A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease

June 27, 2014 updated by: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

A Multi-Center Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease

To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab subcutaneous (sc) for Japanese subjects with intestinal Behçet's disease who are refractory to conventional therapies.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chikushino, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46738
      • Kurume, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46723
      • Nagoya-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46728
      • Nishinomiya-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46725
      • Osaka-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46730
      • Sagamihara-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46722
      • Sakura, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46726
      • Sapporo-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59578
      • Takatsuki-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46724
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46729
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46737
      • Yokohama-shi, Japan
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46733

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intestinal Behçet's disease
  • Patients with typical ulcer at ileocecal region
  • Patients who have failed conventional treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Crohn's disease
  • History of ileocecal resection
  • History of tuberculosis (TB)
  • Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adalimumab
Adalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, subcutaneous injection. After Week 52, participants could continue the treatment with 40 mg eow until the day before approval of adalimumab for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japan.
Other Names:
  • ABT-D2E7, Humira

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
52 weeks
Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Complete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life.
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Study participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented.
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Participants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented.
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Investigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared).
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).
Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health).
Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL.
Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Morio Ozawa, MS, AbbVie GK.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intestinal Behçet's Disease

Clinical Trials on Adalimumab

3
Subscribe