Local Anesthesia Versus Saline Serum in Surgical Incision of Colorectal or Hepatic Surgery (CATROP-2007)

February 23, 2017 updated by: antonia dalmau llitjos, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Randomised and Double-blind Clinical Trial on Post-operative Analgesic Efficacy in Colorectal Surgery and Hepatic Surgery With Continuous Infusion of Local Anesthesia vs Saline Serum in the Surgical Incision.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a continuous infusion of local anesthesia with a catheter in the surgical wound reduces patient consumption of opiates by 30% in the 48-hour postoperative period following surgery for colorectal neoplasm and hepatic surgery versus the continuous infusion of physiological serum.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative analgesia in major abdominal surgery is managed with intravenous PCA (patient controlled analgesia) with morphine associated to non-steroidal anti-inflammatories drugs (NSAD) and paracetamol in the first 48 hours of the postoperative phase. With this multimodal approach patients undergoing colorectal surgery have a median pain score on the verbal scale (0-10) of 3 (range 0-8) with a mean of morphine consumption of 54 mg (SD 24 mg) and patients undergoing hepatic surgery have a median pain score of 2(range 0-7) with a mean of morphine consumption of 28 mg (SD 17 mg).

Although opiates are very potent analgesics they also produce side effects and numerous studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in morbidity when patients received lower dose of opiates during anesthesia and in postoperative period. Continuous infusion of local anesthetics in the surgical wound has been used for pain control in different types of surgeries. However, controversial reports has been reported in abdominal surgery.

We are conducting prospective, randomised and double-blind placebo control trials in two surgical models (colo-rectal oncologic surgery and hepatic resection) using continuous perfusion of ropivacaine 0.38% in the surgical wound versus saline.

Anesthetic protocol is the same for all patients.

Patients undergoing colo-rectal surgery can be operated either in laparotomy or laparoscopic technique therefore patients are stratified into four groups once surgical closure has begun:

  • Group A1 ropivacaine and laparotomy
  • Group A2 ropivacaine and laparoscopy
  • Group B1 saline and laparotomy
  • Group B2 saline and laparoscopy

In the preanesthesia visit patients who match inclusion criteria are invited to participate in the study and they signed the informed consent. When the patient is in the theatre a nurse not involved in the management of patients opens a closed envelope which indicates the solution to be prepared according to the assigned group.

The surgeon inserts a multiperforated catheter at the subfascial level of surgical wound , just below the suture of the muscular fascia (between the peritoneum and the muscular fascia) and after that surgeons finish the subcutaneous plane and the skin. After the closure a bolus of 5 ml (laparoscopy colon surgery)or 10 ml (laparotomy colon and hepatic surgery) of the solution is given through the catheter and subsequently an elastomer filled with ropivacaine or saline is connected. The catheter is fixed to the skin with steri-strip and sterile dressing.

During the procedure we administer in a protocol basis the NSAD and thirty minutes before the end of the surgery we administer morphine. In the postoperative period the patient receives a NSAD regime and a PCA morphine treatment.

The catheter is withdrawn after 48 hours and also the PCA and the analgesic treatment is with NSAD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

225

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Hospitalet . Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Anesthesiology Service of Univeritary Hospital of Bellvitge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-III
  • Undergoing scheduled colorectal cancer and hepatic surgery
  • Patients must be able to understand the PCA (the self administration system)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Background of allergic reaction or contraindication for local anesthesia or non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • Patient with epidural catheter or receiving combined analgesia during surgery (age above 80, moderate-severe respiratory dysfunction, patients who prior presented complex postoperative pain management.
  • Emergency surgery
  • Patients with risk of hepatic insufficiency (Klatskin's tumor, extended right hepatectomy, right hepatectomy in patients with steatosis, hepatic resection in patients over 70 years of age who have been given chemotherapy).
  • Inflammatory bowel disease: ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease.
  • Major psychiatric condition.
  • Patients with active drug addiction or on chronic treatment with opiates.
  • Morbid obesity (BMI > 35 kg/m2)
  • Patients with heart disease (myocardiopathy, conduction alterations, antiarrhythmic treatment) and severe liver disease (alteration synthesis, histolysis and or cholestasis).
  • Patients with kidney failure.
  • Patients treated with fluvoxamine (antidepressant) and enoxacin (antibiotic) both are potent inhibitors of CYPIA2.
  • Septic patients
  • Patients that do not wish to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ropivacaine
After a bolus administration of Ropivacaine a perfusion ot the same anesthetic is initiated through an elastomeric wound during 48 hours

Laparotomy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus ropivacaine 0,75% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,38% at a 5ml/h.

Laparoscopy of colorectal surgery: 5 ml bolus ropivacaine 0,75% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,38% at a 2 ml/h.

Hepatic surgery: 10 ml de ropivacaine 0,45% + infusion with elastomeric pump with ropivacaine 0,23 at a 5ml/h.

Other Names:
  • (wound infusion ropivacaine)
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: saline solution
After a bolus administration of saline solution a perfusion ot saline solution is initiated through an elastomeric wound during 48 hours

Laparotomy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 5ml/h.

Laparoscopy of colorectal surgery: 10 ml bolus saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 2 ml/h.

Hepatic surgery: 10 ml de saline solution 0.9% + infusion with elastomeric pump with saline solution 0.9% at a 5ml/h

Other Names:
  • wound infusion saline solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mg of Morphine Consumption During 48 Hours Administered by Patient Controlled Analgesia System
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity of Pain Measured by Verbal Pain Scale.
Time Frame: At interval periods during 48 hours
Verbal pain scale is a numeric measure of intensity pain, values range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain), Each patient rate the paín that feel with a number from 0 to 10.
At interval periods during 48 hours
Time Spent Sitting in a Chair, Deambulation, Solid Ingestion.
Time Frame: 7 Days (from Day 8-15)
7 Days (from Day 8-15)
Secondary Effects Due to Morphine: Nausea and Vomiting
Time Frame: during 48 hours
during 48 hours
Local Reaction in the Wound and Insertion Point of the Catheter (Inflammation Signs and Infection)
Time Frame: During 8-15 days
During 8-15 days
Contamination of the Catheter (Microbiologist Analysis)
Time Frame: at 48 hours
at 48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Antònia Dalmau Llitjós, Physical D, Univeritary Hospital of Bellvitge. IDIBELL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on ropivacaine

3
Subscribe