Effect of Alfacalcidol on Muscle Function in Osteoporosis Patients

February 21, 2024 updated by: Yonsei University

Effect of Alfacalcidol on Muscle Function in Osteoporosis Patients; Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to investigate the potential improvement in muscle function, compared to the placebo group, through the concurrent administration of denosumab and alfacalcidol over a one-year period in postmenopausal women with functional sarcopenia and osteoporosis aged 65 and older. The study is planned as a double-blinded randomized controlled trial, intending to recruit a total of 340 participants. Primary outcome is the improvement in SPPB score of 0.5 or more compared to the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This trial is a double-blind, randomized phase 4 trial to evaluate whether alfacalcidol co-administration improves muscle function compared to the placebo group in functional sarcopenia women over 65 years of age who are taking denosumab for osteoporosis. This trial consists of four trial periods (Screening Visit 1, Baseline Visit 2, Visit 3 (26 weeks), and Visit 4 (52 weeks).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

340

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Yumie Rhee
  • Phone Number: +82-02-2228-1973
  • Email: yumie@yuhs.ac

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Division of Endocrinology, Department of internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Females aged 65 and above. 2) Individuals with osteoporosis who are either currently on denosumab or planning to initiate denosumab treatment.

    3) Participants committed to a minimum of 1-year denosumab treatment. 4) Those who have not taken any active vitamin D supplements within 3 months prior to the baseline visit (Visit 2).

    5) Participants capable of walking. 6-1) Individuals with SPPB ≤ 9 meeting the criteria for low physical performance.

6-2) Individuals with SPPB scores of 10 or 11 and concurrently exhibiting low muscle strength (hand grip strength < 18kg) or gait speed < 1.0 m/s or chair stand test > 11s (sitting position) or a history of fractures (excluding skull, cervical spine, fingers, toes, and rib fractures) or a fall within the past year.

7) Individuals who have undergone DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry) within 6 months of the baseline visit (Visit 2).

8) Participants who, after receiving a detailed explanation of the clinical trial, have fully understood it, voluntarily decided to participate, and provided written consent to participate while agreeing to adhere to the precautions

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals contraindicated for active vitamin D supplementation:

    • Patients with hypercalcemia or hyperphosphatemia. ② Those with a history of urolithiasis/nephrolithiasis.
  2. Individuals contraindicated for denosumab treatment:

    ① Those planning or with unresolved invasive dental procedures such as extractions, dental implants, or oral surgery.

    • Individuals with hypoalbuminemia-corrected serum calcium outside the normal range.
  3. Individuals with vitamin D deficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration below 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L).
  4. Participants who have received continuous prednisolone (or equivalent glucocorticoid) at a dose of 5 mg or higher per day for at least 90 days within 6 months of the screening visit (Visit 1).
  5. Individuals with severe malnutrition, indicated by a serum albumin level of 3.0 mg/dL or below.
  6. Those in an acute immobility state due to reasons such as fracture, hospitalization, or surgery within 1 month of the baseline visit (Visit 2).
  7. Individuals with severe underlying conditions:

    ① Patients with metastatic cancer.

    ② Those with severe renal impairment (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; eGFR) less than 15 mL/min/1.73m² or undergoing dialysis.

    ③ Individuals receiving oxygen therapy due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

    ④ Those with decompensated liver cirrhosis and severe liver disease with complications due to portal hypertension

  8. Individuals with physical limitations due to specific conditions other than muscle decline: ① Those incapable of communication, including severe dementia. ② Individuals undergoing drug therapy for neuro-muscular disorders such as Parkinson's disease or severe myasthenia.
  9. Individuals with an SPPB score of 12, indicating no impairment in physical function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: alfacalcidol
alfacalcidol plus denosumab
Subjects assigned to arm 1 take two doses of alfacalcidol once a day for a total of 52 weeks from the day after baseline visit 2 to the day before the end of the test (visit 4).
denosumab
Placebo Comparator: placebo
placebo + denosumab
denosumab
Subjects assigned to arm 2 take two doses of placebo once a day for a total of 52 weeks from the day after baseline visit 2 to the day before the end of the test (visit 4).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in SPPB score of 0.5 or more compared to the control group
Time Frame: one year
Our study aim is to demonstrate the improvement in SPPB(Short physical performace battery) score of 0.5 or more in the alfacalcidol group compared to the placebo group.
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on alfacalcidol

3
Subscribe