Safety of ON 01910.Na as a 3-day Infusion in Patients With Advanced Cancer

June 22, 2017 updated by: Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.

Phase I Dose Escalation Study of ON 01910.Na by 3-day Continuous Infusion in Patients With Advanced Cancer

The primary objective of this study is to determine the largest dose of ON 01910.Na (rigosertib sodium) that can be given safely as a 3-day continuous infusion once every 2 weeks (2-week cycle) in patients with advanced cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was an open-label, single-center, dose-escalating Phase I study to determine the Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RPTD) of ON 01910.Na (rigosertib sodium) administered as a 3 day continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion every 2 weeks (2-week cycles) to up to 28 patients with advanced cancer (12 to 16 in the dose escalation phase and up to 12 additional patients in the dose confirmation phase). The dosing of rigosertib was based on body surface area (BSA), with a starting dose of 50 mg/m2/24 hour for 3 consecutive days.

In the absence of toxicity after at least a 3-week observation period, rigosertib doses were escalated following a Fibonacci scheme with an initial accelerated dose-escalation phase in which 1-patient cohorts received rigosertib for 3 weeks until drug-related Grade 2 toxicity (according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v.3), excluding alopecia, occurred, at which time 2 additional patients were added to subsequent cohorts. If none of the 3 patients in the cohort experienced DLTs, the dose was escalated by a half-Fibonacci step. If a DLT was seen in the first patient of a cohort, dosing went back a half-step. The next dose level occurred if no DLT was reported in the 3 patients or if no more than 1 DLT occurred in an expanded cohort of 6 patients. If a DLT was seen in 1 of the 3 patients, 3 additional patients were enrolled in the cohort. If DLTs were seen in 2 of 6 patients in a cohort, dose escalation was stopped.

Once the maximum administered dose (MAD) was attained and the RPTD was determined, the dose escalation phase was considered complete. Up to 12 additional patients with histologically confirmed malignant tumors were tested at the RPTD dose to confirm its appropriateness.

Secondary objectives were to determine the qualitative and quantitative toxicity and reversibility of toxicity of rigosertib administered in this fashion; to investigate the clinical pharmacology of rigosertib when administered in this fashion, including plasma pharmacokinetics at each dose level; to confirm the appropriateness of the RPTD; to document any observed antitumor activity of rigosertib; and, to evaluate the biological effect of rigosertib in biomarkers in serum and/or peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have histologically confirmed malignancy that is metastatic or unresectable and for which standard curative or palliative measures do not exist or are no longer effective.
  • At least 4 weeks since the last dose of other potentially myelosuppressive treatment (at least 6 weeks since last dose of nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) and recovery from manifestations of reversible drug toxicity (except alopecia, stable residual neuropathy, and residual hand and foot syndrome). Among patients with prior doxorubicin chemotherapy, only those with no more than 450 mg/m2 of the drug will be entered. It must be at least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy, 6 weeks if the last regimen included nitrosoureas or mitomycin C.
  • Patients with prior radiotherapy are eligible provided that a minimum of 4 weeks have passed and that the maximal area of hematopoietic active bone marrow treated was less than 25%.
  • ECOG performance status < 2.
  • Hgb > 10 gm/dl
  • WBC > 4,000 per microliter
  • Absolute neutrophil count > 1,500 per microliter
  • Platelets >100,000 per microliter
  • Total bilirubin within normal institutional limits
  • AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) values within limits defined by Protocol
  • Creatinine within normal institutional limits or creatinine clearance >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal.
  • Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Inclusion Criteria - Dose Confirmation Phase Same inclusion criteria as in the Dose Escalation phase described above, except Patients must have an ECOG performance of 0 or 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had recent major surgery (within the past 14 days), chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events (except alopecia, stable residual neuropathy, and residual hand and foot syndrome) due to previously administered agents.
  • Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents or concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal treatments, or immunotherapy while on study.
  • Patients with known or clinical evidence of central nervous system metastasis, except brain metastases that have been previously removed or irradiated and currently have no clinical impact.
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to ON 01910.Na.
  • The patient should have no major 3rd space fluid, ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis, peripheral bilateral edema, or hyponatremia (serum sodium value less than 134 Meq/L).
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, bleeding, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant and nursing women are excluded from this study.
  • HIV-positive patients receiving combination anti-retroviral therapy are excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: 28 days after start of first administration of ON 01910.Na

DLTs are defined as:

  • Grade 3 non-hematological toxicity other than nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, stomatitis, esophagitis/dysphagia.
  • Grade 3 nausea and vomiting uncontrolled by antiemetics; Grade 3 diarrhea uncontrolled by antidiarrheal agents; Grade 3 drug-induced fever uncontrolled by antipyretics.
  • Grade 3 stomatitis and/or esophagitis/dysphagia lasting >3 days.
  • Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia lasting >5 days.
  • Episode of neutropenic fever, as defined in Protocol.
  • Failure to recover neutrophils (>1,500 per microliter) or platelets (>75,000 per microliter) by day 28.
28 days after start of first administration of ON 01910.Na

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship of Adverse Events (AEs) to Study Treatment
Time Frame: 30 days after last infusion of study drug
Relationship assessed as Not related, Unlikely, Possibly, Probably, or, Definitely according to Guidance in Appendix II of Protocol.
30 days after last infusion of study drug
Change in size of target lesions recorded at baseline
Time Frame: 30 days after last infusion of study drug
The same method of assessment for each identified and recorded lesion will be used at baseline and each follow-up.
30 days after last infusion of study drug
Number of Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: 30 days after last infusion of study drug
All adverse events (except grade 1 and 2 laboratory abnormalities that do not require an intervention), regardless of causal relationship, are recorded in the case report form and source documentation.
30 days after last infusion of study drug
Severity of Adverse Events
Time Frame: 30 days after last infusion of study drug
Severity of AEs are determined according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0.
30 days after last infusion of study drug
Concentration of ON 01910.Na in plasma versus time
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours after end of infusion of study drug in Cycles 1 and 4
Blood samples for subsequent preparation of plasma and determination of concentration of ON 01910.Na will be collected at pre-dose at 1 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr and 72 hr (10 min, prior to completion of infusion). After the completion of the infusion, samples will be collected at 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr.
Up to 72 hours after end of infusion of study drug in Cycles 1 and 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Takao Ohnuma, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on rigosertib sodium

3
Subscribe