Efficacy Trial of Eutectic Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream 5% (EMLA) for Analgesia Prior to Cryotherapy of Verrucae Plantaris

April 6, 2011 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Eutectic Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream 5% (EMLA) for Analgesia Prior to Cryotherapy of Verrucae Plantaris in Adults

Aims:

The investigators main purpose is to assess the efficacy of analgesia provide by topical lidocaine/prilocaine cream 5% (EMLA)® to pared plantar warts prior to application of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy in adults.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Methodology:

The study is a single-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with one visit. The investigators planned to include at least 64 patients in 4 months. Adult patients (at least 21 years old) diagnosed with plantar warts are potential subjects for the study.

Once a potential subject is identified, the field investigator will assess him/her for eligibility to enter the study. Then, the potential subject will be provided with full and adequate verbal and written information about the nature, purpose, possible risks and benefits of the study. If the subject agrees to enroll into the study, a signed informed consent will be obtained from him/her.

All patients are randomly assigned by computer-generated randomization sequence to receive either eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA)® 5% or placebo 60 mins prior to application of cryotherapy. The plantar warts are pared with shape blade before applying EMLA®or placebo cream. Based on the randomization, an designated dermatology laboratory technician will apply either the EMLA® cream 5% or placebo cream to the wart lesions. The cream is applied as a thick layer to the wart and to the surrounding 1 to 2 mm and left on for 60 minutes under occlusion of Tegaderm dressing. The cream is then removed, and liquid cryotherapy applied using cryospray. The lesions are treated with double freeze-thaw cycle. The end point of each freeze is a complete ice-ball covering the lesion with 1-2mm peripheral extension. The study involved only one treatment with either placebo or EMLA® cream 5% followed by cryotherapy as described. No other analgesic other than the EMLA® cream 5% or placebo is allowed at least 2 hours prior to or during cryotherapy.

A 100 mm visual analogue pain scale (VAS) is used to denote pain severity ranging from "no pain" (0 mm) to the "worst possible pain" (100 mm). The patient will choose a distance from the "no pain" anchor closest to the pain experienced during cryotherapy for wart removal. Pain is evaluated in each participant using a self-administered VAS immediately after cryotherapy treatment.

Potential Benefits:

The potential benefits are:

  1. The patients may experience less pain during application cryotherapy.
  2. The application of local anesthetic cream may possibly increase the effectiveness of cryotherapy.

Potential Risks:

EMLA cream® is known to be relatively safe with minimal side effects. The commonest side effect would be local irritation to the skin e.g. redness, itchiness which is reversible after removal of the cream. Very rarely (<1000), severe allergic reaction can occur with application of EMLA cream® (AstraZeneca information brochure).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 119074
        • Recruiting
        • University Dermatology Clinic, National University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients (at least 21 years old) with plantar warts
  2. They must agree for liquid nitrogen cryotherapy for treatment of the plantar warts
  3. The patients have to be capable of assessing pain using a visual analogue pain scale (VAS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who had previously used EMLA cream® prior to cryotherapy of warts
  2. Known allergic sensitivity to EMLA cream® or amide type of local anaesthetics.
  3. Patients with sensory peripheral neuropathy of both lower limbs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cryotherapy with EMLA
EMLA applied before cryotherapy
The cream is applied as a thick layer to the wart and to the surrounding 1 to 2 mm and left on for 60 minutes under occlusion of Tegaderm dressing. The cream is then removed, and liquid cryotherapy applied using cryospray.
Other Names:
  • Eutectic lidocaine/prilocaine cream 5%
Placebo Comparator: Cryotherapy with placebo analgesia
Placebo cream applied instead of EMLA
The cream is applied as a thick layer to the wart and to the surrounding 1 to 2 mm and left on for 60 minutes under occlusion of Tegaderm dressing. The cream is then removed, and liquid cryotherapy applied using cryospray.
Other Names:
  • Dummy treatment, dummy cream

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Visual Analogue Score(VAS)
Time Frame: At the end of the treatment (day 1)
At the end of the treatment i.e.Pain VAS will be assessed 60 mins after application of the study cream
At the end of the treatment (day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chen Wee Aw, MBBS, National University Hospital, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Warts

Clinical Trials on EMLA

3
Subscribe