- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01126268
Twice Daily Altabax Application for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Soft Tissue Infection
January 20, 2016 updated by: Adelaide Hebert, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to document the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of retapamulin in the treatment of subjects with bacterial infections, including impetigo, folliculitis, and minor soft tissue infections including secondarily infected eczema presumed to be caused by methicillin resistant Staph aureus.
Male and female patients ages 9 months to 98 years will be recruited from a university based dermatology clinic.
Upon enrollment, wound cultures will be collected, and then subjects will apply topical retapamulin twice daily for five days.
The primary endpoint will be resolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection based on clinical presentation and physical exam, as well as bacteriological efficacy based on culture results.
It is anticipated that approximately 75 patients will be enrolled, with expectation that approximately 50 of these patients will have MRSA infections.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
38
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Houston Medical Center Building
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
2 years to 94 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients from 9 months of age up to 98 years of age.
- Clinical diagnosis of impetigo, folliculitis, or minor soft tissue infection including secondarily infected eczema presumed to be caused by Staphylococcus aureus.
- The patient, and if applicable the parent or guardian, is able to give informed consent
- Females of child bearing potential have a negative urine pregnancy test.
- Patient, and if applicable parent or guardian, are willing to and capable of complying with the study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject who has used a topical antibacterial medication to the area being treated within the last 48 hours.
- Subject who has been enrolled in a clinical trial within the last 30 days.
- Subject with signs of systemic infection (such as fever), or with evidence of abscess or cellulitis at the site to be treated.
- Subject has a bacterial skin infection which would not be appropriately treated by a topical antibiotic in the opinion of the investigator
- Subjects who have taken oral antibiotics within the last 7 days.
- Subjects with known sensitivity to the study medication.
- The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Retapamulin ointment 1%
|
Retapamulin ointment, applied topically twice daily for five days
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Whose Wound Cultures Were Positive for MRSA and Who Were Determined to be a Clinical Success at the Follow-up Visit
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Clinical success is defined as no further signs or symptoms of infection present, including erythema, purulence, crusting, edema, warmth and pain.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Response at Follow up as Assessed by a Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Clinical response was based on clinical evaluation by the investigator at the follow-up visit using a predefined scale with the following categories: (1) clinical success, (2) clinical improvement, (3) no change, (4) clinical failure, and (5) unable to determine.
Patients who were designated as clinical success as defined in number 1 above were considered a true "clinical success" while all others were considered a "clinical failure."
Patients were classified with an outcome of "unable to determine" if they missed their follow-up visit or refused clinical examination.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Microbiologic Response at Follow up as Assessed by a Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Microbiological response was determined by the investigator at the follow-up visit using the following microbiological outcomes: (1) microbological eradication, (2) presumed microbiological eradication, (3) presumed microbiological improvement, (4) microbiological persistence, (5) presumed microbiological persistence, (6) unable to determine, (7) new pathogen, and (8) colonization.
Patients who were designated microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological improvement, or colonization as defined in numbers 1, 2, 3, and 8 above were considered a "microbiological success" while all others were considered "microbiological failure."
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Number of Participants Who Were a Therapeutic Success
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Therapeutic response was determined from the clinical response and the microbiological response.
Patients who qualified as both a "clinical success" and a "microbiological success" were deemed a "therapeutic success," and all others were deemed "therapeutic failures."
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Erythema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
baseline
|
|
Erythema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Purulence (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
baseline
|
|
Purulence (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Crusting (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
baseline
|
|
Crusting (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Tissue Edema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
baseline
|
|
Tissue Edema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Tissue Warmth (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
baseline
|
|
Tissue Warmth (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Pain (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
baseline
|
|
Pain (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Wound Size at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
|
Wound size area was determined by measuring the greatest length of the wound in two perpendicular dimensions with a standard metric ruler.
The two measurements were multiplied together to provide an estimate of the overall wound size.
Surrounding erythema was not included in the measurement.
|
baseline
|
|
Wound Size at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Wound size area was determined by measuring the greatest length of the wound in two perpendicular dimensions with a standard metric ruler.
The two measurements were multiplied together to provide an estimate of the overall wound size.
Surrounding erythema was not included in the measurement.
|
6 to 8 days after treatment
|
|
Number of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event (AE)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
AEs included burning at application site, upper respiratory infection, furuncle, cough, and a rash at a site other than the application site.
See the Adverse Events section for more detailed information.
|
baseline to 6 to 8 days after treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Adelaide A Hebert, M.D., University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Department of Dermatology
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2012
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 18, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
May 19, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
February 17, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 20, 2016
Last Verified
January 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Skin Diseases
- Disease Attributes
- Bacterial Infections
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
- Streptococcal Infections
- Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
- Skin Diseases, Infectious
- Staphylococcal Infections
- Skin Diseases, Bacterial
- Dermatitis
- Skin Diseases, Eczematous
- Hair Diseases
- Staphylococcal Skin Infections
- Infections
- Communicable Diseases
- Eczema
- Soft Tissue Infections
- Folliculitis
- Impetigo
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Retapamulin
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-09-0650
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Folliculitis
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityCompleted
-
Wayne Fujita, M.D.CompletedPityrosporum FolliculitisUnited States
-
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityHefei CAS Ion Medical and Technical Devices Co.,LtdCompleted
-
Cynosure, Inc.CompletedHair Removal | Pseudo Folliculitis Barbae | Benign Vascular Lesion | Pigmented LesionsUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemUnknownAcne Keloidalis Nuchae | NdYag Laser | AKN | Acne Keloidalis | AK | Dermatitis Papillaris Capillitii | Folliculitis Keloidalis Nuchae | Sycosis Nuchae | Acne Keloid | Keloidal Folliculitis | Lichen Keloidalis Nuchae | Folliculitis Nuchae Scleroticans | Sycosis FramboesiformisUnited States
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedFolliculitis | DandruffKorea, Republic of
-
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Per PfeifferCompleted
-
Azidus BrasilSuspended
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedStaphylococcus Aureus | Folliculitis DecalvansFrance
Clinical Trials on Retapamulin (Altabax)
-
Derm Research, PLLCGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedAtopic Dermatitis | Secondary InfectionUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus AureusUnited States
-
Bay Pines VA Healthcare SystemWithdrawnOrthopedic Procedures | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus AureusUnited States
-
Ochsner Health SystemGlaxoSmithKline; Tulane University School of MedicineWithdrawnMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus AureusUnited States
-
Gary GoldenbergCompletedHand Eczema | Foot EczemaUnited States
-
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterGlaxoSmithKlineWithdrawn
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedSkin Infections, BacterialUnited States, Germany, Taiwan, Netherlands, Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, South Africa, Mexico
-
Ferrer Internacional S.A.CompletedEfficacy and Safety of Ozenoxacin 1% Cream Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With ImpetigoImpetigoGermany, South Africa
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedSkin Infections, BacterialUnited States, South Africa, India, Argentina, Brazil
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States