- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03859635
Erector Spinae Block Versus Surgeon Infiltration in VATS Procedures
Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Exparel Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Simple Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Exparel Surgeon Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia Following Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A total of 120 subjects will be randomized by a computer program into three groups (40 per group): The primary investigator will inform the anesthesiologist who will be doing the block as to what group the patients are randomized to. The research staff completing the patients assessments will be blinded to the randomization.
For the LB group (Ultrasound guided LB Erector Spinae Plane Block), patients should receive a total of 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine plus 20ml Exparel® (15ml at T4 and 15ml at T8) For the SB group (Ultrasound guided SB Erector Spinae Plane Block), patients should receive a total of 30ml 0.5% bupivacaine. (15ml at T4 and 15ml at T8) For the SI group (under video guidance) injected by surgeon using 10ml 0.25% bupivacaine plus 20ml Exparel
All the erector spinae plane blocks will be placed preoperatively after sedation, before intubation and prior to surgery. All procedures will be placed under the supervision of the attending anesthesiologist on the acute pain service or the attending anesthesiologist in the operating room.
For the ESP block, an ultrasound probe is used to visualize the ES musculature about 3 cm laterally from the spinous process. In a cephalad-to-caudad direction advance the needle and inject the anesthetic in the interfacial plane deep to the ES muscles. Confirm positioning by visualization of needle tip and elevation of ES muscles off the transverse process with anesthetic injection. Injection will be performed at T4 and T8 level.
Surgeon infiltration is performed intraoperatively under direct thoracoscopic guidance. The intercostal space will be visualized and injected with LB. Typically, T4 through T8 are infiltrated with the anesthetic mixture.
All patients will be placed on ERAS protocol, which is our standard of practice.
Opioid usage after the block will be recorded by a member of the research team. Pain scores at rest and on movement (knee flexion) will be measured by the investigator using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Nausea will be measured using a categorical scoring system (none=0; mild=1; moderate=2; severe=3). Sedation scores will also be assessed by a member of the study team using a sedation scale (awake and alert=0; quietly awake=1; asleep but easily roused=2; deep sleep=3). All these parameters will be measured at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the surgery.
All patients will receive a phone call 6 months after surgery for assessment for chronic post-surgical pain. Patients will be assessed by a member of the research team over the phone. They will be assessed on their pain score and narcotic usage by using the Brief Pain Inventory. Study participation will conclude after the 6 month follow questionnaire has been completed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pt undergoing VATS including but not limited to wedge or lobectomy at Indiana University Hospital
- ASA 1,2,3 or 4
- Age 18 or older, male or female
- Desires regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control
Exclusion criteria:
- Any contraindication for Erector Spinae Plane block
- History of substance abuse in the past 6 months which would include heroin, marijuana or any other illegal street drugs
- Patient staying intubated after surgery
- Patient (home dose) taking more than 30mg PO morphine equivalent per day
- Known allergy or other contraindications to the study medications, which include dilaudid and bupivacaine.
- Pts. scheduled for a pleurodesis, decortication or esophagectomy at Indiana University Hospital
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound guided Liposomal Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Block
All the erector spinae plane blocks will be placed preoperatively using Liposomal Buvicaine.
All procedures will be placed under the supervision of the attending anesthesiologist on the acute pain service or the attending anesthesiologist in the operating room.
|
20 ml
10 ml
|
|
Active Comparator: Ultrasound guided Standard Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Block
All the erector spinae plane blocks will be placed preoperatively using Liposomal Buvicaine.
