HIP Fracture Accelerated Surgical TreaTment And Care tracK (HIP ATTACK) Trial (HIPATTACK)

November 5, 2012 updated by: P.J. Devereaux, Population Health Research Institute

HIP Fracture Accelerated Surgical TreaTment And Care tracK (HIP ATTACK) Trial - Feasibility Pilot

There is preliminary evidence that suggests early surgical treatment of a hip fracture may improve patients' outcomes. The investigators propose to do a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of a large RCT comparing accelerated surgical repair (i.e. surgery within 6 hours of a hip fracture diagnosis) versus standard care (typically surgery after 36-48 hours).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Hip fractures have devastating consequences: the 30-day mortality rate for men is 9% and for women is 5%, and the risk of disability is substantial. Even among patients who are community-dwelling prior to their hip fracture, 11% are bed-ridden and 16% are in a long-term care facility after one year.

The trauma associated with a hip fracture results in pain, bleeding, and immobility. These factors initiate inflammatory, hypercoaguable, stress, and catabolic states that can cause medical complications, including death. Proposed mechanisms for increased mortality and morbidity associated with delayed surgery include 1) complications related to a protracted immobilization (e.g. venous thromboembolism, atelectasis and pneumonia, urinary tract infections, pressure ulcers, and muscle mass loss) and 2) increased cardiovascular events.

Delay in surgery may result in protracted immobility and the associated complications, as well as prolonged exposure to the hypercoagulable-inflammatory-sympathetic state which may increase cardiovascular events. Observational data suggests that these mechanisms are indeed important: delayed surgical repair is associated with increased mortality and morbidity after a hip fracture.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies addressed the impact of timing of surgery on the outcome after hip fracture. Five studies reported adjusted measures for mortality. The pooled estimate, based on 721 deaths in 4,208 patients, suggested that early surgical treatment (i.e. within the cut-off of the individual studies) of hip fractures was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.96).

It is possible that these observational data substantially underestimates the real potential of early surgery. The reason is that the "early surgery" in these studies occurred within 24, 48 or 72 hours. If surgery could be uniformly undertaken within 6 hours, given the potential benefits of earlier mobilization and minimization of the period of the inflammatory hypercoagulable state, the benefits might be substantially greater. The substantial impact of treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke within hours adds credence to this possibility.

Despite the evidence, and the possibility that a larger effect might result from even earlier surgery, current data supports only weak inferences. The evidence relies on observational data and is therefore susceptible to residual confounding. The strength of inference from current evidence does not lay a sufficient solid base to justify the substantial system modification required to facilitate accelerated surgical access for all hip fracture patients.

The main factors that cause surgical delay after a hip fracture are: 1) the patient presents with comorbidities and surgery is deferred for preoperative diagnostics, risk stratification, and medical optimization ("medical clearance") and 2) surgical operating room and staff resources are not available because hip fractures have low priority in urgent surgery lists ("queuing"). Both medical clearance and queuing are modifiable issues - addressing these obstacles has the potential to substantially reduce surgical wait times.

Our ultimate goal is to undertake a large multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) of accelerated surgical care (i.e., goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis) versus usual timing of surgery among elderly adults diagnosed with a hip fracture. This protocol is for a pilot RCT that will inform the feasibility of undertaking a large RCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2
        • Hamilton Health Sciences
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • St. Joseph Healthcare Hamilton
    • Maharashtra
      • Pune, Maharashtra, India, 411005
        • Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged ≥ 45 years AND
  2. diagnosed during working hours on week days with a hip fracture requiring surgery

Exclusion criteria:

We will exclude patients based on the following criteria:

  1. patients requiring urgent surgery or urgent interventions for another reason (e.g., subdural hematoma, abdominal pathology requiring urgent laparotomy, acute limb ischemia, other fractures or trauma requiring urgent surgery, or necrotising fascitis; PCI; pacemaker-implantation);
  2. open hip fracture;
  3. patients refusing participation;
  4. patients previously enrolled in the study;
  5. Therapeutic anticoagulation not induced by warfarin or intravenous heparin.

Criteria in which the timeline of the surgery in the accelerated care group (after accelerated medical work-up) are at the discretion of the attending physicians.

