Effectiveness of a Ready-to-Use-Food (RUF) Supplement to Prevent Acute Child Malnutrition (PREAMA)

October 10, 2011 updated by: Lieven Huybregts, Action Contre la Faim

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Ready-to-Use-Food (RUF) Supplement to Prevent Acute Malnutrition in Children Between 6-36 Months in Urban Chad

The overall objective of this project is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of RUF (ready-to-Use Food, Plumpy Doz(r)) to prevent moderate acute malnutrition in children aged 6-36 months if embedded in a program of conditional household food assistance.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Abéché, Chad
        • Action Contre La Faim Tchad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 months to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • WH≥80% of median of NCHS reference without bilateral pitting oedema;
  • Age ≥ 6 months and ≤36 months;
  • Member of a household with a dependency ratio >4;
  • Not planning to leave the study zone for the coming 5 months;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not showing appetite;
  • Age < 6 months or age > 36 months
  • Weight-for-Height Z-score <-2 and/or the presence of bilateral pitting oedema in children 6-36 months;
  • Member of a household with a dependency ration ≤ 4;
  • Clinical complications
  • Presence of chronic illness, cardiac disease, congenital abnormalities, cancer;
  • Being allergic to one of the ingredients of the RUF.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Food-for-Training component
Conditional family food supplementation (sugar, sorghum, beans, iodized salt, vegetable oil) 1800 kcal/person/day in function of attendance and participation in a sensitization program covering various themes on household, water and disease management, hygiene promotion, sanitation and dietary practices for children.
Conditional family food supplementation (sugar, sorghum, beans, iodized salt, vegetable oil) 1800 kcal/person/day in function of attendance and participation in a sensitization program covering various themes on household, water and disease management, hygiene promotion, sanitation and dietary practices for children.
Experimental: Food-for-Training + RUF (Plumpy Doz(r))

Conditional family food supplementation (sugar, sorghum, beans, iodized salt, vegetable oil) 1800 kcal/person/day in function of attendance and participation in a sensitization program covering various themes on household, water and disease management, hygiene promotion, sanitation and dietary practices for children.

In addition, a blanket supplementation with 47g RUF (Plumpy Doz(r)) per day per child is provided.

Conditional family food supplementation (sugar, sorghum, beans, iodized salt, vegetable oil) 1800 kcal/person/day in function of attendance and participation in a sensitization program covering various themes on household, water and disease management, hygiene promotion, sanitation and dietary practices for children.
47g Plumpy Doz(r) per day per child

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cumulative wasting incidence, hemoglobin concentration
Time Frame: monthly
monthly

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
weight gain
Time Frame: monthly
monthly
time to become wasted
Time Frame: monthly
monthly
default rate
Time Frame: monthly
monthly
RUF acceptability
Time Frame: monthly
monthly
dietary intake
Time Frame: monthly
monthly

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Kolsteren, PhD MD, University Ghent
  • Principal Investigator: Lieven Huybregts, PhD, University Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UGENT0410

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child

Clinical Trials on Food-for-Training

3
Subscribe