Safety and Efficacy of CollaRx® Bupivacaine Implant in Men After Open Laparotomy Herniorrhaphy

February 18, 2021 updated by: Innocoll

A Phase II, Randomized, Single Dose, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety Profile of the CollaRx® Bupivacaine Implant (200 mg Bupivacaine Hydrochloride) in Men After Open Laparotomy Herniorrhaphy

This study will assess pain intensity for the first 72 hrs after after aggravated movement (cough)following open laparotomy inguinal herniorrhaphy in patient who receive either the CollaRx Bupivacaine implant or a plain collagen sponge.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common surgery; and common surgical methods used include laparoscopic and open placement of synthetic mesh. The use of synthetic mesh can greatly reduce the risk of hernia recurrence regardless of the method used for its placement. Managing postoperative pain and preventing morbidity after open mesh herniorrhaphy remain considerable medical challenges.

Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic (pain medicine) that has an established safety profile. Collagen is a protein that is found in all mammals. The CollaRx Bupivacaine implant is a thin flat sponge made out of collagen that comes from cow tendons and contains bupivacaine. When inserted into a surgical site, the collagen breaks down and bupivacaine is released at the site but very little is absorbed into the blood stream. The high levels of bupivacaine at the surgical site may result in less pain for several days after surgery.

This study will assess pain intensity after surgery in patients who receive either the CollaRx Bupivacaine implant or a plain collagen sponge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Man ≥ 18 years
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 19 and ≤ 40 kg/m2.
  • Has a planned unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy (open laparotomy, tension free technique) to be performed according to standard surgical technique under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a known hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics, opioids, or bovine products.
  • Scheduled for bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.
  • Undergone a prior herniorrhaphy on the side scheduled for repair.
  • Undergone major surgery within 3 mos of the scheduled herniorrhaphy.
  • Has cardiac arrhythmias or atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders.
  • Concomitantly uses antiarrhythmics (eg, amiodarone, lidocaine), propranolol, or strong/moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors or inducers (eg, macrolide antibiotics and grapefruit juice).
  • Used long acting analgesics within 24 hours of surgery. Short acting analgesics such as acetaminophen may be used on the day of surgery but are subject to preoperative restrictions for oral intake.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2, 5x5cm bupivacaine collagen sponges
collagen sponges
Drug: Bupivacaine Collagen Sponge
Other Names:
  • Bupivacaine Implant
Placebo Comparator: 2, Placebo collagen sponges
Placebo collagen sponges
Drug: Placebo Collagen Sponge
Other Names:
  • Collagen Implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sum of Pain Intensity Defined as Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 100-mm VAS PI Scores.
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
The primary efficacy variable was SPI defined as area under the curve (AUC) of 100-mm VAS pain intensity scores after aggravated movement (cough) from 1 to 72 hours after surgery. Minimum score is "0". Maximum score is 7200. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. A lower score means a better outcome or less pain reported.
1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sum of Pain Intensity (SPI) After Aggravated Movement (Cough)
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours * the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is 100* the number of hours in that period.
1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Sum of Pain Intensity (SPI) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) When at Rest
Time Frame: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) at each time point. A lower score is better which means the patient experience lower pain. The score is calculated using the number of hours * the VAS score. This represents the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the pain intensities when calculated with the trapezoidal rule. For each measure outcome - the minimum score is "0" and the maximum score is 100* the number of hours in that period.
1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours.
Pain Intensity Visual Analog Pain Scale Scores Over Time After Aggravated Movement (Cough)
Time Frame: 1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24,48 and 72 hours
Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100). Patients were asked during multiple time points to provide a score on this VAS scale. The lower the sore the better the outcome. Higher score is a worse outcome
1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24,48 and 72 hours
Pain Intensity VAS Scores Over Time at Rest
Time Frame: 1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24,48 and 72 hours
Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100). Patients were asked during multiple time points to provide a score on this VAS scale. Lower score is better. Higher score means more pain. Time points are summarized independently
1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24,48 and 72 hours
Mean Sum of Pain Intensity (SPI) Categorical Scores After Aggravated Movement
Time Frame: 1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24,48 and 72 hours
Measured on a Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) with the lowest possible value of 0 and highest 100 (0 - 100) for each timepoint. (timepoints 1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24,48 and 72 hours ) Patients were asked during multiple time points to provide a score on this VAS scale. For 1 to 24 hours the highest score possible would be 800. For 1 to 48 hours the highest score possible would be 900. For 1 to 72 hours the highest score possible would be 1000. A mean Lower score is better. A mean Higher score is a worse outcome.
1,2,4,6,8,10,12,24,48 and 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine Collagen Sponge

3
Subscribe