A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mental Health Peer-Led Education (BRIDGES)

Efficacy of Peer-Led Education in Improving Mental Health Recovery Outcomes in Tennessee

This randomized controlled trial tests the efficacy of a mental health peer-led educational intervention called BRIDGES (Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support). The BRIDGES program is a 10-week, manualized education course designed to provide basic information about the etiology and treatment of mental illness, self-help skills, and recovery principles in order to empower participants to return to valued social roles within their communities. BRIDGES is a peer-led program and all instructors are adults with mental illnesses. For study purposes, the 10-week course was modified to 8-weeks, meeting 2 1/2 hours once a week.

Hypothesis #1: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report increased feelings of psychological empowerment.

Hypothesis #2: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report increased feelings of hopefulness.

Hypothesis #3: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report enhanced coping ability.

Hypothesis #4: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report enhanced recovery.

Hypothesis #5: Compared to wait-list controls, intervention participants will report greater ability to advocate for themselves with health care providers.

Hypothesis #6: Compared to wait-list controls, those in the BRIDGES education course will report increased knowledge of the causes and treatment of mental illness and recovery principles.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Mental Disorders
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: BRIDGES Peer-Led Education

Detailed Description

Eligibility criteria included having a diagnosis of serious mental illness and experiencing severe functional impairment in one or more life roles. All study participants completed telephone interviews at three points in time: study entry (pre-intervention); 8-weeks later (immediate post-intervention); and 6-months after intervention (approximately 8 months after study entry). Blinded interviewers administered valid and reliable outcome assessments that measured changes in subjects' knowledge about mental illness; emotional well-being; empowerment; hopefulness; self-advocacy; and recovery. All study participants were compensated for their time at each interview. All BRIDGES instructors were people in recovery from serious mental illnesses who were certified and experienced BRIDGES teachers. Fidelity to the BRIDGES curriculum was assessed on an ongoing basis throughout the study.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 428
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Tennessee
    • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37217
      • National Alliance on Mental Illness Tennessee

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Clinical diagnosis of mental illness
• Disability due to mental illness
• Age 18 years or older
• Willingness to receive the intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to understand spoken English

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BRIDGES Intervention; The BRIDGES program is a 10-week, manualized education course designed to provide basic education about the etiology and treatment of mental illness, self-help skills, and recovery principles in order to empower participants to return to valued social roles within their communities. BRIDGES is a peer-led program and all instructors are adults with mental illnesses. For this intervention study, the BRIDGES curriculum was modified from a 10-week course to an 8-week course, meeting for 2 1/2 hours once a week.	Behavioral: BRIDGES Peer-Led Education; The BRIDGES program is a 10-week, manualized education course designed to provide basic education about the etiology and treatment of mental illness, self-help skills, and recovery principles in order to empower participants to return to valued social roles within their communities. BRIDGES is a peer-led program and all instructors are adults with mental illnesses. For this intervention study, the BRIDGES curriculum was modified from a week course to an 8-week course, meeting for 2 1/2 hours once a week.; Other Names: Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support
No Intervention: Comparison Wait-list Group; Participants assigned to the comparison group were in a delayed treatment condition in which they continued in public services as usual, but were offered the chance to attend the BRIDGES program after their final research interview.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Recovery From Mental Illness	Recovery from mental illness is measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) (Giffort et al., 1995). Recovery is a psychosocial outcome assessed via patient self-ratings on a 41-item scale using a 5-point Likert-response format ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The minimum value for the RAS is 41 and the maximum is 205, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Dimensions of recovery include personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others, and no being dominated by one's residual psychiatric symptoms.	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)
Personal Empowerment	Personal psychological empowerment is measured via the Boston University Empowerment Scale (Rogers et al.,1997). This 28-item instrument designed to measure subjective feelings of empowerment via self-report in which respondents answer questions on a four-point scale ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The minimum score is 28 and the maximum is 112, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Hopefulness	Hopefulness is measured by the State Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1991). Hopefulness as a cross-situational long-term trait is assessed via patient self-report using a 12-item scale assessed on a 4-point Likert response scale with options ranging from "definitely false" to "definitely true" and summed to produce a total score and sub-scale scores. The minimum value for this scale is 12 and the maximum value is 48. Higher scores indicate a better income.	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)
Patient Self-advocacy	The ability to advocate for oneself with medical care providers is assessed via self-report using The Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (Brashers et al., 1999), an 18-item scale with a 5-point Likert response set ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Dimensions include in patient knowledge, assertiveness, and potential for mindful non-adherence to treatment. Scoring involves computing the mean scale score, so therefore values range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 5, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Reported below are findings for the assertiveness sub-scale.	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)
Coping Style	Coping is measured via patient self-report using The Brief COPE Inventory (Carver, 1997), a 28-item instrument with 4-point Likert responses ranging from 1-"I haven't been doing this at all" to 4-"I have been doing this a lot." This measure includes two subscales that assess participants' adaptive coping skills (e.g., planning and using emotional support to deal with problems) and maladaptive coping skills (e.g., self-blame and denial). Scoring involves computing the means for each subscale, with a minimum value of 1 and a maximum value of 4. Higher adaptive coping scores indicate a greater use of positive coping styles; higher maladaptive coping scores indicate a greater use of negative coping styles (in other words, lower maladative coping scores indicate a better outcome).	Study entry (Pre-intervention/T1), 8-weeks later (Post-Intervention 1/T2), & 6-months after T2 (Post-Intervention 2/T3)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Illinois at Chicago
• Collaborators: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Judith A Cook, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago; Study Director: Susan A Pickett, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Pickett SA, Diehl S, Steigman PJ, Prater JD, Fox A, Cook JA. Early outcomes and lessons learned from a study of the Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support (BRIDGES) program in Tennessee. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010 Autumn;34(2):96-103. doi: 10.2975/34.2.2010.96.103.
• Pickett SA, Diehl SM, Steigman PJ, Prater JD, Fox A, Shipley P, Grey DD, Cook JA. Consumer empowerment and self-advocacy outcomes in a randomized study of peer-led education. Community Ment Health J. 2012 Aug;48(4):420-30. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9507-0. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
• Cook JA, Steigman P, Pickett S, Diehl S, Fox A, Shipley P, MacFarlane R, Grey DD, Burke-Miller JK. Randomized controlled trial of peer-led recovery education using Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support (BRIDGES). Schizophr Res. 2012 Apr;136(1-3):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
• Steigman PJ, Pickett SA, Diehl SM, Fox A, Grey DD, Shipley P, Cook JA. Psychiatric symptoms moderate the effects of mental illness self-management in a randomized controlled trial. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Mar;202(3):193-9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000098.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: January 1, 2006
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 1, 2010
• Study Completion (Actual): February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 16, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 16, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): February 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): January 18, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 7, 2020
• Last Verified: January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Serious mental illness; Psychiatric disability; Mental health peer-led; Mental illness education; Illness self-management
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2006-0024; H133B050003b (Other Grant/Funding Number: Nat'l Inst on Disability & Rehab Research, US Dept of Educ)