Evaluation of the Spectra Optia® Mononuclear Cell Collection Procedure

April 24, 2013 updated by: Terumo BCT

Evaluation of the Spectra Optia® Apheresis System Mononuclear Cell (MNC) Collection Procedure in Multiple Myeloma Patients

The purpose of this investigation is to establish that hematopoetic stem cells collected on a new centrifugal blood separator, CaridianBCT's Spectra Optia Apheresis System, are able to reconstitute the hematopoetic systems of patients treated with myeloablative therapy, equivalent to hematopoetic cells harvested on the predicate COBE® Spectra platform.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center (3-5) single-arm study that will compare the performance of the Spectra Optia Apheresis System's MNC protocol to that of the historical performance of the COBE Spectra MNC protocol. In order to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of the two devices, a non-inferiority design will be used. The study will enroll patients with multiple myeloma who are to be treated with myeloablative chemotherapy, followed by bone-marrow rescue with an autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplant. Peripheral blood stem cells will be collected using the Spectra Optia MNC protocol and re-infused following myeloablative chemotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologic confirmation of Multiple Myeloma
  • Patients intended to be treated with myeloablative therapy and autologous hematopoetic stem-cell transplant within one month of stem-cell collection
  • Patients whose stem-cell mobilization regimen includes G-CSF (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor)
  • Males or non-pregnant females, who are 18 years of age or older
  • Karnofsky score of ≥70%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pre-mobilization platelet count < 75,000/µL
  • Patients who have received pelvic bone marrow irradiation as part of their conditioning therapy
  • Patients who have had a previous hematopoetic stem-cell transplant
  • Patients who have had a previous hematopoetic stem-cell collection failure
  • Impaired cardiac function, as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction <40%.
  • Impaired hepatic function, as evidenced by alanine transaminase >2.5 x normal
  • Impaired pulmonary function as evidenced by diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (adjusted for patient hematocrit, if indicated) or forced expiratory volume in 1 second <50% of predicted
  • Impaired renal function, as evidenced by a creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min
  • Impaired coagulation, as evidenced by a prothrombin time (PT) > twice normal
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Seropositivity for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1/2, Hepatitis B Virus, or Hepatitis C Virus
  • Documented bacterial or fungal infection that requires intravenous antibiotics to be started or continued while undergoing apheresis collection on the Spectra Optia device
  • Subjects enrolled in study protocols that could affect number of CD34+ cells (pluripoten hematopoetic stem stells) collected or kinetics of neutrophil recovery
  • Altered mental status, as evidenced by the inability to provide effective informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with multiple myeloma
Multiple myeloma patients who receive autologous stem-cell transplants, collected using the Spectra Optia Apheresis System, following myeloablative therapy. The study is limited to subjects who are expected demonstrate normal neutrophil recovery.
In this study, the safety and effectiveness of the new device will be assessed in two ways. First, MNC collections in growth-factor mobilized cancer patients will be evaluated to confirm that the Spectra Optia is able to collect stem cells. Second, following stem-cell collection and transplant, the number of days required for the collected hematopoetic stem cells to engraft/recover will be compared with historical COBE Spectra engraftment/recovery data.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days Until Neutrophil Recovery Following Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant Minus the Historical Median Day Until Recovery.
Time Frame: up to 28 days following transplant

Neutrophil recovery is defined as the day on which the peripheral blood absolute neutrophil count exceeds 500/μL (ANC500)for the first of three consecutive measurements obtained on different days following transplant of peripheral blood stem cells in patients treated with myeloablative therapy for their underlying disease.

As this was a test of non-inferiority, the null hypothesis to be tested (H0) was that the difference between the observed day to neutrophil recovery and the historical median day of neutrophil recovery was greater than two days. At two of the enrolling sites, Duke and Emory Universities, the median day to ANC500 was 12, while at the other two sites, Indiana University and the University of Utah, it was 11 days. Consequently, in the equation below, site specific-historic medians were compared to the observed days to achieve ANC500. H0: D > |2|, where D = Observed median day of neutrophil recovery - Site specific historic median day of neutrophil recovery.

up to 28 days following transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days Until Platelet Recovery
Time Frame: up to 28 days following transplant
The time to platelet recovery is defined as the day following stem-cell transplant (Day 0) on which the platelet count exceeds 20,000/μL, for the first of three consecutive measurements obtained on different days, without platelet transfusion support within the preceding 7 days.
up to 28 days following transplant
CD34+ Cell Collection Efficiency.
Time Frame: up to 7 days

Collection efficiency (CE) is defined as the percentage of any given cellular subset, processed by the system, that is collected from the subject.

CD34+ is a cell surface marker found on pluripotent hematopoeitic stem cells.

up to 7 days
Mononuclear Cel (MNC) Collection Efficiency
Time Frame: up to 7 days

Collection efficiency (CE) is defined as the percentage of any given cellular subset, processed by the system, that is collected from the subject.

Determination of collection efficiency depends on an estimate of the average concentration of target cells in the patient's blood. Because these cells are continuously being removed during the collection, and are undergoing variable replacement from the bone marrow, this estimate will not be completely accurate. Underestimation of the concentration of target cells processed can lead to collection efficiencies of greater than 100%.

up to 7 days
Platelet Collection Efficiency
Time Frame: up to 7 days
Platelet contamination of the cell product was measured as the platelet collection efficiency, that is, as the percent of platelets processed that were collected.
up to 7 days
Hematocrit of MNC Product
Time Frame: 7 days
The hematocrit of the collected product was used to quantitate Red Blood Cell (RBC) contamination.
7 days
Granulocyte % of MNC Product
Time Frame: 7 days
Granulocyte contamination of the MNC product was quantitated as the percent of total product White Blood Cells (WBC) that were segmented granulocytes or bands.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jerry R Bill, MD, Terumo BCT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Spectra Optia Apheresis System

3
Subscribe