- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01181076
Individualized Nutrition for Adult Recipients of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants - Effect on Quality of Life (NASQ)
Aim
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) combined with several cycles of intensive chemotherapy is the only curative treatment for several malignant blood diseases. Most allo-SCT patients who are treated with intensive chemotherapy often have reduced nutritional status. Several studies have evaluated the effect of different nutrition intervention for allo-SCT patients, but there have not been found evidence-based recommendations for energy requirements, use of enteral nutrition (EN) and/or parenteral nutrition (PN). We are not aware of studies using QoL as end-point among allo-SCT patients allocated to specific nutrition intervention.
Main hypothesis:
Patients who receive individualized nutrition have better "global" QoL assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-HDC29 tool three months after SCT
Sub-hypotheses:
Patients who receive individualized nutrition have:
i) less often oral mucositis grade 3-4. ii) better nutrition status iii) decreased length of hospital stay, less episodes with fever, earlier engraftment and less often acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grade 3-4, and iv) better main QoL scores on the scale for physical and social functions, fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea three months after allogeneic SCT, compared to the control group.
Patients and methods A minimum sample of 100 patients will be included in the study. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly assigned to the intervention- or control group. The patients in the intervention group will receive a therapeutic diet in combination with tube feeding with an additional PN if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values. The patients in the control group will receive nutrition support after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients and methods
A minimum sample of 100 patients will be included in the study. This is the result of a power calculation where a difference of 15 of global QoL is the primary end-point. All patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria and are offered allo-SCT with myeloablative condition are invited to participate in the study about 1-3 months before commencing the treatment. The patients have to give their written informed consent to participate in the study. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly assigned in blocks to the intervention- or control group. The main end-point is three months after SCT. We will follow the patients throughout the first year after SCT.
Nutrition intervention
The interventions start when the patients are arriving at the hospital for SCT and consist of individualized nutrition supplement for each patient until discharge. The severity of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and mouth soreness will be a measure of the administration route of nutrition (oral, PN and/or EN). The energy requirements will be calculated and the intake monitored. The energy intake will continuously be adjusted to the energy requirements. The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched. The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation. EN will be given when oral intake discontinue, and an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values. Dislodged tubes will promptly be replaced until two times in the stomach. If the tube dislodge for more than two times, or voluminous diarrhea appears, or the patients refuse the tube, the patients will be nourished by the PN route only. The patients in the intervention group will receive dietary recommendation before leaving the hospital. The patients in the control group will be nourished after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route. Naso-jejunal tube will not be inserted and enteral nutrition will not be given.
Measurement of quality of life, mucositis and nutrition status
The patients score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 form at admission, i.e. 8 days prior to SCT, then after 3 and 6 weeks and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. At the same time we will measure the following several markers of nutritional status and parameters of hemostasis. We will also record routine clinical parameters as well as anthropometry and body composition using electrical bioimpedance. WHO Oral Toxicity Grading Scale will be used to measure oral mucositis. In addition we will use the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway, 0027
- Oslo University Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- acute lymphatic leukaemia, acute myeloid leukaemia, chronic myeloproliferative disease and chronic myelogenous leukaemia and other disorders accepted for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, following myeloablative conditioning
Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to give informed consent
- unable to adhere to protocol due to reasons unrelated to the hematological condition
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Individualized Nutrition
|
The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched.
The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation.
EN will be given when oral intake discontinue.
EN with an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
The patients in the control group will be nourished after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route.
Naso-jejunal tube will not be inserted and enteral nutrition will not be given.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Global Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: 3 month after transplantation
|
A score for measurement of global quality of life will be obtained from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, form EORTC QLQ-C30.
The scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores mean better outcome.
|
3 month after transplantation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Underweight Participants
Time Frame: 3 month after transplantation
|
Nutritional status will be assessed with anthropometry, biomarkers and bioimpedance.
Here the number of underweight participants is reported.
|
3 month after transplantation
|
|
Number of Episodes With Fever
Time Frame: Up to 8 months
|
Fever episodes
|
Up to 8 months
|
|
Duration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment.
Time Frame: Up to 1 months
|
Engraftment was judged by the number of days to neutrophils ≥0.2 × 109/l.
|
Up to 1 months
|
|
Frequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-4
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
|
Up to 3 months
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Up to 8 months
|
Up to 8 months
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C30
Time Frame: 3 months after transplantation
|
These scores (range 0-100) will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30 form.
Higher scores means more pain.
|
3 months after transplantation
|
|
Number of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-4
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
|
Oral mucositis will be graded according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Grading Scale, range 0-4 in scores, higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
Up to 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Per O Iversen, MD, Oslo University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- S-09136c
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Effect of Individualized Nutrition on Quality of Life
-
University GhentCompletedOral Health Quality of Life (OHQoL) Was Assessed | the Effect of Surface Roughness on Crestal Bone Remodelling | The Effect of Surface Roughness on Peri-implant HealthBelgium
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedEvaluate the Effect of a Talking Tracheostomy Tube on Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Kyungmi KimUnknownThe Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Quality of RecoveryKorea, Republic of
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedTo Evaluate the Effect of Exercise With Virtual Glasses on Pain, Activities of Daily Living and Quality of LifeTurkey
-
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIACompletedEffect of Two Protocols of Ovarian Stimulation on Oocyte QualitySpain
-
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityCompletedPet Therapy Effect of Sleep and Quality of LifeTurkey
-
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research HospitalCompletedThe Aim of This Research is to Investigate the Effect of Prolotherapy on Quality of Life and Painkiller Use in Patients With Chronic Knee PainTurkey
-
Helwan UniversityCompletedCancer | Chemotherapy Effect | Quality of Life (QOL)Egypt
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiNot yet recruitingEffect of Reflexology on Premenstrual Syndrome Symptoms
-
University Hospital, ToursCompletedQuality of Work Life of Psychiatric Nurses | Impact on Quality of Care
Clinical Trials on Individualized Nutrition
-
Anhui Provincial HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
George Mason UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | PreDiabetesUnited States
-
McGill UniversityMcMaster University; University of Sydney; Institut National du Sport du QuebecRecruiting
-
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityUnknownDiabetes, GestationalChina
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterChildren's Medical Center Dallas; The Gerber FoundationCompletedInfant, Premature, Diseases | Infant, Small for Gestational AgeUnited States
-
University of OsloThe Norwegian Research Fund for General PracticeNot yet recruitingMalnutrition | Aged | PolypharmacyNorway
-
Marmara UniversityZeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training HospitalCompletedGestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionGöteborg University; Chalmers University of TechnologyRecruitingObesity | Overweight | Prediabetic StateSweden
-
Lund UniversityRecruiting
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyAzienda Sanitaria de Sudtirol, Hospital Meran, Meran, ItalyCompleted