OSCAR - An Internet-based Supportive Coaching for Informal Caregivers of Adult Individuals With an Acquired Brain Injury

July 22, 2015 updated by: University of Bern

OSCAR - An Internet-based Supportive Coaching for Informal Caregivers of Adult Individuals With an Acquired Brain Injury.

This is an intervention study for informal caregivers of adult patients with an acquired brain injury (stroke, traumatic brain injury or cerebral haemorrhage). It will determine whether an internet-based supportive coaching offers benefits to the caregivers in their own process of coping in the aftermath of a brain injury of a close relative. We expect the internet-based supportive coaching to be more effective in the treatment of emotional distress reactions and caregiver burden than the treatment as usual.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background

A brain injury (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury) occurs all of a sudden and is often followed by complex neurological and psychological consequences. These consequences do not only affect the patients with the brain injury as Muriel Lezak already stated in 1988: "Brain damage is a family affair". Symptoms of depression and anxiety as well as an increased caregiver burden are common, but there is still a lack in randomized controlled trials that investigate the efficacy of multicomponent interventions for informal caregivers. The main aim of the current study is to close this scientific gap with an innovative method for this special population. OSCAR (the Internet-based supportive coaching) uses the Internet as a communication- and information brokering medium and is designed as a "guided-self-help tool" where a qualified therapist individually supports every participant. The key objective is to investigate the feasibility, acceptance and efficacy of an Internet-based supportive coaching (OSCAR) for informal caregivers of adult individuals with an acquired brain injury. It is expected that the Internet-based supportive coaching (OSCAR) leads to a better coping of emotional distress reactions and caregiver burden.

Objective

A key objective is to investigate the feasibility, acceptance and efficacy of an Internet-based supportive coaching (OSCAR) for informal caregivers of adult individuals with an acquired brain injury.

Methods

To one part, OSCAR is part of a randomized controlled intervention study where a standard neuropsychological therapy is compared with an integrative neuro-psychotherapy. The Internet-based supportive coaching (OSCAR) for the caregivers is part of the integrative neuro-psychotherapy arm.

Additionally a randomized controlled intervention study with a waiting list-control-group design is realised.

