Risk Of Severe Hepatic Injury In Patients With Invasive Candidiasis Treated With Echinocandins

March 2, 2016 updated by: Pfizer
The purpose of this study is to estimate the relative risk of severe hepatic injury in hospitalized patients with invasive candidiasis and candidemia who received anidulafungin, compared to patients who received caspofungin and/or micafungin.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

536

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Acute-care inpatients aged 18 years or older, with at least one dose of echinocandin antifungal therapy during the hospitalization and a primary or secondary ICD-9 discharge diagnosis of invasive candidiasis / candidemia identified in the Premier's PerspectiveTM Comparative Database (PCD) from 01 June 2006 to 30 June 2008.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute-care inpatients;
  • Aged 18 years or older;
  • At least one dose of echinocandin therapy during the hospitalization;
  • Primary or secondary ICD-9 discharge diagnosis of invasive candidiasis / candidemia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years of age;
  • No recorded echinocandin therapy during hospitalization;
  • Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity;
  • Pre-existing autoimmune hepatitis;
  • Autoimmune/metabolic liver disease;
  • Primary biliary cirrhosis;
  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis and orthotopic liver transplantation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cases
Potential cases were defined as patients with a diagnosis of severe hepatic injury identified in the acute-care inpatient cohort using ICD-9 codes associated with the case definition of severe liver injury. Case status was validated by a Consultant Gastroenterologist blinded to study drug exposure via medical record review using an apriori algorithm. Only validated cases were included in the analysis (N=69)
This is a non-interventional study, therefore the intervention type / name do not apply
Controls
Controls were defined as patients without a diagnosis of severe hepatic injury (i.e. with no ICD-9 codes associated with the case definition of severe liver injury) selected at random from the same acute-care inpatient cohort as cases (N=467)
This is a non-interventional study, therefore the intervention type / name do not apply

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Any Severe Hepatic Injury Cases and Matched Controls
Time Frame: 01 June 2006 to 30 June 2008 (up to 25 Months)
Severe hepatic injury (acute/subacute necrosis of liver, hepatic coma, hepatorenal syndrome, or hepatitis unspecified) classified as: 1) acute liver failure (associated with encephalopathy and/or coagulopathy in absence of underlying liver disease); 2) Hy's Law Criteria (serum alanine transaminase [ALT] levels greater than [>]3 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] and direct bilirubin >2 times ULN and absence of alkaline phosphatase elevation); 3) ALT levels greater than or equal to (≥) 10 times ULN; 4) ALT levels >3 times ULN and less than (<) 10 times ULN; or 5) classified by clinician. Disease Related Group (DRG) severity of illness coding was reported for severe hepatic injury cases and matched controls.
01 June 2006 to 30 June 2008 (up to 25 Months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Candidemia

Clinical Trials on Does not apply

3
Subscribe