Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Axial Spondyloarthritis

July 4, 2018 updated by: UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH

Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Axial Spondyloarthritis

The study is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) in subjects with active axial Spondyloarthritis (axial SpA).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

325

Phase

  • Phase 3

Expanded Access

Available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • 700
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • 704
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • 701
      • Cordoba, Argentina
        • 705
      • La Plata, Argentina
        • 709
      • Rosario, Argentina
        • 706
      • San Juan, Argentina
        • 710
      • San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
        • 708
      • San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina
        • 702
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • 153
      • Gent, Belgium
        • 152
      • Liege, Belgium
        • 151
      • Campinas, Brazil
        • 760
      • Curitiba, Brazil
        • 750
      • Goiânia, Brazil
        • 761
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil
        • 756
    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
        • 907
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
        • 903
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
        • 900
    • Ontario
      • Windsor, Ontario, Canada
        • 910
    • Quebec
      • Sainte Foy, Quebec, Canada
        • 902
      • Brno, Czechia
        • 504
      • Hlucin, Czechia
        • 501
      • Pardubice, Czechia
        • 500
      • Praha 2, Czechia
        • 502
      • Terezin, Czechia
        • 505
      • Zlin, Czechia
        • 503
      • Boulogne-Billan Court, France
        • 200
      • Lille, France
        • 201
      • Limoges, France
        • 205
      • Montpellier, France
        • 206
      • Paris, France
        • 204
      • Tours, France
        • 202
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 257
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 258
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • 255
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 254
      • Herne, Germany
        • 250
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • 253
      • München, Germany
        • 263
      • München, Germany
        • 260
      • Ratingen, Germany
        • 256
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 303
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 305
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • 302
      • Miskolc, Hungary
        • 306
      • Veszprém, Hungary
        • 300
      • Ancona, Italy
        • 352
      • Firenze, Italy
        • 351
      • Pisa, Italy
        • 350
      • Cuernavaca, Mexico
        • 802
      • Monterrey, Mexico
        • 801
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • 401
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • 400
      • Bialystok, Poland
        • 458
      • Dabrowka, Poland
        • 452
      • Elblag, Poland
        • 455
      • Gdanks, Poland
        • 459
      • Krakow, Poland
        • 457
      • Lublin, Poland
        • 450
      • Poznan, Poland
        • 454
      • Torun, Poland
        • 453
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • 456
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • 462
      • Mérida, Spain
        • 550
      • Santander, Spain
        • 554
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
        • 552
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • 553
      • Barnsley, United Kingdom
        • 605
      • Leeds, United Kingdom
        • 600
      • London, United Kingdom
        • 602
      • Salford, United Kingdom
        • 601
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
        • 961
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
        • 953
    • Arizona
      • Peoria, Arizona, United States
        • 954
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
        • 971
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States
        • 987
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States
        • 974
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
        • 973
      • Palm Desert, California, United States
        • 966
      • San Diego, California, United States
        • 952
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States
        • 957
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
        • 962
      • Orange Park, Florida, United States
        • 959
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
        • 990
      • Vero Beach, Florida, United States
        • 958
    • Maryland
      • Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
        • 964
    • Minnesota
      • Eagan, Minnesota, United States
        • 969
    • Mississippi
      • Flowood, Mississippi, United States
        • 984
    • Missouri
      • Florissant, Missouri, United States
        • 965
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
        • 950
    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States
        • 985
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States
        • 963
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
        • 977
      • Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
        • 951
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
        • 970
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
        • 982
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
        • 972
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
        • 975
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • 978
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • 983
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • 967
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
        • 981
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
        • 968

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented diagnosis of adult-onset axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA) of at least 3 months' duration as defined by the specified Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria
  • Active disease as defined by:

    • Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4
    • Back pain ≥ 4 on a 0 to 10 Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NRS) (from BASDAI item 2)
    • C-Reactive Protein (CRP) > ULN (Upper Limit of Normal) and/or current evidence (ie, within the last 3 months from Screening) for Sacroiliitis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as defined by Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria
  • Intolerance to or inadequate response to at least 1 Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of total Spinal Ankylosis ("bamboo spine")
  • Diagnosis of any other Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Prior treatment with any experimental biological agents for treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA)
  • Exposure to more than 1 TNF-antagonist or to more than 2 previous biological agents for Axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA)
  • History of or current chronic or recurrent infections
  • High risk of infection
  • Recent live vaccination
  • Concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy
  • Class III or IV congestive heart failure - New York Heart Association (NYHA)
  • Demyelinating disease of the central nervous system
  • Female subjects who are breastfeeding, pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study or within 3 months following the last dose of the investigational product
  • Subjects with any other condition which, in the investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CZP 200 mg Q2W

Subjects received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneous (sc) on Weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by 200 mg CZP sc every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 6 onwards.

At every visit, subjects received one injection of 200 mg CZP and one injection of Placebo to maintain the study blind.

200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CZP
  • Certolizumab Pegol
Matching Placebo to CZP injection.
Experimental: CZP 400 mg Q4W

Subjects received Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg subcutaneous (sc) on Weeks 0, 2 and 4, followed by 400 mg CZP sc every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 8 onwards.

Subjects received 2 injections of Placebo every 4 weeks in between the 2 injections of 200 mg CZP to maintain the study blind.

