Clinical Research of Retrograde Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade (RIBPA)

February 24, 2010 updated by: Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

New Approach for Brachial Plexus Block: Clinical Research of Retrograde Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade

Brachial plexus block is a frequently used technique for upper extremity surgery. All present approaches and techniques have certain advantages and disadvantages. It's necessary to develop a new approach to brachial plexus block which 1) provides reliable anesthesia, 2) is easy to perform, 3) isn't restricted by posture, 4) provides extensive sensory distribution, 5) causes as few complications as possible, 6) easily place a secured catheter for post-operative analgesia. The investigators established the retrograde infraclavicular brachial plexus block approach. The investigators compared and verified the feasibility, efficacy and safety of this new approach with other classic approaches to brachial plexus block.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Traditional brachial plexus block approaches have certain limitations. This study evaluated the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of a new retrograde infraclavicular brachial plexus block as compared with interscalene and supraclavicular approaches. 90 patients scheduled for elective upper limb surgery were recruited and randomized into three groups, 30 for each group. Patients of Group A received retrograde infraclavicular block, interscalene (by Winnie) approach for Group B and supraclavicular (by Kulenkampff) approach for Group C. The retrograde infraclavicular block was performed with the insertion point medial to the coracoid process and the needle advanced to ipsilateral interscalene groove. Neurostimulation was used and 40ml of 0.5% ropivacaine were injected. Sensory block, adverse effects and complications were evaluated and recorded every 5 minutes until 30min after local anesthetic injection. The needle insertion depth, angles in coronary and sagittal planes of Group A were also recorded. Success rate of each nerve sensory block, sensory block result, complications, rate of satisfaction, rate of failure and incidence rate of adverse effects are all compared among groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100035
        • Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status Ⅰ~Ⅱ
  • Scheduled for elective upper extremity surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 yr or >60 yr
  • Body weight <50kg or >100kg
  • Serious brain, heart, lung, liver, kidney diseases or diabetes mellitus
  • Incapability or refusing to be enrolled
  • Infection at the site of puncture, skin ulcer
  • Coagulopathy
  • Contralateral phrenic nerve paralysis, contralateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis or pneumothorax

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: retrograde infraclavicular
Patients were received retrograde infraclavicular brachial plexus block.
0.5% Ropivacaine 40ml
Other Names:
  • NAROPIN® 1.0%
Active Comparator: interscalene
Patients were received interscalene brachial plexus block.
0.5% Ropivacaine 40ml
Other Names:
  • NAROPIN® 1.0%
Active Comparator: supraclavicular
Patients were received supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
0.5% Ropivacaine 40ml
Other Names:
  • NAROPIN® 1.0%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Success rate of nerve sensory block
Time Frame: 30 minutes
30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Success rate of motor block
Time Frame: 30 minutes
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaoguang Zhang, MB, Department of anesthesiology, Beijing jishuitan hospital, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2010

Last Verified

February 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Extremity

Clinical Trials on brachial plexus block

Subscribe