Comparison of Refined and Crude Indigo Naturalis Ointment in Treating Psoriasis

September 14, 2012 updated by: Yin-ku Lin

Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between Refined and Crude Indigo Naturalis Ointment in the Treatment of Psoriatic Vulgaris

To compare the efficacy and safety of refined indigo naturalis ointment with that of crude ointment in treating psoriasis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Our previous studies have shown that topical application of indigo naturalis significantly improves psoriatic symptoms. However, patient compliance is hindered because the preparation is unsightly and stains clothing.

To improve patient compliance, we have developed a refined formulation in which closer to natural skin tones and less prone to stain clothing. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of this refined form of oil extract ointment and compared the results with those of the original crude form of indigo naturalis ointment in treating psoriasis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Keelung, Taiwan, 204
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were had received a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis based on clinical assessment by two dermatologists at least a one year prior to entry into the study;
  • Patients had mild to moderate plaque psoriasis with bilateral symmetric lesions; were adults aged 20 to 65 years;
  • Patients were in good general health.
  • Female patients of childbearing age agreed to continue using birth control measures for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients had non-plaque (i.e., pustular, guttate, or erythrodermic) or drug-induced forms of psoriasis; total body surface involvement of more than 60%;
  • Patients had a history of allergy to indigo naturalis.
  • Patients were excluded if they have received systemic therapy within 4 weeks before enrollment, phototherapy within 3 weeks, or used topical psoriasis agents within 2 weeks before enrollment.
  • Patients had included usage of medications that affect psoriasis during the study and unwillingness to comply with study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: refined indigo naturalis ointment
Refined indigo naturalis ointment was applied topically to one of 2 bilaterally symmetrical psoriatic plaque lesions of the same patient for 8 weeks, starting on the date of enrollment in the study
The patients applied either refined oil extract or crude indigo naturalis ointmnet topically to each of two bilaterally symmetrical psoriatic plaque lesions for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • refined ointment
Active Comparator: crude indigo naturalis ointment
Crude indigo naturalis ointment was applied topically to one of 2 bilaterally symmetrical psoriatic plaque lesions of the same patient for 8 weeks, starting on the date of enrollment in the study
The patients applied either refined oil extract or crude indigo naturalis ointmnet topically to each of two bilaterally symmetrical psoriatic plaque lesions for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Crude ointment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Severity Idex(PSI) at Week 8.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The PSI score is comprised of the grading for scaling, erythema, and induration on a 5-point scale (where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe and 4=very severe) and the sum of these three items with a minimal score of 0 and a maximum of score of 12. Higher values represent a worse outcome. For expample, a highter PSI score at baseline and lower PSI score after treatment represent an improvement.
Baseline and Week 8
Clearing Percentage of Target Plaque Area
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The target plaque area was rated from 0% to 100% (0%=clearance after treatment and 100%=baseline before treatment). Higher values represent a worse outcome. For expample, a lower percentage after treatment represent an improvement.
Baseline and Week 8
Percentage Improvement Compared to Baseline in the Target Plaque.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The improvement percentage of the target plaque at the follow-up visit was calculated as: [(Area of baseline plaque*PSI of baseline plaque - Area of plaque week 8*PSI of plaque week 8)/(Area of baseline plaque*PSI of baseline plaque)]*100%. Higher values represent a better outcome. For expample, a higher percent represents an improvement.
Baseline and Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' Rating of the Overall Improvement at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
At week 8, patients rated an overall response to treatment (separately for each side of the body), taking into account both the extent and the degree of the disease, compared with the pretreatment condition, on a 6-point scale (0=worse,1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent, 5=cleared). A score of 4 or higher represents a better outcome.
Baseline and Week 8
Patients Preferred Ointment Type.
Time Frame: Week 8
At the end of the trial, the patients were asked which ointment they preferred.
Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yin-Ku Lin, MD. PhD., Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 1, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMRPG280391

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis Vulgaris

Clinical Trials on refined indigo naturalis ointment

Subscribe