Epiduroscopic Laser Discectomy Procedures

October 19, 2017 updated by: Serbülent Gökhan BEYAZ, Sakarya University

Evaluation of The Efficacy of Epiduroscopic Discectomy Procedures: A Retroscopic Study

Epiduroscopy or spinal endoscopy is the imaging of the epidural space using a percutaneous and minimally invasive fiberoptic imaging device. The definitive diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain is increasingly prevalent with epiduroscopy. Recently, as a result of these studies it has been reported that laser therapy with epiduroscopy applied discectomy during multiple lesions. Investigators aimed to retrospectively investigate the efficacy of epiduroscopic discectomy procedures performed at the Algology Clinic.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this study, epiduroscopic discectomy procedures performed between January 2012 and July 2016 at the Algology Clinic of the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, were examined retrospectively. After approval was received from the Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine's Ethics Committee, patient information was obtained from the KarMed (Kardelen Software, Turkey) hospital information system. Files were scanned from the hospital archive. The age, gender, weight, lumbar disc herniation level, preoperative and postoperative surgical history, amount of physiological saline used during the procedure and duration of the procedure, whether a lumbar epidural steroid (LES) was used during the procedure, the amount of epiduroscopic laser use during the procedure, and complications after the procedure were examined. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were recorded preoperatively, as well as after 2 weeks and 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively from the patient files.

The 2007 Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS, Kaysville, Utah, USA) program was used for statistical analysis. The Student t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, ratio, minimum, maximum) in two groups, as well as the normal distribution of quantitative data. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used in the comparison of three groups with no normal distribution. The Pearson Chi-square test was used to evaluate qualitative data, and Spearman's correlation analysis was used to evaluate intervariable relationships. The Friedman and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were used in the evaluation of three or more follow-up parameters without normal distribution. Diagnostic screening tests (sensitivity, specificity) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to determine the cutoff value for age. Significance was evaluated at the level of p < (0.01).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with low back and / or leg pain attached to the Lomber disc hernia were included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with low back and / or leg pain for at least 3 months or more
  2. Patients who do not benefit from conservative treatment
  3. In patients who underwent Lumbar MRI examinations and had axial sheaths with a herniation of 3 mm or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with bleeding diathesis in preoperative laboratory tests
  2. Patients with any local or systemic infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were assessed retrospectively from hospital information system. Files have been scanned from the hospital archive.
Time Frame: One year
VAS is a scale that assesses the intensity of pain during rest or activity of the patient. VAS score of 0 indicates no pain and a value of 10 indicates unbearable pain
One year
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were assessed retrospectively from hospital information system. Files have been scanned from the hospital archive.
Time Frame: One year
ODI is an evaluation questionnaire that questions how much the pain affects the person's daily activities. It consists of 10 subgroups and each section contains 6 questions. Each episode has 0 points for the first option and 5 points for the sixth option. Subgroups are questioning pain severity, self-care, lifting-carrying, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sexual life, travel and social life. As the total score increases, the level of disability also increases.
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disc, Herniated

Clinical Trials on Epiduroscopic Laser Discectomy

Subscribe