  1. acute myocardial infarction associated with a mechanical complication (i.e., acute papillary muscle rupture, ventricular septal defect) or ST-elevation MI;
  2. cardiac arrest;
  3. cardiogenic shock, defined by systemic hypotension and symptoms of organ hypoperfusion (oliguria, change in mental status, cold extremities) that the treating physician believes is due to a low cardiac output state (measurement of cardiac index or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is not required) or requiring inotropic drugs;
  4. frank pulmonary edema that cannot be corrected within 2 hours (i.e. after 2 hours the patient cannot maintain oxygen saturation ≥ 90% in supine position with nasal oxygen or 28% oxygen);
  5. respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation;
  6. known pulmonary artery hypertension (> 80 mm Hg);
  7. home oxygen therapy with concomitant non-warfarin full dose anticoagulation or clopidogrel (because regional anesthesia is not possible);
  8. presumptive bacteremia on the basis of fever ≥ 39° Celsius or two of the following: a) Temperature >38° Celsius or <35° Celsius; b) WBC >12 or < 4 or >10% immature bands; c) rigors; and d) hypotension with evidence of organ dysfunction;
  9. hereditary or acquired coagulopathy that cannot be corrected within 2 hours to a INR < 1.5,
  10. thrombocytopenia (platelets < 75) of unknown origin that cannot be corrected within 2 hours or in case of known chronic thrombocytopenia platelets < 50;
  11. deep venous thrombosis in the last month requiring implantation of vena-cava filter;
  12. acute stroke within 7 days of fracture;
  13. subarachnoid hemorrhage within 1 month of fracture;
  14. impaired consciousness of unknown origin (Glasgow coma scale < 12);
  15. fractures acquired during a seizure in patients without a known history of epilepsy;
  16. hyponatremia (< 120 mmol/L) or hypernatremia (> 155 mmol/L) or hyponatremia < 125 mmol/L or hypernatremia >150 mmol/L associated with severe neurological symptoms (impaired consciousness to coma, seizures);
  17. hyperkalemia > 5.5 mmol/L with QRS-complex > 120 milliseconds (in patients without known previous QRS-complex > 120 ms) or hypokalemia < 2.8 mmol/L not amenable to correction within 2 hours;
  18. known pH < 7.15 not amenable to correction within 2 hours; or
  19. indication for acute dialysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Accelerated hip fracture surgery
Arrival in the operating room within 6 hours of diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring surgical repair
Accelerated hip fracture surgery defined as arrival in the operation room within 6 hours of diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring surgery
No Intervention: Standard care
Surgical hip fracture repair according to the standard timing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: 18 months

Feasibility defined as:

  • ability to recruit 60 patients in 18 months
  • ability to achieve arrival in the operating room within 6 hours of diagnosis in >=80% of the patients randomized to accelerated surgery
  • ability to achieve accelerated surgery in a timely manner
  • ability to achieve medical clearance in a timely manner
  • resource requirements to achieve recruitment and follow up
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Length of intensive care unit stay
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Length of stay in rehabilitation facility
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
New admission to a long-term care facility
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Functional Independence Measure (motor domain)
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Short form health survey (SF-36) (acute form)
Time Frame: 30 days
Acute form = 1 week recall
30 days
Delirium
Time Frame: 7 days after randomization
Delirium, as defined by the Confusion Assessment Method
7 days after randomization
Pre-operative Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Nonfatal Stroke
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Nonfatal Pneumonia
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Nonfatal Pulmonary Embolism
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Sepsis
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
New Congestive Heart Failure
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Nonfatal Cardiac Arrest
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days
Nonfatal myocardial injury after non cardiac surgery (MINS)
Time Frame: 30 Days

Myocardial cell injury caused by ischemia, which occurs within 30 days after noncardiac surgery and has short-term prognostic relevance.

The diagnostic criteria for MINS is within the first 30-days after noncardiac surgery a troponin T value ≥0.03 ng/mL that is felt do to ischemia. MINS does not include perioperative myocardial injury that is due to pulmonary embolism, sepsis, cardioversion, a known troponin antibody or known chronically elevated troponin measurements, or another known nonischemic etiology.

30 Days
Composite Endpoint
Time Frame: 30 Days
Composite Outcome of of all-cause mortality, nonfatal pre-operative myocardial infarction, nonfatal myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS), nonfatal pulmonary embolism, nonfatal pneumonia, nonfatal life-threatening or major bleeding, and nonfatal stroke at 30 days.
30 Days
Major or Life-threatening Bleeding
Time Frame: 30 Days
30 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philip J Devereaux, MD, PhD, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University
  • Principal Investigator: Mohit Bhandari, MD, MSc, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HIPATTACK -6.0, 2012-09-24

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Accelerated surgical hip fracture repair

Subscribe