Optimizing Individual Nutrition in Preterm Very Low Birth Weight Infants

March 29, 2023 updated by: Luc P. Brion, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Individualizing and Optimizing Nutrition to Prevent Metabolic Syndrome and To Improve Neurodevelopment in Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants

In preterm infants fed human milk, milk needs to be fortified to meet nutrient recommendations. Fortification can be 1) standard, 2) individualized (adjusted based on daily human milk nutrient analysis and milk volume), or 3) optimized (adjusted based on growth rate and serum analyses).

The first specific aim will determine whether individualized and optimized nutrition during hospitalization results in improved growth in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in extremely low gestational age (GA) neonates (ELGANs, <29 weeks) and in small for GA (SGA, birth weight <10th percentile for GA) preterm infants compared with optimized nutrition.

The second specific aim will determine whether individualized and optimized nutrition in the NICU improves neurodevelopmental outcomes (acquisition of development milestones) and reduces the risk of disproportionate growth (i.e., excess fat) in the NICU and findings suggestive of metabolic syndrome in the first 3 years of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypotheses:

  1. Primary hypothesis: In preterm infants (GA <29 weeks or GA <35 weeks and SGA) individualized and optimized nutrition will increase velocity of growth (weight gain velocity by 2 g x kg-1 x day-1 and length velocity by 0.2 cm per week) from birth to 36 weeks of postmenstrual age (GA plus postnatal age) or discharge (whichever comes first) in comparison with optimized nutrition.
  2. Secondary hypotheses: Individualized and optimized nutrition will improve neurodevelopmental outcome and reduce the risk of disproportionate growth (excess fat) in the NICU and findings suggestive of metabolic syndrome in the first 3 years of life.

Study design:

Double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT): After consent, 150 neonates will be randomized to one of two groups.

Study intervention: Patients will be randomized to either:

  1. Control: optimized nutrition: Milk fortification will be based on current recommendations and optimized by adjustment of nutrients once a week based on blood levels of urea nitrogen and albumin and velocity of growth (weight and length).
  2. Intervention: Individualized and optimized nutrition: Milk fortification will be optimized as in control neonates. In addition, nutrition will be individualized every day. Milk fortification will be adjusted based on daily measurements of macronutrients in human milk using near-infrared analysis.

Randomization will be done by computer provided by a statistician using random block allocation and stratification by GA and size for age (AGA [appropriate for GA] 23-28 weeks, SGA 23-28 weeks and SGA 29-34 weeks). Twins and multiples will be randomized to the same arm of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-9063
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 1 week (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm infants <29 weeks GA and SGA infants <35 weeks GA born at Parkland Health and Hospital System
  • Maternal plan to breastfeed or to use milk from the donor milk bank
  • From birth to 1 week of life

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients on comfort care only
  • Patients with major congenital abnormalities
  • Patients who are too unstable for the first 7 days to have an accurate length measurement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Individualized and Optimized Nutrition
Individualized nutrition Optimized nutrition

Intake of macronutrients (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) will be individualized every day by adding one or more macronutrients to human milk based on daily measurements using near-infrared analysis.

In patients receiving less milk than 140 ml x kg-1 x day-1 fortification of human milk will be adjusted to reach at least the average concentrations of protein, fat, and carbohydrate in donor's milk (Wojcik. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jan;109:137-40) and 20 cal/oz as provided by the Mother's Milk Bank of North Texas.

In those receiving at least 140 ml x kg-1 x day-1 of milk at 24 cal/oz fortification will be adjusted to meet recent guidelines from the the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition (ESPGHAN) (Agostoni et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Jan;50:85-91).

Other Names:
  • Targeted, customized
Milk fortification will be based on current recommendations and optimized by adjustment of nutrients once a week based on blood levels of urea nitrogen (corrected for serum creatinine level) and albumin and velocity of growth (weight and length).
Other Names:
  • Adjustable
Other: Optimized Nutrition
Optimized nutrition
Milk fortification will be based on current recommendations and optimized by adjustment of nutrients once a week based on blood levels of urea nitrogen (corrected for serum creatinine level) and albumin and velocity of growth (weight and length).
Other Names:
  • Adjustable

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Growth Velocity
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Rate of weight gain [g x kg-1 x day-1] and length velocity [cm x week-1]
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Linear Growth Velocity
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Increase in body length per week from birth to 36 weeks postmenstrual age or discharge
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disproportionate Growth (Increased Fat Mass): BMI >90th Centile
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Disproportionate growth (increased fat mass): BMI > 90th centile for sex and age
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Systolic blood pressure (calm or sleeping)
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Hypertension
Time Frame: at 1-3 years of age
Systolic blood pressure beyond limit defined by the SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCREENING AND MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE IN CHILDREN
at 1-3 years of age
Neurodevelopment
Time Frame: 18-41 months adjusted age (postnatal age corrected for prematurity)

Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III): cognitive composite score Higher scores mean a better outcome. The composite scaled score has a mean of 100 and a SD of 15, a floor of 55 and a ceiling of 145.

Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development- Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

DOI: 10.1177/0734282906297199

18-41 months adjusted age (postnatal age corrected for prematurity)
Neurodevelopment
Time Frame: 18-41 months adjusted age (postnatal age corrected for prematurity) 18-41 months adjusted age (postnatal age corrected for prematurity) 18-41 months corrected age 18-41 months

Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III): language composite score Higher scores mean a better outcome. The composite scaled score has a mean of 100 and a SD of 15, a floor of 47 and a ceiling of 153.

Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development- Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

DOI: 10.1177/0734282906297199

18-41 months adjusted age (postnatal age corrected for prematurity) 18-41 months adjusted age (postnatal age corrected for prematurity) 18-41 months corrected age 18-41 months
Assessment of Biomarkers of Adiposity
Time Frame: at 1-3 years of age
Serum levels of adipokines: leptin, adiponectin and resistin
at 1-3 years of age
Assessment of Renal Glomerular Function
Time Frame: at 1-3 years of age
Assessment of renal glomerular function: Serum level of cystatin C
at 1-3 years of age
Comparison of Weight With Expected Value for Age and Gender
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of weight with expected value for age and gender: Z score for weight
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of Length With Expected Value for Age and Gender
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of length with expected value for age and gender: Z score for length
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of Head Size With Expected Value for Age and Gender
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of head size with expected value for age and gender: Z score for fronto-occipital circumference
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of Rate of Weight Gain With Expected Value for Age and Gender
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of rate of weight gain with expected value for age and gender: change in z score for weight from birth to time frame
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of Rate of Linear Growth With Expected Value for Age and Gender
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of rate of linear growth with expected value for age and gender: Change in z score for length from birth to time frame
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Comparison of Rate of Head Growth With Expected Value for Age and Gender
Time Frame: 36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Change in z score for fronto-occipital circumference from birth to time frame
36 (range 35-37) weeks postmenstrual age or discharge (whichever comes first)
Body Composition
Time Frame: at 1 year of age and 3 years of age
Percent fat mass measured by Dexascan
at 1 year of age and 3 years of age

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Until discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit
Percent of infants who died from birth to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit
Until discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Time Frame: Until discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit
Percentage of infants who developed necrotizing enterocolitis stage II or greater (using the modified Bell stage classification) in the neonatal intensive care unit
Until discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 4, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU 102014-056

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request after completion and publication of all follow-up data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

after completion and publication of all follow-up data

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

on reasonable request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infant, Premature, Diseases

Clinical Trials on Individualized Nutrition

3
Subscribe