STA-9090(Ganetespib) in Metastatic Ocular Melanoma

October 16, 2018 updated by: F. Stephen Hodi, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

A Phase II Study of the HSP Inhibitor STA-9090 in Metastatic Ocular Melanoma

STA-9090, a synthetic small molecule, demonstrates significant activity for down-regulating Heat Shock Protein 90 or Hsp90 levels. Hsp90 belongs to a class of molecular chaperone proteins known to be critical regulators of cancer cell proliferation and survival. Preclinical laboratory experiments have shown STA-9090, an Hsp90 inhibitor, could inhibit ocular melanoma cell lines. The primary objective of this trial is to obtain evaluations of STA-9090 efficacy to metastatic ocular melanoma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with metastatic ocular melanoma have a poor prognosis and very limited standard therapeutic options. The recent discoveries of GNAQ and GNA11 mutations leading to MAPK pathway activation and the over-expression of c-Met generate the hypothesis that inhibition of hsp90 client proteins will provide clinical benefit. This study tests the feasibility and efficacy of hsp90 inhibition in patients with metastatic ocular melanoma. Multiple components of the MAPK pathway (B-Raf, C-Raf, cdk4) in addition to c-Met are client proteins of hsp90 and dependent of active hsp90 for stability. Inhibition of hsp90 should lead to decreased expression of these client proteins.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed stage IV ocular melanoma
  • ECOG Performance status 0, 1, or 2
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Laboratory values as indicated in the protocol
  • Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation
  • Presence of metastatic disease that would be amenable to the required biopsies
  • At least one site of measurable disease as defined by at least 1cm in greatest dimension. This site must be different from the sites to be used for biopsy. No prior radiation therapy or directed ablation to the site of measurable disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to first dose of STA-9090
  • Minor surgery within 7 days of first dose of STA-9090
  • Embolization procedure or ablation procedure to treat tumor within 4 weeks of first dose
  • Participants may not be receiving any other investigational agents
  • Poor venous access for study drug administration unless patient can use silicone based catheters
  • History of brain metastases or of leptomeningeal involvement
  • History of allergic reactions or hypersensitivity reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to STA-9090
  • Baseline QTc > 450 msec or previous history of QT prolongation while taking other medications
  • Ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 55% or less at baseline
  • Treatment with chronic immunosuppressants
  • Melanoma of cutaneous, mucosal or acral-lentiginous origin or of unknown primary
  • Prior treatment with HSP90 inhibitor
  • Not willing to undergo biopsy before and after treatment
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
  • Other medications, or severe acute/chronic medical or psychiatric conditions or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with the study participation or study drug administration, or may interfere with the interpretation of study results, and in the judgment of the investigator would make the participant inappropriate for entry into the study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Individual with a history of a different malignancy are ineligible except for circumstances outlined in the protocol
  • HIV-positive individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy
  • History of or current coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery
  • History of or current uncontrolled dysrhythmias, or requirement for antiarrhythmic medication, or Grade 2 or greater left bundle branch block
  • NYHA class II/III/IV congestive heart failure with a history of dyspnea, orthopnea or edema that requires current treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers or diuretics
  • Current or prior radiation therapy to the left hemithorax

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STA-9090: Cohort A

Cohort A participants received STA-9090 200 mg/m2 given intravenously (IV) over 1 hour once weekly (d1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle).

Participants were treated until evidence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent illness or withdrawal.

Other Names:
  • Ganetespib
Experimental: STA-9090: Cohort B

Cohort B participants received STA-9090 150 mg/m2 given intravenously over 1 hour (IV) twice weekly (d1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 of a 28 day cycle).

Participants were treated until evidence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent illness or withdrawal.

Other Names:
  • Ganetespib

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
4-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate
Time Frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Relevant for this endpoint was status at 4 months.
4-month PFS rate was defined as the proportion of participants alive, absent progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) and on treatment at 4 months. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Relevant for this endpoint was status at 4 months.
Expression of cMET
Time Frame: Estimated up to 24 hours after administration of STA-9090
To estimate the proportion of patients with greater than 50% decrease in expression of HSP90 client protein c-MET 18-24 hours after administration of STA-9090
Estimated up to 24 hours after administration of STA-9090

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Median treatment duration was 1.8 months for each cohort [range: cohort A (0.9-12.5), cohort B (0.8-31.7)]. Thus, response on treatment was evaluated up to 31.7 months.
ORR is defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR status required confirmation no earlier than 4 weeks following first documentation. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Median treatment duration was 1.8 months for each cohort [range: cohort A (0.9-12.5), cohort B (0.8-31.7)]. Thus, response on treatment was evaluated up to 31.7 months.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Median treatment duration was 1.8 months for each cohort [range: cohort A (0.9-12.5), cohort B (0.8-31.7)].Thus, response on treatment was evaluated up to 31.7 months.
DCR is defined as achieving stable disease (SD), partial response (P R) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR status required confirmation no earlier than 4 weeks following first documentation. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum LD of target lesions from smallest sum LD as reference or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable disease (SD) is neither meeting PR or PD. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PR or better response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.
Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 8 weeks on treatment; Median treatment duration was 1.8 months for each cohort [range: cohort A (0.9-12.5), cohort B (0.8-31.7)].Thus, response on treatment was evaluated up to 31.7 months.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Dz was evaluated every 8 weeks on treatment; Imaging was obtained as clinically indicated until off-study; Median (range) on-study duration (months) was cohort A: 8.7 (3.7 to 28.7) and cohort B: 4.5 (1.2 to 36.4 months). Thus, follow-up was up to 36.4m.
PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who did not experience progression were censored at date of last disease evaluation.
Dz was evaluated every 8 weeks on treatment; Imaging was obtained as clinically indicated until off-study; Median (range) on-study duration (months) was cohort A: 8.7 (3.7 to 28.7) and cohort B: 4.5 (1.2 to 36.4 months). Thus, follow-up was up to 36.4m.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Survival follow-up occurred every 4 weeks long-term; Median (range) on-study duration (months) was cohort A: 8.7 (3.7 to 28.7) and cohort B: 4.5 (1.2 to 36.4 months).Thus, follow-up was up to 36.4m.
OS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.
Survival follow-up occurred every 4 weeks long-term; Median (range) on-study duration (months) was cohort A: 8.7 (3.7 to 28.7) and cohort B: 4.5 (1.2 to 36.4 months).Thus, follow-up was up to 36.4m.
Grade 3-4 Treatment-Related Toxicity Rate
Time Frame: AE assessment was ongoing from the start of study drug and up to day 30 post-treatment. Mean treatment duration was 1.8 months for each cohort [range: cohort A (0.9-12.5), cohort B (0.8-31.7)). Thus, AEs on treatment were followed up to 31.7 months.
All grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) with treatment attribution of possibly, probably or definite based on CTCAEv4 as reported on case report forms were counted to calculate the proportion of participants experiencing at least one treatment-related grade 3 or 4 AE of any type on treatment.
AE assessment was ongoing from the start of study drug and up to day 30 post-treatment. Mean treatment duration was 1.8 months for each cohort [range: cohort A (0.9-12.5), cohort B (0.8-31.7)). Thus, AEs on treatment were followed up to 31.7 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: F. Stephen Hodi, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 12, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Melanoma

Clinical Trials on STA-9090

3
Subscribe