Emergency Department Brief Intervention to Increase Carbon Monoxide Detector Use (ProjectCODE)

January 29, 2014 updated by: Lara McKenzie
Carbon Monoxide (CO) exposure kills and injures thousands of children and families each year. Although there is growing concern about the need to increase carbon monoxide detector use, little is known about how best to do so, especially for low-income families. The objective of this research is to determine whether a brief intervention, Project Carbon Monoxide Detector Education (Project CODE), will increase CO detector use. For this study, parents of children, 18 years or younger, will be randomly assigned to receive Project CODE (an educational tool and a CO detector) or usual care (a flyer on CO poisoning); both of which will be delivered in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) examination rooms. The use of a CO detector and the participant's current stage in the theory of stage-based behavior change-the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM), will be assessed at enrollment and then again at the home visits which will occur two-weeks and six-months following the PED visit. The investigators hypothesize that parents receiving Project CODE will have working CO detectors and will be further along in the PAPM than parents in the control group at the two-week and six-month home visits. The long term goal of this research is to reduce the number of injuries and deaths from CO poisoning.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Poisoning from Carbon Monoxide (CO) is among the leading causes of non-fatal injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments and accounts for approximately 500 unintentional deaths each year. Known effective countermeasures to detect CO and reduce CO poisoning exist, yet are not routinely utilized. Although there is increasing concern about the need to increase CO detector use, little is known about how best to do so, especially for low income families. This research aims to address this gap, by applying a theory of stage-based behavior change-the Precaution Adoption Process Model PAPM)-to a brief intervention feasible for a busy emergency department setting. A randomized trial will be conducted involving 300 families with children 18 years or younger. In the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED), eligible parents will randomly be assigned to receive the Project CODE intervention (an educational tool and a CO detector) or usual care (a flyer on CO poisoning). The use of a CO detector and participant's PAPM stage will be assessed at enrollment and again at follow-up home visits occurring two-weeks and six-months following the PED visit. We hypothesize that parents receiving Project CODE will have working CO detectors and will be further along in the PAPM than parents in the control group at a two-week and six-month follow-up home visits. By examining the extent to which the intervention increases CO detector use, these findings will also demonstrate how innovative health communications (brief interventions delivered in the PED) can reduce the risk of injuries among vulnerable children. This research builds on and extends the investigators' previous work on behavioral theory, injury prevention interventions delivered in the PED, and development and evaluation of interactive educational tools for safety practices. The specific aims of this project are as follows: Aim 1-Determine whether a brief intervention will increase CO detector use and PAPM stage among parents whose children are being seen in a PED compared to parents of children receiving routine care CO flyer; and Aim 2-Determine whether and to what extent socioeconomic status moderates the effect of the intervention. Findings from this research study will have both theoretical and practical applications for improving injury prevention services in PEDs. This single-site efficacy trial is the first step in determining whether a brief intervention in the PED will successfully increase CO detector use.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: The child being treated in the PED must be 18 years old or younger. The parent/guardian of the child being treated must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Current/Previous Enrollment: The participant must only enroll in the study once. A participant may not re-enroll in the study after completing any step of the study nor can they enroll as a result of an additional trip to the PED with the same child or a sibling of that child.
  • English speaking: Participants must feel comfortable answering survey questions that are written in English to be eligible for Project CODE.
  • Parent/Guardian: The parent/guardian is the actual study participant, not the child, even if the child is eighteen years-old. The child treated in the PED must be accompanied by an English-speaking adult and that adult must be the person responsible for ensuring the child's safety in his/her home. The child must live with the adult most of the time.
  • Reason for PED visit: Information regarding the nature of the child's visit will be obtained by reviewing PED triage information via EPIC and must be for an injury or a medical complaint.
  • Place of Residence: Study participants must live in Franklin County (Columbus, Ohio and surrounding area).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children being seen for possible sexual or physical abuse, neglect, behavioral problems, self inflicted harm or a suicide attempt.
  • Children that must see a doctor immediately or are presenting with a critical condition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Educational tool & Carbon Monoxide Alarm

Parents will be randomly assigned into a control and intervention group. Both groups will complete a computer based survey at enrollment and at their home visits occuring two weeks and approximately six months following enrollment. Participants will be given the following materials at enrollment.

Intervention:

  • Fast Facts about Carbon Monoxide Educational Tool
  • Kidde Nighthawk Carbon Monoxide Alarm

Control:

- Central Ohio Poison Control Center Flyer
Behavioral: Educational Tool & Carbon Monoxide Alarm
Based on the recommendations from the expert panel and focus group meetings, Fast Facts about Carbon Monoxide was developed to be an educational tool aimed at helping parents understand the dangers of CO and the need CO alarms in every home. In addition, this tool will help parents select and purchase the correct CO alarm, as well as properly install and maintain the alarm in their home. Each parent assigned to the intervention group will be given a Fast Facts about Carbon Monoxide educational tool and a Kidde Nighthawk Carbon Monoxide Alarm at enrollment.
Other Names:
  • Fast Facts about Carbon Monoxide Educational Tool

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Observation of working carbon monoxide alarms
Time Frame: Two-weeks and six-months following enrollment
Two-weeks and six-months following enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Behavioral profile and Precaution Adoption Process Model(PAPM)stage
Time Frame: Two-weeks and six-months following enrollment
Two-weeks and six-months following enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Lara McKenzie

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lara B. McKenzie, PhD, Center for Inury Research and Policy, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 14, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HD057155
  • Grant No.: R01HD057155

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intervention-carbon Monoxide Alarm + Educational Tool

Clinical Trials on Educational Tool & Carbon Monoxide Alarm

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Lithuania

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe