonance (MR) unit. Other coils may be wrapped around the pelvis to further improve the quality of the scan. The patient lies on the scanning table for about 75 to 90 minutes while images are obtained. During the scan, a contrast agent called gadolinium is injected through an intravenous (IV) line to brighten the images.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background:

  • Accurate localization of prostate cancer (PC) is important in developing targeted minimally invasive therapies. While T2 weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy imaging performed at 3T is a useful technique for localizing prostate cancer, it has limitations both in sensitivity and specificity.
  • Positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals are more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of cancers; however, the resolution of PET is inferior to MRI. Therefore, a combined PET/MR approach might be desirable.
  • We propose to evaluate the utility of a PET radiopharmaceutical, (11C) acetate ((11C)AC) for the detection of PC within the prostate and compare its distribution with T2 weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and MR spectroscopy imaging preformed at 3T.
  • Unlike fludeoxyglucose F18(18F)FDG, a routinely used PET radiopharmaceutical which is excreted by the urinary system and accumulates in the bladder, limiting its utility in pelvic imaging, (11C)AC has low physiologic distribution in the pelvis. Several studies involving small numbers of patients have demonstrated that (11C)AC PET imaging can localize in pelvic nodes involved with prostate cancer (PC).
  • Dynamic (11C)AC PET/CT examination will be performed in patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer (estimated enrollment 40) who will also undergo prostate/pelvic 3T endorectal coil MR/magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) followed by surgical resection (+/- pelvic lymphadenectomy).
  • Histological comparison with the PET/CT and MRI results will be conducted. This study of (11C)AC in PC will permit the direct comparison of MR/MRSI and (11C)AC PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer within the prostate.

Objectives:

Primary Objective:

- To compare the biodistribution of (11C) acetate ((11C)AC) PET/CT imaging in tumor and non-tumorous regions of the prostate in patients with known prostate cancer.

Secondary Objective:

  • To examine the diagnostic accuracy of the standardized uptake value (SUV) of (11C)AC obtained using PET/CT imaging for detecting region (sextant)-specific malignancy using receiver operating curves (ROC).
  • To examine whether pelvic biodistribution of (11C)AC PET/CT imaging predicts sextant-specific malignancy better than T2 weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and MR spectroscopy (MRS) imaging performed at 3T.
  • To evaluate for potential physiological effects of (11C)AC
  • To correlate the intensity of (11C)AC uptake with histopathologic Gleason Grade
  • Tabulate the incidence of extraprostatic lesions accumulating(11C)AC PET/CT detection which are suspicious for extraprostatic disease by comparing suspicious lesions on (11C)AC PET/CT with standard of care diagnostic imaging modalities, additional biopsy results, or clinical follow-up performed at the discretion of the referring physician.

Eligibility:

  • Participants must be scheduled to undergo standard of care prostatectomy for presumed localized prostate cancer at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center.
  • Recent (within 12 months of study entry) biopsy indicating the presence of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland
  • Participant must be 18 years or older
  • Serum creatinine within 1 week prior to MR imaging less than or equal to 1.8mg/dl AND epidermal growth factor receptor (eGFR) must be greater than 30 ml/min/1.73m^2
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance score of 0 or 1
  • Participants may not have received androgen deprivation therapy or pelvic radiation therapy

Design:

