Twice Daily Altabax Application for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Soft Tissue Infection

January 20, 2016 updated by: Adelaide Hebert, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to document the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of retapamulin in the treatment of subjects with bacterial infections, including impetigo, folliculitis, and minor soft tissue infections including secondarily infected eczema presumed to be caused by methicillin resistant Staph aureus. Male and female patients ages 9 months to 98 years will be recruited from a university based dermatology clinic. Upon enrollment, wound cultures will be collected, and then subjects will apply topical retapamulin twice daily for five days. The primary endpoint will be resolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection based on clinical presentation and physical exam, as well as bacteriological efficacy based on culture results. It is anticipated that approximately 75 patients will be enrolled, with expectation that approximately 50 of these patients will have MRSA infections.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Medical Center Building

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 94 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients from 9 months of age up to 98 years of age.
  • Clinical diagnosis of impetigo, folliculitis, or minor soft tissue infection including secondarily infected eczema presumed to be caused by Staphylococcus aureus.
  • The patient, and if applicable the parent or guardian, is able to give informed consent
  • Females of child bearing potential have a negative urine pregnancy test.
  • Patient, and if applicable parent or guardian, are willing to and capable of complying with the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who has used a topical antibacterial medication to the area being treated within the last 48 hours.
  • Subject who has been enrolled in a clinical trial within the last 30 days.
  • Subject with signs of systemic infection (such as fever), or with evidence of abscess or cellulitis at the site to be treated.
  • Subject has a bacterial skin infection which would not be appropriately treated by a topical antibiotic in the opinion of the investigator
  • Subjects who have taken oral antibiotics within the last 7 days.
  • Subjects with known sensitivity to the study medication.
  • The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Retapamulin ointment 1%
Retapamulin ointment, applied topically twice daily for five days
Other Names:
  • Altabax

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Whose Wound Cultures Were Positive for MRSA and Who Were Determined to be a Clinical Success at the Follow-up Visit
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Clinical success is defined as no further signs or symptoms of infection present, including erythema, purulence, crusting, edema, warmth and pain.
6 to 8 days after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response at Follow up as Assessed by a Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Clinical response was based on clinical evaluation by the investigator at the follow-up visit using a predefined scale with the following categories: (1) clinical success, (2) clinical improvement, (3) no change, (4) clinical failure, and (5) unable to determine. Patients who were designated as clinical success as defined in number 1 above were considered a true "clinical success" while all others were considered a "clinical failure." Patients were classified with an outcome of "unable to determine" if they missed their follow-up visit or refused clinical examination.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Microbiologic Response at Follow up as Assessed by a Rating Scale
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Microbiological response was determined by the investigator at the follow-up visit using the following microbiological outcomes: (1) microbological eradication, (2) presumed microbiological eradication, (3) presumed microbiological improvement, (4) microbiological persistence, (5) presumed microbiological persistence, (6) unable to determine, (7) new pathogen, and (8) colonization. Patients who were designated microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological eradication, presumed microbiological improvement, or colonization as defined in numbers 1, 2, 3, and 8 above were considered a "microbiological success" while all others were considered "microbiological failure."
6 to 8 days after treatment
Number of Participants Who Were a Therapeutic Success
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Therapeutic response was determined from the clinical response and the microbiological response. Patients who qualified as both a "clinical success" and a "microbiological success" were deemed a "therapeutic success," and all others were deemed "therapeutic failures."
6 to 8 days after treatment
Erythema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
baseline
Erythema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Purulence (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
baseline
Purulence (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Crusting (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
baseline
Crusting (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Tissue Edema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
baseline
Tissue Edema (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Tissue Warmth (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
baseline
Tissue Warmth (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Pain (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
baseline
Pain (Sign and Symptom of Infection) at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Signs and symptoms of infection were classified as one of the following: absent, minimal, moderate, or severe.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Wound Size at Baseline
Time Frame: baseline
Wound size area was determined by measuring the greatest length of the wound in two perpendicular dimensions with a standard metric ruler. The two measurements were multiplied together to provide an estimate of the overall wound size. Surrounding erythema was not included in the measurement.
baseline
Wound Size at Follow up
Time Frame: 6 to 8 days after treatment
Wound size area was determined by measuring the greatest length of the wound in two perpendicular dimensions with a standard metric ruler. The two measurements were multiplied together to provide an estimate of the overall wound size. Surrounding erythema was not included in the measurement.
6 to 8 days after treatment
Number of Participants Reporting Any Adverse Event (AE)
Time Frame: baseline to 6 to 8 days after treatment
AEs included burning at application site, upper respiratory infection, furuncle, cough, and a rash at a site other than the application site. See the Adverse Events section for more detailed information.
baseline to 6 to 8 days after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adelaide A Hebert, M.D., University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Department of Dermatology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Folliculitis

Clinical Trials on Retapamulin (Altabax)

Subscribe