All procedures will be placed under the supervision of the attending anesthesiologist on the acute pain service or the attending anesthesiologist in the operating room.
|
30 ml
|
|
Active Comparator: Surgeon Infiltration
At the end of the surgery, the surgeon will infiltrate liposomal bupivacaine under thoracoscopic guidance along the intercostal nerves from T4-T8.
|
20 ml
10 ml
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Primary Endpoint of This Study Will be 24 Hours VAS Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 24 hours pain score at rest
|
The VAS score will be taken at rest using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Using a scale of 0-10 for documentation with 10 being the worst pain and 0 being no pain
|
24 hours pain score at rest
|
|
The Primary Endpoint of This Study Will be 24 Hours VAS Pain Score With Movement
Time Frame: 24 hours pain score with movement
|
The VAS score will be taken after movement (knee flexion) using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Using a scale of 0-10 for documentation with 10 being the worst pain and 0 being no pain
|
24 hours pain score with movement
|
|
The Primary Endpoint of This Study Will be 48 Hours VAS Pain Score at Rest
Time Frame: 48 hours pain score at rest
|
The VAS score will be taken at rest using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Using a scale of 0-10 for documentation with 10 being the worst pain and 0 being no pain
|
48 hours pain score at rest
|
|
The Primary Endpoint of This Study Will be 48 Hours VAS Pain Score With Movement
Time Frame: 48 hours pain score with movement
|
The VAS score will be taken after movement (knee flexion) using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Using a scale of 0-10 for documentation with 10 being the worst pain and 0 being no pain
|
48 hours pain score with movement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Endpoint Includes Total Opioid Consumption at 72 Hours
Time Frame: Opioid consumption will be measured at 72 hours post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
Opioid consumption between 48-72hr will be collected by a study team member per protocol time requirements
|
Opioid consumption will be measured at 72 hours post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
|
Average Nausea Scores Over 72 Hours
Time Frame: Nausea scores will be documented at 1 hour post op, 24,48,and 72 hours after the block. The scores will then be averaged
|
Nausea scores will be collected by a study team member post operatively up to 3 days per protocol.
Nausea will be recorded as None=0, Mild=1, Moderate=2, Severe=3.
|
Nausea scores will be documented at 1 hour post op, 24,48,and 72 hours after the block. The scores will then be averaged
|
|
Average Sedation Scores Over 72 Hours
Time Frame: Sedation scores will be documented at 1 hour post op, 24,48,and 72 hours after the block. The scores will then be averaged.]
|
Sedation scores will be documented by a study team member post operatively up to 3 days per protocol requirements.
Determining if patient is Awake/Alert=0, Quietly Awake=1, Asleep but Arousable=2, or Deep Sleep=3
|
Sedation scores will be documented at 1 hour post op, 24,48,and 72 hours after the block. The scores will then be averaged.]
|
|
Subjects Overall Satisfaction Scores at Hour 24
Time Frame: post operatively at hour 24
|
Subjects will be followed up at 24 hours post operatively by a study team member to document patient overall satisfaction scores.
The scores are collected as Very Unsatisfied=0, Unsatisfied=1, Neutral=2, Satisfied=3, Very Satisfied=4
|
post operatively at hour 24
|
|
Subjects Overall Satisfaction Scores at Hour 48
Time Frame: post operatively at hour 48
|
Subjects will be followed up at 48 hours post operatively by a study team member to document patient overall satisfaction scores.
The scores are collected as Very Unsatisfied=0, Unsatisfied=1, Neutral=2, Satisfied=3, Very Satisfied=4
|
post operatively at hour 48
|
|
Secondary Endpoint Includes Total Opioid Consumption at 48 Hours
Time Frame: Opioid consumption will be measured at 48 hours post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
Opioid consumption at 24-48hr post op will be collected by a study team member per protocol time requirements
|
Opioid consumption will be measured at 48 hours post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
|
Secondary Endpoint Includes Total Opioid Consumption at 24 Hours
Time Frame: Opioid consumption will be measured at 24 hours post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
Opioid consumption at 1-24 hr postop will be collected by a study team member per protocol time requirements
|
Opioid consumption will be measured at 24 hours post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
|
Secondary Endpoint Includes Total Opioid Consumption at 1 Hour
Time Frame: Opioid consumption will be measured at 1 hour post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
Opioid consumption at 1hr will be collected by a study team member per protocol time requirements
|
Opioid consumption will be measured at 1 hour post op. The total amount will be recorded.]
