Study to Determine the Effects of Different Doses of Methotrexate (MTX) When Taken With Adalimumab in Subjects With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (CONCERTO)

September 11, 2013 updated by: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Arm, Multicenter Study to Determine the Dose Response of Methotrexate (MTX) in Combination Therapy With Adalimumab in Subjects With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CONCERTO)

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of different doses of methotrexate (MTX) when taken with adalimumab in subjects with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

395

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1055AAF
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44924
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1425DTG
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44926
      • Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, S2000PBJ
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44925
      • San Juan, Argentina, J5402DIL
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47302
      • Graz, Austria, 80360
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44928
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44930
      • Vienna, Austria, 1100
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44927
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44934
      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44935
      • Gilly, Belgium, 6060
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44933
      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44932
      • Edmonton, Canada, T5M 0H4
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 43783
      • Winnipeg, Canada, R3A 1M3
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 43782
      • Brno, Czech Republic, 63800
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44937
      • Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, 37021
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48962
      • Ostrava, Czech Republic, 72200
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44939
      • Prague 2, Czech Republic, 128 50
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44936
      • Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic, 686 01
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44938
      • Zlin, Czech Republic, 76001
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 48963
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44941
      • Berlin-Buch, Germany, 13125
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44945
      • Munich, Germany, 80336
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44942
      • Ratingen, Germany, 40882
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44944
      • Zerbst, Germany, 39261
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44943
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85168
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44946
      • Lodz, Poland, 90-242
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44982
      • Torun, Poland, 87-100
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46584
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-118
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44984
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-256
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44983
      • Caguas, Puerto Rico, 00725
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38975
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00906-6312
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40122
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00936-5067
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39693
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00936-8344
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38916
      • Vega Baja, Puerto Rico, 00693
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39692
      • A Coruna, Spain, 15006
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44947
      • Elche (Alicante), Spain, 03203
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44987
      • Oviedo (Asturias), Spain, 33006
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44948
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 47782
    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38973
    • Arizona
      • Mesa, Arizona, United States, 85202
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41962
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85031
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39260
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 45323
    • California
      • Hemet, California, United States, 92543
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38912
      • Victorville, California, United States, 92395
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39673
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38909
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33169
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40422
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34239
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38910
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30312
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44284
      • Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38907
      • Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States, 30045
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38972
    • Illinois
      • Rock Island, Illinois, United States, 61201
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39670
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62704
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 42282
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67203
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38911
    • Louisiana
      • Covington, Louisiana, United States, 70433
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39672
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 42204
    • New Jersey
      • Clifton, New Jersey, United States, 07012
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40651
      • Freehold, New Jersey, United States, 07728
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41422
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41424
    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40463
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43213
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 42202
    • Oklahoma
      • Norman, Oklahoma, United States, 73069
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44282
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 41423
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29406
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38971
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39666
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39643
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 45325
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77074
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52042
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40602

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female subjects at least 18 years of age
  • Subject has a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) as defined by either the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria or the new ACR/ European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) diagnostic criteria for RA 2010 and has a disease duration of less than 1 year from diagnosis by a licensed health care provider
  • Subject must meet the following criteria:

