Health SMART (Stress Management and Relaxation Training)

March 26, 2012 updated by: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Phase II Study of Stress Management and Vaccine Response Among Women at Risk for Breast Cancer

The study will examine the effects of a cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) group intervention on antibody and cellular immune function among women who are at elevated risk for breast cancer because of family history.

Hypothesis 1: Women who participate in the CBSM intervention will have a larger primary and secondary antibody response to HA vaccine compared to women in the comparison group.

Hypothesis 2: In response to stimulation with HA antigen, lymphocytes from women who participate in the CBSM intervention will have larger primary and secondary in-vitro proliferative response to HA antigen, and increased primary and secondary in-vitro TH1 cytokine response to HA antigen compared to lymphocytes from women in the comparison group.

Hypothesis 3: Women who participate in the 10-week CBSM group intervention will report lower levels of distress immediately after the intervention compared to women in the comparison group. Changes in distress as a result of the intervention will be associated with any significant changes in immune function discovered in Aims 1 and 2.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cancer vaccines are emerging as important tools for cancer treatment and prevention. Unfortunately, the cohorts that ultimately will benefit most from the vaccines, those at elevated risk for cancer, are likely to be stressed. Chronic stress can impair immune function, including immune response to vaccines. An inadequate response to vaccines can weaken their protective effect. Women at elevated risk for breast cancer can experience significant levels of distress and have associated immune function decrements. Interventions to treat distress-related immune decrements among these women are needed because these women will be among the first candidates for breast cancer vaccines. In theory, stress-management interventions should improve immune function and response to vaccines; however, the findings to date are mixed. The proposed investigation will conduct an exploratory randomized clinical trial to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) group intervention among women who are at elevated risk for breast cancer because of family history and who are reporting elevated levels of distress. Study outcomes will include antibody and cellular immune response to hepatitis A vaccine and self-reported distress.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Family history of breast cancer
  • Fluent in English
  • Working phone and address
  • Plan to live in the area for one year
  • Reporting elevated levels of distress at screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior cancer diagnosis (except non-melanoma skin cancer)
  • Current major depressive episode
  • History of Bipolar Disorder or Schizophrenia
  • History of autoimmune disease
  • History of Hepatitis A or HA vaccination
  • Use of immune modulating drugs (e.g. corticosteroids, antihistamines), nicotine, or > 3 drinks/ day alcohol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stress Management
Stress Management and Relaxation Training workshops
The intervention employs CBSM techniques interwoven with information in a supportive group format. The information portion of the intervention focuses on learning to cope with daily stressors, and learning about optimal use of social support. Avoidance coping is discouraged, and acceptance and reframing are instead encouraged as coping responses. Health behavior change, framed as a coping technique, will also be discussed using motivational interviewing techniques. Relaxation techniques include progressive muscle relaxation, guided imagery, autogenics, meditation, and deep breathing. The goal of the CBSM intervention is thus to reduce distress through a variety of techniques.
Other Names:
  • Stress Management and Relaxation Training (SMART)
No Intervention: Wait-list
Wait-list comparison group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Linear mixed models regression with an exchangeable covariance structure will be used to determine the average change in IgM, IgG and proliferative response to HA vaccine antibody response to HA vaccine following the intervention, as a function of time.
Time Frame: From post-intervention to 1-month post-intervention (primary antibody response) and from 6-months post-intervention to 7-months post-intervention (secondary antibody response)
From post-intervention to 1-month post-intervention (primary antibody response) and from 6-months post-intervention to 7-months post-intervention (secondary antibody response)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Linear mixed model regression with an exchangeable covariance structure will be used to investigate the effects of change in distress on immune response as a function of time. We will include time as a random effect.
Time Frame: Length of the protocol (Basline to 7 months post-intervention)
Length of the protocol (Basline to 7 months post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bonnie A. McGregor, PhD, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 27, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-6940
  • 1R21CA134813 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)

Subscribe