A Study of Eliglustat Tartrate (Genz-112638) in Patients With Gaucher Disease Who Have Reached Therapeutic Goals With Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ENCORE) (ENCORE)

October 11, 2016 updated by: Genzyme, a Sanofi Company

A Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-Center, Multi-National, Open-Label, Active Comparator Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Genz-112638 in Patients With Gaucher Disease Type 1 Who Have Reached Therapeutic Goals With Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ENCORE)

This Phase 3 study was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of eliglustat tartrate (Genz-112638) in participants with Gaucher disease type 1 who had reached therapeutic goals with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Gaucher disease is characterized by lysosomal accumulation of glucosylceramide due to impaired glucosylceramide hydrolysis. Gaucher disease type 1, which is the most common form, accounts for greater than (>) 90% of cases and does not involve the central nervous system (CNS). Typical manifestations of Gaucher disease type 1 include splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, thrombocytopenia, anemia, bone disease, and decreased quality of life. The disease manifestations are caused by the accumulation of glucosylceramide (storage material) in macrophages (called Gaucher cells) which have infiltrated the spleen and liver as well as other tissues.

Eliglustat tartrate is a small molecule drug developed as an oral therapy which acts to specifically inhibit production of this storage material in Gaucher cells.

This study was designed to determine the efficacy, safety, and PK of eliglustat tartrate in adult participants with Gaucher disease type 1 who had been stabilized on ERT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital General de Agudos J.M Ramos Mejia
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Hospital General de Ninos Dr. Ricardo Gutierrez
      • Perth, WA, Australia
        • Royal Perth Hospital
      • Curitiba, Brazil
        • Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        • Instituto de Estadual de Hematologia Arthur de Siqueria Cavalcanti
      • São Paulo, Brazil
        • IGEIM
      • Toronto Ontario, Canada
        • Mount Sinai Hospital and the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Abou El Reesh Children's University Hospital (El Mounira), Faculty of Medicine (Kasr Al-Aini), Cairo University Hospitals, El Mounira, Cairo, Egypt
      • Clichy, France
        • Hôpital Beaujon
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
      • Oberhausen, Germany
        • Katholische Kliniken Oberhausen gem. GmbH
      • Firenze, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
      • Udine, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedialiero-Universitaria S. Maria Della Misericordia
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Hematology Research Center of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
      • Zaragoza, Spain
        • Hospital University Miguel Servet
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Cambridge University Hosptials, Addenbrookes Hospital
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States
        • Tower Hematology Oncology Medical Group
      • San Francisco, California, United States
        • UCSF MS Center
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States
        • University of Colorado Health Science Center - Aurora
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States
        • Yale University School of Medicine
    • Florida
      • Coral Springs, Florida, United States
        • Northwest Oncology Hematology Associates PA
    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States
        • Emory University Medical Genetics
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • Children's Memorial Hospital
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
        • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States
        • Albany Medical Center
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • North Shore University Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
      • New York, New York, United States
        • New York University School of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    • Virginia
      • Springfield, Virginia, United States
        • O and O Alpan LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant (and/or their parent/legal guardian) was willing and able to provide signed informed consent prior to any study-related procedures to be performed
  • The participant was at least 18 years old at the time of randomization
  • The participant had a confirmed diagnosis of Gaucher disease type 1
  • The participant had received treatment with ERT for at least 3 years. Within the 9 months prior to randomization, the participant had received a total monthly dose of 30 to 130 Units/kilogram for at least 6 months
  • The participant had reached Gaucher disease therapeutic goals prior to randomization
  • Female participants of childbearing potential must have had a documented negative pregnancy test prior to dosing. In addition, all female participants of childbearing potential must use a medically accepted form of contraception throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant had a partial or total splenectomy within 3 years prior to randomization
  • The participant had received substrate reduction therapies for Gaucher disease within 6 months prior to randomization
  • The participant had Gaucher disease type 2 or 3 or was suspected of having Gaucher disease type 3
  • The participant had any clinically significant disease, other than Gaucher disease, including cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal (GI), pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, metabolic (e.g. hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia), or psychiatric disease, other medical conditions, or serious intercurrent illnesses that may confound the study results or, in the opinion of the Investigator, may preclude participation in the study
  • The participant had tested positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody, Hepatitis C antibody, or Hepatitis B surface antigen
  • The participant had received an investigational product within 30 days prior to randomization
  • The participant was pregnant or lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Investigational
Eliglustat tartrate

Primary analysis period (PAP): Eliglustat tartrate capsule 50 milligram (mg) twice daily (BID) orally from Day 1 to Week 4 followed by eliglustat tartrate 50 mg or 100 mg capsule BID up to Week 8, and then eliglustat tartrate 50 mg or 100 mg or 150 mg capsule BID up to Week 52. Dose adjustments after Week 4 and Week 8 were based on Genz-99067 (active moiety of eliglustat tartrate in plasma) trough plasma concentrations. If Genz-99067 trough plasma concentration was less than (<) 5 nanogram per milliliter [ng/mL] next higher dose was administered whereas if Genz-99067 trough plasma concentration was greater than or equal to (>=) 5 ng/mL same dose was continued. Pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment at Week 2 and 6 were used for dose adjustment after Week 4 and Week 8, respectively.

Long-term treatment period (LTTP): Participants originally randomized to eliglustat in PAP continued to receive eliglustat dose, based on their Genz 99067 plasma trough concentration at Week 6.

Other Names:
  • Genz-112638
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Imiglucerase

PAP: Imiglucerase intravenous infusion every other week (q2w) up to Week 52 in doses equivalent to participant's past ERT dose prior to any unanticipated treatment interruption, dose reduction, or regimen change.

