Safety of 24-hour Infusion of ON 01910.Na in Combination With Gemcitabine in Advanced Solid Tumors

June 22, 2017 updated by: Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.

Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Gemcitabine and 24 Hour Infusion of ON 01910.Na in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

Treatment of cancer is often more effective when two or more drugs are used together. For example, when gemcitabine, an approved drug, and ON 01910.Na, a new investigational anti-cancer drug, are used together to treat cancer cells in laboratory animals, there is more inhibition of the growth of the cancer cells compared to either drug used by itself. These results offer promise that gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na could be used to treat cancer in patients. However, before studies that seek to find out if gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na is an effective combination in patients can be done, doctors must first know what is largest, safe dose of ON 01910.Na that can be used in combination with gemcitabine and what is the best regimen to use. This study is designed to answer that question.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The order of infusion will be gemcitabine first, immediately followed by ON 01910.Na (with the only exception being the first infusion for those patients undergoing PK sampling; where the ON 01910.Na infusion will be given first on this occasion). The dose of gemcitabine will be fixed at 1000 mg/m2 i.v. as a 30 minutes infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. As of Amendment 2, the starting dose of ON 01910.Na is 250 mg/m2 as a 24 hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day course. The dose of ON 01910.Na will be escalated in increments in successive cohorts (dose level (DL) 1 = 250 mg/m2, DL 2 = 650 mg/m2, DL 3 = 1050 mg/m2, DL 4= 1350 mg/m2) of new patients. A course is defined as 4 weeks in length. Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v3.0). A minimum of three new patients will be treated at each dose level with a minimum of a 1 week stagger between the dosing of the first and remaining patients in each new dose cohort. In exceptional circumstances (e.g. where there is one slot available in a cohort and two eligible patients have been screened), the Sponsor may allow four patients to enter a cohort (or seven patients to enter an expanded cohort). A DL -1A (ON 01910.Na = 125 mg/m2) is set in case dose de-escalation is required with the starting dose due to ON 01910.Na-related toxicity. A DL -1A gemcitabine = 750 mg/m2 and DL - 1B at 500 mg/m2 are set in case dose de-escalation is required with the starting and subsequent doses due to gemcitabine-related toxicity. If DLT is not observed in the first three patients, then the dose of ON 01910.Na will be increased to the next level. If DLT occurs in any of the first three new patients in the first course, at least three additional new patients will be treated. If no further DLT is encountered, dose escalation will proceed. Alternately, if DLT is noted in one or more of three additional patients, dose escalation will be terminated and the MTD will be defined as the highest dose level at which none of the first three patients or no more than one of six patients experienced DLT in course 1. All patients receiving doses exceeding the confirmed MTD will have their dose reduced to the MTD; even if apparently tolerating their current dose. Intra-patient dose escalation of ON 01910.Na will be permitted. There will be no limit to the number of courses that could be administered to a patient who is both tolerating and benefiting from therapy.

Escalation to the next dose level will occur only after the third evaluable patient (or sixth, if an expanded cohort), on the previous dose level has been observed for 4 weeks. Dose escalation decisions will be made by a Cohort Review Committee (CRC). Intra-patient dose escalation of ON 01910.Na will be allowed after the third evaluable patient on the next dose level has been observed for 4 weeks with acceptable tolerability.

Once the MTD has been defined, an expanded cohort of 9 to 12 additional patients (depending if 3 or 6 patients were enrolled on the previous cohort) will be enrolled at the MTD dose level in order to further define the safety and tolerability of this regimen, and characterize the pharmacokinetics of ON 01910.Na alone and after gemcitabine, and perform a tumor biomarker study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Albert Einstein Cancer Center/Montefiore Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with histologically confirmed solid malignancy for which standard curative or palliative measures do not exist or are no longer effective; or patients with a clinical rationale for a gemcitabine-based therapy.
  • The last radiotherapy/chemotherapy dose must have been given ≥4 weeks prior to study drug initiation; with any acute or chronic adverse events of prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy having resolved to <Grade 2 as determined by CTCAE v3.0 (Appendix IV).
  • Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks and an ECOG performance status of <1 (Appendix I).
  • Patients must be >18 years of age.
  • Patients must have evaluable disease, either with informative tumor markers or with measurable disease on imaging by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria (Appendix II).
  • Patients must have adequate liver and renal function as defined by serum creatinine no greater than 2.0 times the institution's upper normal limits (or a 24 hour creatinine clearance of >50 ml/min) and total bilirubin level no greater than 2.0 times the institution's upper normal limits and transaminase levels no higher than 3.0 times the institution's upper normal limits. (Note that patients with primary liver cancer or hepatic metastases may have transaminase levels of up to 5.0 times the limit of normal).
  • Patients must have adequate bone marrow function as defined by a granulocyte count of >1,500/mm3, platelet count of >100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin >9 g/dl.
  • Patients at the expanded phase at the MTD must be willing and able to undergo blood sampling for pharmacokinetic studies in Course 1.
  • For patients in the expanded phase at the MTD, tumor amenable to a single tumor biopsy, and willingness to undergo a baseline tumor biopsy.
  • Patients must sign an informed consent form indicating that they are aware of the investigational nature of this study and in keeping with the policies of the institution.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if they have evidence of active heart disease including myocardial infarction within the previous 3 months; symptomatic coronary insufficiency or heart block; uncontrolled congestive heart failure; moderate or severe pulmonary dysfunction.
  • Patients will be excluded if they have an active infectious process.
  • Patients will be excluded if they have active central nervous system metastases.
  • Patients will be excluded if they have received prior radiotherapy administered to more than 30% of marrow-bearing bone mass.
  • Patients will be excluded if they have ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis for more than twice a month or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of <134 Meq/L).
  • Patients will be excluded if they are women who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Patients will be excluded if they are male patients with female sexual partners who are unwilling to follow the strict contraception requirements described in this protocol.
  • Patients will be excluded if they have had major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of ON 01910.Na treatment start.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events and Laboratory Parameters
Time Frame: Throughout study
Incidence of adverse signs and/or symptoms (adverse events and laboratory parameters)
Throughout study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetics
Time Frame: MTD confirmation phase of study
The derived plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of ON 01910.Na administered alone and with gemcitabine at the MTD will also be investigated: Cmax, tmax, terminal half-life, AUC0-last, AUC0-inf., CL, and Vss.
MTD confirmation phase of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sridhar Mani, MD, Albert Einstein College Of Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Pamela N. Munster, MD, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumor

Clinical Trials on ON 01910.Na

3
Subscribe