Assessing Volar Locking Plates in Patients Under 65 With a Distal Radius Fracture (DRF)

April 11, 2011 updated by: Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, Canada

Are Volar Locking Plates a Cost Effective Strategy for the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients <65 Years of Age?

Patients will be randomized to volar plating with early ROM versus closed reduction with K-wires and 6 weeks of cast immobilization to determine if there is any advantage to volar plating in this subgroup of patients with distal radius fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

This study has been designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial examining the cost effectiveness of treating distal radius fractures with open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate (VLP) to closed reduction and k-wire fixation (K-Wires). All patients aged < 65 years with an isolated distal radius fracture (extra-articular or simple intra-articular, AO type A or C1) requiring operative fixation will be included in this study. Patients who have underlying osteoporosis, other injuries or complex intra-articular fractures will be excluded from this study.

Once eligibility is determined, patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms. They will be treated with either a closed reduction with percutaneous k-wire fixation and 6 weeks of cast immobilization (K-wire) or open reduction internal fixation with a volar locked plate and early range of motion (beginning at 10-14 days) (VLP). All patients will undergo a standardized pre-operative evaluation. This will include classification of their fracture (based on the AO classification), a baseline PRWE and DASH score, a measure of their general health (SF-12) and a general health utility questionnaire (EQ-5d). Patients will be required to report the details of their occupational physical demands and the number of work days missed due to injury.

Patient testing will be incorporated into scheduled clinic visits. Data will be collected at the initial assessment, 2 weeks post-operatively, and then at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the fracture. At each visit, AP and lateral wrist radiographs will also be obtained. The investigators will then examine the outcomes of each group based on range of motion, grip strength, and standardized patient rated pain and disability scores (PRWE and DASH). In order to capture differences between the 2 groups in the early phases of recovery - the investigators will administer 2 additional assessments at 4 and 9 weeks by either phone or email. These telephone assessments will include an assessment of patient rated pain and disability (DASH, PRWE) and patients will be asked to provide details on whether they have returned to work or their usual activities.

The primary outcome, patient rated pain and disability, will be quantified with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) a tool which has been shown to be valid, reliable and highly responsive in the distal radius fracture population. Secondary outcomes will include range of motion, strength, Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) and time to return to work. The cost analysis will include both direct and indirect costs, and will include: OR time, anesthesia time, surgeon fees, cost of outpatient visits, equipment costs (volar locked plates and k-wires), x-rays, casting, splints, number of work days missed and work disability costs. The investigators will also use the health utility score (EQ-5d) to determine the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) associated with each intervention.

Based on our sample size calculations, the investigators will need 28 patients in each treatment arm (power 80%, p = 0.05). Allowing for a 10-15% drop-out rate, 64 patients are required for enrollment. The secondary outcomes will include ROM, grip strength, union rate, mean time to union (weeks) and DASH score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A4L6
        • Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, St Joseph's Health Care
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ruby Grewal, MD, FRCSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Distal radius fracture - AO type A or C1
  • Skeletally mature
  • Age 18-65 years old
  • Isolated injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • AO Type B or C2,3
  • Other injuries involving affected or unaffected arm
  • Skeletally immature

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: closed reduction with percutaneous k-wire fixation and casted
2 surgical methods to treat Distal Radius Fracture
Active Comparator: open reduction internal fixation with a volar locked plate
2 surgical methods to treat Distal Radius Fracture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: Prior to randomization and at 3, 6, and 12 months following randomization
Questionnaire administered to assess subjective levels of pain and function
Prior to randomization and at 3, 6, and 12 months following randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective measures
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery
ROM, Strength and Dexterity will be assessed
3, 6, and 12 months following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ruby Grewal, MD, FRCSC, Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, St. Joseph's Health Care

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 12, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HULC drf-Volar Plate
  • 17545 (Canadian Orthopedic Foundation Department of Surgery Internal Research Fund)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fracture

Clinical Trials on Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture

3
Subscribe