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yar Yeap, MD, Indiana University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: A case series. Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
- Taylor R, Massey S, Stuart-Smith K. Postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopy: the role of intercostal blockade. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Jun;18(3):317-21. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.012.
- Tulgar S, Kapakli MS, Senturk O, Selvi O, Serifsoy TE, Ozer Z. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Sep;49:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
- Rao Kadam V, Currie J. Ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracotomy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018 Mar;46(2):243-245. No abstract available.
- Singh S, Chowdhary NK. Erector spinae plane block an effective block for post-operative analgesia in modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):148-150. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_726_17. No abstract available.
- Ma TT, Wang YH, Jiang YF, Peng CB, Yan C, Liu ZG, Xu WX. Liposomal bupivacaine versus traditional bupivacaine for pain control after total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7190. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007190.
- Knudson RA, Dunlavy PW, Franko J, Raman SR, Kraemer SR. Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Colorectal Surgery: A Pragmatic Nonsponsored Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Trial in a Community Hospital. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):862-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000648.
- Knight RB, Walker PW, Keegan KA, Overholser SM, Baumgartner TS, Ebertowski JS 2nd, Aden JK, White MA. A Randomized Controlled Trial for Pain Control in Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery: 0.25% Bupivacaine Versus Long-Acting Liposomal Bupivacaine. J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1019-24. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0769. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
- Bottiger BA, Esper SA, Stafford-Smith M. Pain management strategies for thoracotomy and thoracic pain syndromes. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Mar;18(1):45-56. doi: 10.1177/1089253213514484. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
- Wu ZQ, Min JK, Wang D, Yuan YJ, Li H. Liposome bupivacaine for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jul 22;11(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0420-z.
- Yu ZX, Yang ZZ, Yao LL. Effectiveness of liposome bupivacaine for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010171.
- Raman S, Lin M, Krishnan N. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in colorectal resections. J Drug Assess. 2018 Jun 29;7(1):43-50. doi: 10.1080/21556660.2018.1487445. eCollection 2018.
- Noviasky J, Pierce DP, Whalen K, Guharoy R, Hildreth K. Bupivacaine liposomal versus bupivacaine: comparative review. Hosp Pharm. 2014 Jun;49(6):539-43. doi: 10.1310/hpj4906-539.
- Kaplowitz J, Papadakos PJ. Acute pain management for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: an update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Apr;26(2):312-21. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 25. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1809656804
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | Postoperative Pain After Thoracic SurgeryGreece
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain Management | Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedics
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompleted
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedAcute Postoperative Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainTurkey
-
Children's National Research InstituteVentureWellRecruitingPostoperative Pain | Acute Pain | Acute Pain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of ManitobaUnknown
-
University of MalayaActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain ManagementMalaysia
-
Maimonides Medical CenterCompletedPOSTOPERATIVE PAINUnited States
Clinical Trials on Liposomal Bupivacaine
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicNot yet recruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Atrial FibrillationUnited States
-
Hainan Medical CollegeThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical UniversityCompletedKnee Arthroscopic Surgery | Patients Eligible for Elective Lower Extremity Femoral Nerve SurgeryChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Liposomal BupivacaineChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingPain Management | Local Infiltration | Liposome Bupivacaine | Hemorrhoid SurgeryChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingPain Management | Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Rhomboid Intercostal BlockChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingPain Management | Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Local InjectionChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Local Infiltration | Liposomal BupivacaineChina
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityEnrolling by invitationShoulder Arthroplasty | Shoulder Arthroscopy | Proximal Humerus Surgery | Rotator Cuff SurgeryChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruitingLaparoscopic Surgery | Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | Gynecologic Oncology Patient | Liposomal BupivacaineChina