CO2 Inhalation as a New Treatment Modality for Apnea of Prematurity

March 1, 2010 updated by: University of Manitoba
The objective of the present proposed study is to discover whether, in the nursery setting, administration of low concentration inhaled CO2 (0.8%) for a prolonged period (3 days) can make breathing more regular with less apneic time than that observed with administration of theophylline. The hypothesis to be tested is that inhalation of low concentration CO2 (0.8%) will reduce apnea more effectively and will have fewer adverse side effects than theophylline.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

  1. To discover whether, in the nursery setting, continuous administration of a low concentration of inhaled CO2 (0.8%) for a prolonged period (3 days) can make breathing in preterm infants more regular with less apneic time than that observed with theophylline.
  2. To discover whether inhalation of low CO2 decreases apneas, particularly prolonged apneas (>20 seconds), more effectively than theophylline.
  3. To discover whether short term (during hospitalization) and long term (2 years) adverse side effects are less pronounced with CO2 than with theophylline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

87

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R2H 2A6
        • St Boniface General Hospital
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 0L8
        • Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 7 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants between 27 and 32 weeks gestational age hospitalized in the neonatal intensive or intermediate care units
  • Significant apnea, defined as 5 or more self-resolved apneas, or 2 or more apneas requiring intervention over a 12 hr period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already on methylxanthine treatment
  • On supplemental oxygen, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
  • Had major congenital anomalies, sepsis, or other known causes of apnea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Theophylline
Oral loading dose of 6 mg per kilogram of body weight of theophylline followed by a maintenance dose of 2 mg per kilogram every 8 hours plus room air by nasal prongs at 0.5 l/min for 3 days.
Experimental: CO2 inhalation
Equivalent loading and maintenance volume of oral normal saline plus CO2 (3% at the source, approximately 1% inhaled) with room air by nasal prongs at 0.5 l/min for 3 days
Inhalation of CO2 (3% at the source, approximately 1% inhaled) with room air by nasal prongs at 0.5 l/min for 3 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The decrease in total apnea time (duration of all apneic pauses ≥ 5 seconds) during administration of theophylline and carbon dioxide.
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease in the rate of long apneas (≥ 20 seconds) and the incidence of short term side effects
Time Frame: 3 days
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ruben E Alvaro, MD, University of Manitoba

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2010

Last Verified

January 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Apnea of Prematurity

Clinical Trials on Theophylline

Subscribe