Efficacy and Safety of Alfacalcidol Compared to Calcitriol for Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

May 1, 2010 updated by: Mahidol University

A Randomized Trial Comparing Pulse Calcitriol and Alfacalcidol for the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Hemodialysis Patients

This study was performed to determine whether calcitriol provides a therapeutic advantage to alfacalcidol for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in ESRD patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Secondary hyperparathyroidism has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).Both nonselective and selective vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) are demonstrated in many studies for their efficacy on suppression of PTH. Most of them are quite expensive and unavailable in many countries. Calcitriol and alfacalcidol are less expensive and worldwidely distributed. There is only one short-term study which directly compares these two drugs. This study demonstrates that calcitriol is superior to alfacalcidol. However, alfacalcidol is a prohormone of calcitriol. It has to be converted by 25-hydroxylase at the liver to generate 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 to act on target cells. Many pharmacokinetics studies demonstrate that alfacalcidol has lower AUC compared to calcitriol if they are administered in the same dose. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that alfacalcidol may be equivalently efficacious as calcitriol if its dose is adjusted according to the pharmacokinetics studies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bangkok
      • Bangkok-noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Siriraj Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic hemodialysis patients who underwent scheduled hemodialysis for at least 3 months with secondary hyperparathyroidism (intact PTH levels > 300 pg/mL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) age < 18 years (2) hypersensitivity to calcitriol or alfacalcidol (3) inadequate dialysis [defined as single-pooled Kt/V (sp-Kt/V) <1.2 and <2.0 for thrice a week and twice a week hemodialysis] (4) corrected serum calcium >10.2 mg/dL or serum phosphate >6 mg/dL after adjusting dialysate calcium and phosphate binders (5) diameter of parathyroid gland >10 mm (6) pregnancy or lactation (7) liver cirrhosis (8) active kidney transplantation (9) previous parathyroidectomy (10) malignancy or chronic infection/inflammation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: calcitriol
The subjects were randomized to receive calcitriol in a dose-escalating fashion for up to 24 weeks.
The initial dose of alfacalcidol was twice that of calcitriol.Both were adjusted to control intact PTH within the ranges of 150-300 pg/ml.
Experimental: alfacalcidol
The initial dose of alfacalcidol was twice that of calcitriol.Both were adjusted to control intact PTH within the ranges of 150-300 pg/ml.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction of intact parathyroid hormone levels
Time Frame: 48 weeks
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia
Time Frame: 48 weeks
proportion of the patients who achieved a target PTH, changes in plasma calcium and phosphorus, the proportion of the patients who had hypercalcemia (plasma corrected calcium > 10.8 mg/dl), hyperphosphatemia (plasma phosphorus > 6.0 mg/dl) and calcium-phosphorus products > 55 mg2/dl2 between groups.
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2010

Last Verified

May 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End Stage Renal Disease

Clinical Trials on alfacalcidol and calcitriol

Subscribe