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.
400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CZP
  • Certolizumab Pegol
Other: Placebo to CZP 200 mg escape on Week 16
Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 16. Subjects who did not achieve certain predefined response criteria at both Weeks 14 and 16 left the Placebo group on Week 16 and were treated with three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc on Weeks 16, 18 and 20, followed by 200 mg CZP sc every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 22 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.
200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CZP
  • Certolizumab Pegol
Matching Placebo to CZP injection.
Other: Placebo to CZP 400 mg escape on Week 16
Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 16. Subjects who did not achieve certain predefined response criteria at both Weeks 14 and 16 left the Placebo group on Week 16 and were treated with three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc on Weeks 16, 18 and 20, followed by 400 mg CZP sc every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 24 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.
Matching Placebo to CZP injection.
400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CZP
  • Certolizumab Pegol
Other: Placebo to CZP 200 mg on Week 24
Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 24. Three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc were given on Weeks 24, 26 and 28, followed by 200 mg CZP sc every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 30 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.
200 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CZP
  • Certolizumab Pegol
Matching Placebo to CZP injection.
Other: Placebo to CZP 400 mg on Week 24
Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 24. Three loading doses of CZP 400 mg sc were given on Weeks 24, 26 and 28, followed by 400 mg CZP sc every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 32 onwards. Additionally, Placebo injections were administered as appropriate in order to maintain the study blind.
Matching Placebo to CZP injection.
400 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) every 4 weeks (Q4W).
Other Names:
  • Cimzia
  • CZP
  • Certolizumab Pegol
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Matching Placebo to CZP injections from Week 0 to Week 24. Placebo subjects who did not achieve certain predefined response criteria at both Weeks 14 and 16 left the Placebo group on Week 16.

After 24 weeks, all subjects were randomized to active treatment with CZP 200 mg Q2W or CZP 400 mg Q4W.

Matching Placebo to CZP injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment in Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20 % (ASAS20) Response Criteria at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12

The ASAS20 is defined as an improvement of at least 20 % and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in at least 3 of the 4 following domains:

  • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
  • Pain assessment (total spinal pain)
  • Function (represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI))
  • Inflammation (the mean of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration)

and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain (deterioration is defined as a relative worsening of at least 20 % and an absolute worsening of at least 1 unit).

Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment in Axial Spondyloarthritis International Society 20 % (ASAS20) Response Criteria at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24

The ASAS20 is defined as an improvement of at least 20 % and absolute improvement of at least 1 unit on a 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in at least 3 of the 4 following domains:

  • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
  • Pain assessment (total spinal pain)
  • Function (represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI))
  • Inflammation (the mean of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration)

and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain (deterioration is defined as a relative worsening of at least 20 % and an absolute worsening of at least 1 unit).

Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 12
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
The BASFI assesses physical function in comprising 10 items relating to activities during the past week. Each item ranges from 0 ("Easy") to 10 ("Impossible"). The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better physical function. A negative value in BASFI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
From Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at Week 24
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
The BASFI assesses physical function in comprising 10 items relating to activities during the past week. Each item ranges from 0 ("Easy") to 10 ("Impossible"). The BASFI is the mean of the 10 scores such that the total score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better physical function. A negative value in BASFI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
From Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 12
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
The BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument which consists of six 10 unit horizontal Numerical Rating Scales (NRSs) to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration, respectively) over the last week. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower disease activity. A negative value in BASDAI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
From Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 24
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
The BASDAI is a validated self-reported instrument which consists of six 10 unit horizontal Numerical Rating Scales (NRSs) to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain and swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (both severity and duration, respectively) over the last week. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating lower disease activity. A negative value in BASDAI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
From Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 12
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
The BASMI characterizes the spinal mobility of subjects with axial Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). It is a disease-specific measure consisting of 5 clinical measures to reflect subject axial status: cervical rotation; tragus to wall distance; lateral lumbar flexion; lumbar flexion (modified Schober test); intermalleolar distance. According to the linear definition of the BASMI a score of 0 to 10 is calculated for each item based on the measurement. The mean of the sum of the 5 scores provides the BASMI score. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their axial SpA. A negative value in BASMI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
From Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 24
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
The BASMI characterizes the spinal mobility of subjects with axial SpA and AS. It is a disease-specific measure consisting of 5 clinical measures to reflect subject axial status: cervical rotation; tragus to wall distance; lateral lumbar flexion; lumbar flexion (modified Schober test); intermalleolar distance. According to the linear definition of the BASMI a score of 0 to 10 is calculated for each item based on the measurement. The mean of the sum of the 5 scores provides the BASMI score. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their axial SpA. A negative value in BASMI change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the better the improvement.
From Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Spine Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scoring System for Disease Activity (ASspiMRI-a) in the Berlin Modification at Week 12
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
The Berlin modification of the ASspiMRI-a is a scoring system with a concentration on Short-Tau-Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequences without other fat saturation techniques. It quantifies changes in 23 Vertebral Units (VU) of the spine. A VU is defined as the region between 2 virtual lines through the middle of each vertebra. Active inflammation is scored by grading the degree of bone marrow edema from 0 to 3 in 1 dimension on 1 or more consecutive slices that represent the highest level of inflammation in a particular VU. Total spine ASspiMRI-a score in the Berlin modification can range from 0 to 69 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. A negative value in total spine ASspiMRI-a score change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the higher the reduction of inflammation.
From Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Sacroiliac Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Score at Week 12
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
The SPARCC scoring method for lesions found on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is based on an abnormal increased signal on the Short-Tau-Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequence, representing bone marrow edema. Total Sacroiliac (SI) joint SPARCC score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores indicating higher joint inflammation. A negative value in SPARCC change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline. The higher the negative value the higher the reduction of inflammation.
From Baseline to Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, +1 877 822 9493 UCB

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 16, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondyloarthropathies

Clinical Trials on CZP 200 mg Q2W

3
Subscribe