Comparison of Standard and Minidose Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section Operation Using Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy

February 23, 2011 updated by: Bnai Zion Medical Center

Phase IV, Randomized, Parallel Designed, Single Blinded Study, Comparing the Standard and Minidose Spinal Anesthesia Using Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy With Addition of Fentanyl During Cesarean Section

The objectives of this study is to test a combination of low dose local anesthetic Bupivacaine diluted in patient's CSF with lipophilic opiate Fentanyl for optimal spinal anesthesia during Cesarean Section. The dilution of Bupivacaine with CSF in our study would result in effective spinal anesthesia with relatively limited motor block, quick recovery of motor function and relatively long lasting analgesia. We expect lower incidence of side effects with this combination than with convenient dose of Bupivacaine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Spinal anesthesia is the most frequent type of anesthesia used for Cesarian Section. However, despite decades of safe utilization there is still controversy about the best combination of local anesthetics and additives needed to obtain the optimal result. The objectives of this study is to test a combination of low dose local anesthetic Bupivacaine diluted in patient's CSF with lipophilic opiate Fentanyl for compliance with the criteria of optimal spinal anesthesia. Bupivacaine is the most frequently used local anesthetic in the last twenty years . It characterized by fast onset, high potency and long action . Albeit this is intrinsic characteristic of specific local anesthetic, its manifestation can be affected by concentration. It has been shown that dilution of local anesthetic with CSF can result in sensory block with less profound motor block.

Thus dilution of Bupivacaine with CSF in our study would serve double function: it would speed the recovery from the spinal anesthesia and minimize the expression of the motor block.Addition of opiates to local anesthetics has been widely used . It has been shown that this addition improves quality of spinal anesthesia and prolongs analgesia without significant prolongation of recovery from motor block.

In summary, we would use well known safe local anesthetic Bupivacaine in low dose and low concentration (after dilution with patient's CSF) in conjunction with highly lipophilic opiate Fentanyl. We suppose it will result in effective spinal anesthesia with relatively limited motor block, quick recovery of motor function and relatively long lasting analgesia. We expect lower incidence of side effect with this combination than with convenient dose of Bupivacaine.

Good pain relief and swift restoration of ability to ambulate will be important for prevention of postoperative complications, will diminish the need for systemic analgetic drugs that can affect nursing and will increase patients' satisfaction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women over 38 weeks of pregnancy, who read and write Hebrew
  • ASA class I and II
  • Age between 18 and 40 years
  • Weight 50-100 kg
  • Elective Cesarean Section for singlet pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of two or more Cesarean Sections
  • Contraindications for regional anesthesia
  • Active pain before surgery
  • Non singlet pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard dose Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy
Standard group - will receive spinal anesthesia induced by Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 12.5 mg (2.5 ml).
Spinal anesthesia with Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 12.5 mg (2.5 ml)
Other Names:
  • Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy
Experimental: Minidose of Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy
Minidose group - will receive spinal anesthesia induced by Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 7.5 mg (1.5 ml) diluted in 0.75ml of patient's CSF (0.25 ml)with addition of Fentanyl 12.5 mcg (total 2.5 ml)
Spinal anesthesia with Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy 7.5 mg (1.5 ml) diluted in 0.75ml of patient's CSF (0.25 ml)with addition of Fentanyl 12.5 mcg (total 2.5 ml)
Other Names:
  • Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy
  • Fentanyl-Janssen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
prominence of motor blockade
Time Frame: up to 2 h
At the begining of the surgery and at the entry of the patients to PACU motor block will be evaluated
up to 2 h

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operative condition
Time Frame: up to 1 h
Upon completion of surgery attending surgeon will be asked to rate the operative condition.
up to 1 h
intraoperative hypotension
Time Frame: up to 1 h
Number of treatments for hypotensions during the surgery will be monitored.
up to 1 h
need for postoperative pain medication
Time Frame: up to 2 h
The pain or discomfort intensity during the surgery, and at PACU will be graded.
up to 2 h
general patient satisfaction
Time Frame: after 24 h
On the next day, all patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction following the anesthesia.
after 24 h

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Boris Yanovsky, MD, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2011

Last Verified

January 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe