Effect of Beta Blockade on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Function in Moderate to Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Regurgitation (BAR)

September 24, 2014 updated by: Stig Urheim, Oslo University Hospital
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of beta-blocker on left ventricular (LV) remodeling in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The left ventricle responds to the volume load of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) with a series of compensatory mechanisms, including an increase in end-diastolic volume, an increase in chamber compliance that accommodates the increased volume without an increase in filling pressures, and a combination of eccentric and concentric hypertrophy. The greater diastolic volume permits the ventricle to eject a large total stroke volume to maintain forward stroke volume in the normal range. This is accomplished through rearrangement of myocardial fibers with the addition of new sarcomeres and development of eccentric LV hypertrophy. As a consequence left ventricular ejection fraction will remain in the normal range.

The clinical course of chronic aortic regurgitation is characterized by a prolonged phase of stability during which the left ventricle adapts to the volume overload. Eventually myocardial failure ensues through a series of complex events that include changes in myocyte phenotype due to re-expression of fetal genes, cellular apoptosis alteration in the expression and function of contractile proteins and changes in the extracellular matrix.

The role of long-term vasodilator therapy in the care of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation is controversial. Vasodilator therapy has been used to reduce the regurgitant volume, afterload, left ventricular volumes, and wall stress in an effort to preserve left ventricular function and reduce left ventricular mass. Thus time to surgical intervention has been found to be delayed by calcium antagonists, ACE-inhibitors and hydralazine, while a more recent study did not find any effect of nifedipine or enalapril on time to surgery or left ventricular volume and function.

The decision to recommend operative intervention to the asymptomatic patient with chronic, severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is very difficult because aortic valve replacement (AVR) continues to entail immediate risk, and biologic and mechanical valves still have problems resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, the mortality rate in asymptomatic patients with AR is very low, and surgery does not improve the quality of life. Thus, the indication in asymptomatic patients must be delayed until changes occur that will predict an increased risk of operative or long-term death after AVR. At present indication for aortic valve replacement is development of symptoms, an increase in left ventricular volume or a decline in left ventricular function.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency
  • Asymptomatic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Arrhythmia
  • Other severe valve disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Patients with moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency will be randomized to Placebo
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Metoprolol
Patients with moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency will be randomized to Metoprolol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Left ventricular end-systolic volume
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Metoprolol

Subscribe