  • Participants with prostate cancer scheduled for prostatectomy at the NIH Clinical Center will undergo 30-minute dynamic (11C)AC PET/CT imaging, and endorectal coil/pelvic T2 weighted, DCE, DWI, and MRS imaging performed at 3T.
  • We will accrue 40 participants to this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:
  • Participant must be scheduled to undergo standard of care prostatectomy for presumed localized prostate cancer at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center.
  • Recent (within 12 months of study entry) trans-rectal biopsy indicating the presence of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland in which at least sextant biopsies were obtained. Knowledge of the location of each specimen is required for inclusion.
  • Participant must be 18 years or older.
  • Serum creatinine within 1 week prior to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging less than or equal to 1.8mg/dl AND epidermal growth factor receptor (eGFR) must be greater than 30 ml/min/1.73 m^2
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance score of 0 or 1.
  • Ability to provide informed consent. All patients must sign a document of informed consent indicating their understanding of the investigational nature and risks of the study before any protocol related studies are performed.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Known allergy to gadolinium or acetate.
  • Participants for whom participating would significantly delay the scheduled standard of care therapy.
  • Participants with any coexisting medical or psychiatric condition that is likely to interfere with study procedures and/or results are excluded.
  • Participants with severe claustrophobia.
  • Patients with contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Patients weighing greater than 136 kg (weight limit for scanner table).
  • Patients with pacemakers, cerebral aneurysm clips, shrapnel injury, or other implanted electronic devices or metal not compatible with MRI.
  • Patients with contraindication to endorectal coil placement
  • Severe hemorrhoids.
  • Surgically absent rectum.
  • Other medical conditions deemed by the principal investigator (PI) or associates to make the patient ineligible for protocol procedures.
  • Patients who have previously received radiation therapy to the pelvis.
  • Patients who have received androgen deprivation therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 11C-acetate for Prostate Cancer Patients
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection
11C-acetate positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)for 30 minutes, intravenous bolus injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the Biodistribution of 11C-acetate Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging in Tumor and Non Tumorous Regions of the Prostate
Time Frame: 2 years
Standard uptake values (SUV) measurements of 11C-acetate will be obtained in each sextant (e.g. region) on each patient. Sextant-specific malignancy will be determined pathologically based on a subsequent prostatectomy. Initially, on each patient, we will, average SUV measurements in tumor and non-tumor regions (i.e., sextants with malignancy and no malignancy, respectively). The patient average SUV measurements across tumors and non-tumor regions will then be compared using a paired t-test.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Count of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 years
Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module.
2 years
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Standardized Uptake Value of [11C]AC Obtained Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) for Detecting Region (Sextant)-Specific Malignancy Using Receiver Operating Curves (ROC) for a Lesion >0.9cm
Time Frame: 2 years
The diagnostic accuracy of 11C-Acetate PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer was compared with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) using sector based analysis, generating receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves (plots of 1-specificity versus sensitivity) for both modalities.
2 years
Pelvic Biodistribution of [11C]AC Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Imaging
Time Frame: 2 years
Pelvic biodistribution was obtained for the prostate tumor, normal prostate and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Uptake is expressed in standardized uptake value (SUV).
2 years
Count of Participants With Physiological Effects of [11C]AC
Time Frame: 2 years
Buildup of positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals excreted by the urinary system can accumulate in the bladder and limit pelvic imaging. This effect contributes to low physiologic distribution in the pelvis.
2 years
Incidence of Extraprostatic Lesions Accumulating [11C]AC Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) Detection
Time Frame: 2 years
Suspicious lesions noted on biopsy were compared with standard care imaging diagnostic modalities, additional biopsies, and/or clinical follow up performed at the discretion of the referring physician.
2 years
Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) of Grouping Tumors Based on Gleason Score
Time Frame: 2 years
Intensity [11C]AC uptake with histopathologic Gleason grade were done with a Spearman rank correlation following prostatectomy. Two biopsies were performed and graded according to tumor pattern. The two grades were added together for a final Gleason score. Gleason score equal to or less than 3+4 is considered low risk. Gleason score equal to or greater than 4+3 is considered high-risk.
2 years
Lesion Based Sensitivity Analysis Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT), Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MP-MRI), Diffusion Weighted-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI), and DCE-MRI.
Time Frame: 2 years
PET/CT, MP-MRI, DW-MRI, and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) were used to detect lesion sensitivity.
2 years
11C-Acetate Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)Max and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels Using Spearman Correlation
Time Frame: 2 years
Tumor foci was histopathologically identified and tested to determine SUVmax relative to PSA levels. PSA normal range is 0-4ng/mL.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter L Choyke, M.D., National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on (C-11 Acetate)

Subscribe