Combination Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Versus Sulfasalazine in Inflammatory Back Pain

March 21, 2013 updated by: Vikas Agarwal, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences

A Prospective Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Combination Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) vs Monotherapy (Sulfasalazine) in Patients With Inflammatory Low Backache in Early Seronegative Spondylarthropathy

Till now no drug has been conclusively shown to affect the natural course of the inflammatory back ache in seronegative spondylarthropathies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) have been the main stay of treatment for these diseases for long. Despite providing good pain relief, they are largely ineffective in altering the natural course of these diseases. However, very often, in spite of therapy, pain and discomfort continues in these patients with recurrent exacerbations. Other drugs have been tried in these patients.

The DMARDS (Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs) are a group of drugs which have come into prominence following their remarkable efficacy in the management of Rheumatoid Arthritis, another chronic inflammatory autoimmune arthritis. The major drugs which come in this group are Methotrexate, Sulfasalazine, Hydroxychloroquine and Leflunomide. Of these drugs, the most well studied drug in Spondylarthropathy is Sulfasalazine. Trials have shown variable results of response of spondyloarthropathy to sulfasalazine. The other major DMARD tried is methotrexate. Though large well controlled trials are lacking, the available data on its efficacy in spondyloarthropathy has not been favorable. Leflunomide, the other major DMARD has also fared poorly in a controlled trial in ankylosing spondylitis. There is at present inadequate data regarding the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine.

The discovery of anti TNF-α have been the major breakthrough in the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and Spondyloarthropathies (SpA). These drugs, besides providing symptomatic improvement, also produce improvement in the indices of disease activity as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and the Assessment of Spondylo-Arthritis International Society (ASAS). Besides, the enormous cost, incurred at a rate of about Rs 700,000/- per annum, put it out of reach of the majority of affected population. Add to these is the increased risk of tuberculosis and fungal infections, a major problem in India.

In this background there is severe and pressing need for alternate safe and effective drugs in the management of these diseases. It is here that the combination DMARD therapy assumes importance as a potential safe and cheaper alternative.

We aim to assess the efficacy of combination DMARD therapy in patients with early inflammatory chronic backache in patients with sero negative spondyloarthropathies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Spondyloarthropathies SpA

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • UP
      • Lucknow, UP, India, 226014
        • Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who fulfilled criteria for the diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis (Modified New York Criteria) or undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy (UspA) (Amor criteria) and are within 8 years of disease onset with:
  • Inflammatory back Pain of more than 6 months
  • BASDAI ≥4 or EMS ≥45 minutes
  • Have failed maximum dose of at least one NSAID for 6 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with renal diseases
  • patients with hepatic diseases
  • Patients with severe uncorrected anemia (Hb<7gm)
  • Patients previously received full dose of sulfasalazine and/or methotrexate with inadequate relief
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Malignancy or active infection
  • Patient requiring and affording biologicals
  • Patients who have received steroids in the past 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Combination DMARD
All patients included in the study, will be started on Sulfasalazine 1 gm once daily and in the absence of side effects increased to 2gm daily. All patients will also receive folic acid 5 mg thrice weekly. At the end of four weeks the patients will be reassessed with baseline hemogram, SGPT, SGOT and serum Creatinine. In the absence of any contraindication, patients will be randomized into two groups Group 1 to receive Combination Disease Modifying therapy with Sulfasalazine, Methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Patient will be started on Methotrexate/placebo at 10 mg once weekly and increased every week by 2.5 mg to maximum dose of 20 mg per week in the absence of side effects. These patients will also be started on Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg per day.
Methotrexate will be prepared as unmarked tablets of 2.5 mg strength each and Hydroxychloroquine as unmarked tablet of 200 mg strength. Patients will be started on Methotrexate/placebo at 10 mg once weekly and increased every week by 2.5 mg to maximum dose of 20 mg per week in the absence of side effects. These patients will also be started on Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg per day or placebo.
Other Names:
  • Folitrax
  • HCQS
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
All patients included in the study, will be started on Sulfasalazine 1 gm once daily and in the absence of side effects increased to 2gm daily All patients will also receive folic acid 5 mg twice weekly. At the end of four weeks the patients will be reassessed with baseline hemogram, SGPT, SGOT and serum Creatinine. Group 2 patients will receive Sulfasalazine and placebo for methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine.
Identical placebos (for methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine)will be prepared and prescribed in identical fashion as the methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine in the combination DMARD arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Primary end point will be number of patients attaining Assessment of spondyloarthropathy international society 20 (ASAS20) response.
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement in Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI)
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Improvement in Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI)
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Improvement in Bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index (BASMI)
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Improvement in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Index
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Patient pain and global assessment of disease
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Physician assessment of pain and global disease
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
change in Short form 36 (SF-36) and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) parameters
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Reduction in non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) dose
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vikas Agarwal, MD, DM, SGPGIMS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 25, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 22, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2013

Last Verified

March 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seronegative Spondyloarthropathies

Clinical Trials on Methotrexate, Hydroxychloroquine

3
Subscribe