    1. Disease Activity Score of C-reactive Protein (DAS28[CRP]) ≥ 3.2 (at the Baseline visit only)
    2. At least 6 swollen joints out of 66 assessed (at the Screening and Baseline visits)
    3. At least 8 tender joints out of 68 assessed (at the Screening and Baseline visits)
    4. C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 1.5 mg/dL (at the Screening visit only), or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥ 28 mm/1h (at the Screening and Baseline visits)
    5. Fulfill at least one of the following three criteria: Rheumatoid Factor (RF) positive, have at least 1 bony erosion, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody positive
  • Subject is judged to be in good health as determined by the Principal Investigator based upon the results of medical history, laboratory profile, physical examination, chest x-ray (CXR), and a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed during Screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has previous exposure to any systemic biologic therapy including adalimumab
  • Subject has been previously treated with greater than 1 disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or with methotrexate (MTX)
  • Subject has undergone joint surgery within the preceding two months (at joints to be assessed within the study)
  • Subject has chronic arthritis diagnosed before age 17 years
  • History of invasive infection (e.g., listeriosis and histoplasmosis), chronic or active Hepatitis C infection, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, immunodeficiency syndrome, chronic recurring infections or active tuberculosis (TB)
  • Hepatitis B virus: hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag) positive (+) or detected sensitivity on the hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) qualitative test
  • Infection(s) requiring treatment with intravenous (IV) anti-infectives within 30 days prior to the Baseline Visit or oral anti-infectives within 14 days prior to the Baseline visit
  • Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ADA + 2.5 mg MTX
2.5 mg methotrexate (MTX) oral capsule weekly with 40 mg adalimumab (ADA) subcutaneous (SC) injection every other week (EOW) for 26 weeks
Pre-filled syringe every other week
Other Names:
  • Humira
weekly oral capsule dosing
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ADA + 5 mg MTX
5 mg MTX oral capsule weekly with 40 mg ADA SC injection EOW for 26 weeks
Pre-filled syringe every other week
Other Names:
  • Humira
weekly oral capsule dosing
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ADA + 10 mg MTX
10 mg MTX oral capsule weekly with 40 mg ADA SC injection EOW for 26 weeks
Pre-filled syringe every other week
Other Names:
  • Humira
weekly oral capsule dosing
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ADA + 20 mg MTX
MTX oral capsule dose escalation from 10 mg to 20 mg in 2.5 mg increments every other week (10 mg x 2 weeks, 12.5 mg x 2 weeks, 15 mg x 2 weeks, 17.5 mg x 2 weeks), then 20 mg for 18 weeks with 40 mg ADA SC injection EOW for 26 weeks
Pre-filled syringe every other week
Other Names:
  • Humira
weekly oral capsule dosing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With 28-Joint Disease Activity Score of C-reactive Protein (DAS28[CRP]) Low Disease Activity at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
Percentage of participants achieving low disease activity as defined by a clinical response (DAS28[CRP] < 3.2). The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein, and general health are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score >5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score <3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score <2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With DAS28(CRP) Remission at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
Disease remission was defined as a disease activity score, based on CRP, for 28 joints that was < 2.6 (DAS28[CRP] < 2.6). The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein, and general health are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10.
Week 26
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Criteria Response at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26

Response, as defined by ACR 20 criteria at Week 26. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline are met: ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

  • Physician global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient assessment of pain
  • Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire
  • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Criteria Response at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26

Response, as defined by ACR 50 criteria at Week 26. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline are met: ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

  • Physician global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient assessment of pain
  • Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire
  • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Criteria Response at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26

Response, as defined by ACR 70 criteria at Week 26. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline are met: ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

  • Physician global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient assessment of pain
  • Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire
  • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Criteria Response at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26

Response, as defined by ACR 90 criteria at Week 26. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline are met: ≥ 90% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 90% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 90% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

  • Physician global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient assessment of pain
  • Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire
  • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 100 Criteria Response at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26

Response, as defined by ACR 100 criteria at Week 26. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline are met: ≥ 100% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 100% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 100% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:

  • Physician global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient global assessment of disease activity
  • Patient assessment of pain
  • Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire
  • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ -0.22 at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defined for the HAQ-DI is a change from Baseline of ≥ 0.22. HAQ remission indicating normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from Baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 26
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) is a measure of change in joint health from digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With No Radiographic Progression at Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
"No radiographic progression" was defined as a change from Baseline in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 26 of ≤ 0.5. mTSS is a measure of change in joint health from digitized images of radiographs of hands and feet. Joints were scored for erosions on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 5 (complete collapse) and joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 (no damage) to 4 (ankylosis or complete dislocation). Erosion scores and narrowing scores were added to obtain the mTSS (range = 0 [normal] to 398 [maximal disease]). An increase in mTSS from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
SDAI is a measure of disease activity derived as follows: SDAI = SJC28 + TJC28 + GH (cm) + PhGA (cm) + CRP (mg/dL), where TJC28 and SJC28 represent total tender joint count and total swollen joint count, respectively, based on 28 joints (including the left and right side of the body), GH = Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (both measured on a visual analogue scale with a range of 0 [none] to 10 [severe]), and CRP is C-reactive protein measured in mg/dL. SDAI total score = 0 to 86. SDAI ≤ 3.3 indicates disease remission, > 3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, > 11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and > 26 = high disease activity.
Week 26
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
CDAI is a measure of disease activity derived as follows: CDAI = SJC28 + TJC28 + GH (cm) + PhGA (cm) where TJC28 and SJC28 represent total tender joint count and total swollen joint count, respectively, based on 28 joints (including the left and right side of the body), GH = Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, and PhGA = Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (both measured on a visual analogue scale with a range of 0 [none] to 10 [severe]). CDAI total score = 0 to 76. CDAI ≤ 2.8 indicates disease remission, > 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, > 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and > 22 = high disease activity.
Week 26

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 15, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on adalimumab

Subscribe