Assessments will be made at baseline, after 4 months (progress), after ending with the training (termination) and at 6 months post treatment (follow-up).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3012
        • Dep. of clinical psychology and psychotherapy, University of Berne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Family caregiver of an adult with a stroke, cerebral haemorrhage or traumatic brain injury
  • sufficient German language skills
  • at least 3 months after the brain injury
  • access to a computer with internet access
  • minimum age of 18 years
  • informed consent to participate voluntarily in the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • acute suicidal tendency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Internet-based supportive coaching OSCAR
Arm 1: Internet-based supportive coaching OSCAR
The Internet-based supportive coaching (OSCAR) is an scientifically based multicomponent intervention
OTHER: Waiting list control group (treatment as usual, TAU)
Waiting-list control group (treatment as usual, TAU, no specific intervention)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI)
Time Frame: Baseline
The German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI) is based on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), the most widely used measure to assess caregiver burden. The 22 Items ask for the strain caregivers perceive (e.g., "Do you feel that your social life has suffered because you are caring for your relative?"). Responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always), the maximum score being 88. The higher the total score, the heavier the perceived burden.
Baseline
German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI)
Time Frame: 4 months after baseline
The German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI) is based on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), the most widely used measure to assess caregiver burden. The 22 Items ask for the strain caregivers perceive (e.g., "Do you feel that your social life has suffered because you are caring for your relative?"). Responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always), the maximum score being 88. The higher the total score, the heavier the perceived burden.
4 months after baseline
German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI)
Time Frame: 8 months after baseline
The German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI) is based on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), the most widely used measure to assess caregiver burden. The 22 Items ask for the strain caregivers perceive (e.g., "Do you feel that your social life has suffered because you are caring for your relative?"). Responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always), the maximum score being 88. The higher the total score, the heavier the perceived burden.
8 months after baseline
German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI)
Time Frame: 14 months after baseline (follow-up)
The German Zarit Burden Interview (G-ZBI) is based on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), the most widely used measure to assess caregiver burden. The 22 Items ask for the strain caregivers perceive (e.g., "Do you feel that your social life has suffered because you are caring for your relative?"). Responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always), the maximum score being 88. The higher the total score, the heavier the perceived burden.
14 months after baseline (follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Baseline
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is the 1996 revision of the BDI created by Dr. Aaron T. Beck, which is one of the most widely used self-report questionnaires measuring the severity of depression. The 21 multiple-choice items address the severity of 21 typical symptoms of depression over the past two weeks. The higher the total score, the more severe the depression.
Baseline
Quality of life measured by the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Baseline
The WHOQOL-BREF self-report questionnaire is the abbreviated 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100. It assesses the perceived quality of life (e.g. "To what extent do you feel your life to be meaningful?"). Quality of life is defined by the WHO as "…individuals' perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns."
Baseline
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20)
Time Frame: Baseline
The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20) is the abbreviated 20-item version of the PSQ (Levenstein et al., 1993) and assesses self-reported experienced stress.
Baseline
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Time Frame: 4 months after baseline
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is the 1996 revision of the BDI created by Dr. Aaron T. Beck, which is one of the most widely used self-report questionnaires measuring the severity of depression. The 21 multiple-choice items address the severity of 21 typical symptoms of depression over the past two weeks. The higher the total score, the more severe the depression.
4 months after baseline
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Time Frame: 8 months after baseline
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is the 1996 revision of the BDI created by Dr. Aaron T. Beck, which is one of the most widely used self-report questionnaires measuring the severity of depression. The 21 multiple-choice items address the severity of 21 typical symptoms of depression over the past two weeks. The higher the total score, the more severe the depression.
8 months after baseline
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Time Frame: 14 months after baseline (follow-up)
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is the 1996 revision of the BDI created by Dr. Aaron T. Beck, which is one of the most widely used self-report questionnaires measuring the severity of depression. The 21 multiple-choice items address the severity of 21 typical symptoms of depression over the past two weeks. The higher the total score, the more severe the depression.
14 months after baseline (follow-up)
Quality of life measured by the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 4 months after baseline
The WHOQOL-BREF self-report questionnaire is the abbreviated 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100. It assesses the perceived quality of life (e.g. "To what extent do you feel your life to be meaningful?"). Quality of life is defined by the WHO as "…individuals' perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns."
4 months after baseline
Quality of life measured by the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 8 months after baseline
The WHOQOL-BREF self-report questionnaire is the abbreviated 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100. It assesses the perceived quality of life (e.g. "To what extent do you feel your life to be meaningful?"). Quality of life is defined by the WHO as "…individuals' perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns."
8 months after baseline
Quality of life measured by the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 14 months after baseline (follow-up)
The WHOQOL-BREF self-report questionnaire is the abbreviated 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100. It assesses the perceived quality of life (e.g. "To what extent do you feel your life to be meaningful?"). Quality of life is defined by the WHO as "…individuals' perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns."
14 months after baseline (follow-up)
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20)
Time Frame: 4 months after baseline
The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20) is the abbreviated 20-item version of the PSQ (Levenstein et al., 1993) and assesses self-reported experienced stress.
4 months after baseline
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20)
Time Frame: 8 months after baseline
The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20) is the abbreviated 20-item version of the PSQ (Levenstein et al., 1993) and assesses self-reported experienced stress.
8 months after baseline
Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20)
Time Frame: 14 months after baseline (follow-up)
The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ20) is the abbreviated 20-item version of the PSQ (Levenstein et al., 1993) and assesses self-reported experienced stress.
14 months after baseline (follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hansjoerg Znoj, Prof. Dr. phil., Dep. of clinical psychology and psychotherapy, University of Berne
  • Principal Investigator: Eveline Frischknecht, lic. phil., Dep. of clinical psychology and psychotherapy, University of Berne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Internet-based supportive coaching OSCAR

Subscribe