LTTP: Participants originally randomized to imiglucerase received eliglustat tartrate capsule 50 mg BID orally from Week 52+1 Day to Week 56 followed by eliglustat tartrate 50 mg or 100 mg capsule BID up to Week 60, and then eliglustat tartrate 50 mg or 100 mg or 150 mg capsule BID up to 5 years. The dose adjustments after Week 56 and Week 60 were based on Genz-99067 (active moiety of eliglustat tartrate in plasma) trough plasma concentrations. If Genz-99067 trough plasma concentration was <5 ng/mL the next higher dose was administered whereas if the Genz-99067 trough plasma concentration was >=5 ng/mL the same dose was continued. The PK assessment at Week 54 and Week 58 were used for dose adjustment after Week 56 and Week 60, respectively.

Other Names:
  • Cerezyme®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Remained Stable for 52 Weeks During the Primary Analysis Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52
For a participant to be classified as stable, the participant must have remained stable in hematological parameters (hemoglobin levels and platelet counts) and organ volumes (spleen, when applicable, and liver volumes in multiples of normal [MN]). Stable hematological parameters were defined as hemoglobin level did not decrease more than (>) 1.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL) from baseline and platelet count did not decrease >25% from baseline. Stable organ volumes were defined as spleen volume (in MN) did not increase >25% from baseline, if applicable, and liver volume (in MN) did not increase >20% from baseline.
Baseline up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Remained Stable Annually for 4 Years During the LTTP
Time Frame: Week 52 up to week 208
For a participant to be classified as stable, the participant must have remained stable in hematological parameters (hemoglobin levels and platelet counts) and organ volumes (spleen, when applicable, and liver volumes in MN). Stable hematological parameters were defined as hemoglobin level did not decrease >1.5 g/dL from baseline and platelet count did not decrease >25% from baseline. Stable organ volumes were defined as spleen volume (in MN) did not increase >25% from baseline, if applicable, and liver volume did not increase >20% from baseline.
Week 52 up to week 208

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline
Images of the spine and bilateral femur were obtained by dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA) to determine T-score for each bone area and total bone mineral density. T-score compares participant's bone density with that of healthy young participant. The T-score bone density categories are: normal (score greater than [>]-1), osteopenia (score -2.5 to less than or equal to [<=] -1), and osteoporosis (score <= -2.5).
Baseline
Absolute Change From Baseline in Total T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Images of the spine and bilateral femur were obtained by DXA to determine T-score for each bone area and total bone mineral density. T-score compares participant's bone density with that of healthy young participant. The T-score bone density categories are: normal (score >-1), osteopenia (score -2.5 to <=-1), and osteoporosis (score <= -2.5). Absolute change = T-score at Week 52 minus T-score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 52
Total Z-Scores for Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline
Images of the spine and bilateral femur were obtained by DXA to determine Z-score for each bone area and total bone mineral density. The Z-score bone density categories are: normal (score >-2) and below normal (score <=-2).
Baseline
Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Z-Scores for Bone Mineral Density at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Images of the spine and bilateral femur were obtained by DXA to determine Z-score for each bone area and total bone mineral density. The Z-score bone density categories are: normal (score >-2) and below normal (score <=-2). Absolute change = Z-score at Week 52 minus Z-score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 52
Hemoglobin Level
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Absolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Absolute change = hemoglobin level at Week 52 minus hemoglobin level at baseline.
Baseline, Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Platelet Counts at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent change in platelet counts = ([platelet count at Week 52 minus platelet count at baseline] divided by [platelet count at baseline]) multiplied by 100.
Baseline, Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume (MN) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent change in spleen volume = ([spleen volume at Week 52 minus spleen volume at baseline] divided by [spleen volume at baseline]) multiplied by 100, where all volumes are in MN.
Baseline, Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Liver Volume (in MN) at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent change in liver volume = ([liver volume at Week 52 minus liver volume at baseline] divided by [liver volume at baseline]) multiplied by 100, where all volumes are in multiples of normal.
Baseline, Week 52
Absolute Change From Baseline in Total T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density at Week 208
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 208
Images of the spine and bilateral femur were obtained by DXA to determine T-score for each bone area and total bone mineral density. T-score compares participant's bone density with that of healthy young participant. The T-score bone density categories are: normal (score >-1), osteopenia (score -2.5 to <=-1), and osteoporosis (score <= -2.5). Absolute change = T-score at Week 208 minus T-score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 208
Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Z-Scores for Bone Mineral Density at Week 208
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 208
Images of the spine and bilateral femur were obtained by DXA to determine Z-score for each bone area and total bone mineral density. The Z-score bone density categories are: normal (score >-2) and below normal (score <=-2). Absolute change = Z-score at Week 208 minus Z-score at baseline.
Baseline, Week 208
Absolute Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels at Week 208
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 208
Absolute change = hemoglobin level at Week 208 minus hemoglobin level at baseline.
Baseline, Week 208
Percent Change From Baseline in Platelet Counts at Week 208
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 208
Percent change in platelet counts = ([platelet count at Week 208 minus platelet count at baseline] divided by [platelet count at baseline]) multiplied by 100.
Baseline, Week 208
Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume (in MN) at Week 208
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 208
Percent change in spleen volume = ([spleen volume at Week 208 minus spleen volume at baseline] divided by [spleen volume at baseline]) multiplied by 100, where all volumes are in MN.
Baseline, Week 208
Percent Change From Baseline in Liver Volume (in MN) at Week 208
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 208
Percent change in liver volume = ([liver volume at Week 208 minus liver volume at baseline] divided by [liver volume at baseline]) multiplied by 100, where all volumes are in multiples of normal.
Baseline, Week 208

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 25, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gaucher Disease, Type 1

Clinical Trials on Eliglustat tartrate

Subscribe