Effect of Vitamin D Replacement in Patients With Urolithiasis

Effect of Vitamin D Replacement in Vitamin D Deficient Patients With History of Urolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

When Vitamin D replacement is initiated in patients with history of urolithiasis, there will be higher incidence of hypercalciuria but with careful follow-up of these patients, hypercalciuria could be appropriately managed with thiazide diuretics so that the risk of newly diagnosed renal stones will be equivalent to control groups without Vitamin D replacements.the purpose of the study is to determine the effect of vitamin D replacement in patients with previous history of urolithiasis presenting to a tertiary stone clinic in terms of changes in 24-hour urine collection parameters and to evaluate the lithogenic effect of vitamin D replacement in terms of development of urolithiasis. Eighty-six eligible patients will be included in terms of having suboptimal vitamin D with history of calcareous urolithiasis and urinary calcium excretion <7.5 mmol/day. Patients will be randomly divided into 2 equal groups depending on whether they will receive vitamin D replacement with follow-up at 3, 6, 12, & 24 months.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

During the last year, clinical studies on vitamin D have confirmed the presence of world-wide incidence of vitamin D deficiency. Recently, the investigators detected an incidence of 80% vitamin D deficiency/ insufficiency in patients presenting to our tertiary stone clinic. However, there is no data in the literature regarding the safety of vitamin D replacement in this highly specialized group of patients. Consequently, clinicians are concerned about vitamin D replacement in these patients for fear of increased risk of hypercalciuria and stone formation.

This study aims to determine the effect of vitamin D replacement on patients presenting to a tertiary stone clinic in terms of changes in 24-hour urine collection parameters and secondary stone formation. Eighty- six eligible patients with 25-(OH)D deficiency or insufficiency (defined as serum level <72 nmol/L) with history of calcareous urolithiasis and urinary calcium excretion <7.5 mmol/day will be included in the study.

Eligible patients will be randomly divided into 2 equal groups depending on whether they will receive vitamin D replacement or not. Randomization will be done using a computer-based random number generator. Patients will receive vitamin D3 tablets 10.000 IU twice a week for 8 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of 1.000 IU daily for 21 months. All patients will be subjected to full history taking and clinical examinations, urinalysis and culture when indicated, liver function tests, urea and creatinine, ionized normalized calcium, phosphate, magnesium, uric acid, potassium, PTH, TSH and both forms of vitamin D [25(OH)D and 1, 25 (OH)2D], low dose CT scan to confirm stone free status and baseline bone density scan, together with metabolic stone workup consisting of stone analysis and two 24-hour urine collections for calculation of volume, osmolality, pH, creatinine, urea, calcium, phosphate, chloride, magnesium, sodium, potassium, oxalate, citrate, uric acid, and quantitative cystine. Similar follow-up measures will be done at 3, 6, 12, 18 & 24 months. At the end of the study, low dose CT scan and bone density scans will be repeated.

Data will be collected and tabulated using the commercially available SPSS software version 17 (SPSSInc, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics will be presented in terms of percentage, frequency, means and standard deviations for parametric variables and median with interquartile ranges for non-parametric. Differences between both groups will be compared with the Fisher's exact test for categorical data and Student's t- test for the continuous variables. In addition, interplay of more than 2 variables will be analysed using multivariate logistic-regression. The effect of season of recruitment on and changes in serum 25(OH)D will be evaluated using multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with two-tailed p-values less than values 0.05 representing statistical significance. Time to hypercalciuria or time to stone formation c will be analysed using a survival analysis technique and comparison of the 2 groups using a log-rank test.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A1
        • Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting to the MUHC stone clinic and had inadequate vitamin D.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 25-OHD deficiency or insufficiency (defined as serum level <75 nmol/L).
  • History of urolithiasis (Calcareous stones).
  • 24-hour urinary calcium excretion <7.5 mmol/day (normocalciuric).
  • Low fracture risk (estimated by FRAX®, which was developed by WHO).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine concentrations of > 150 μmol/L).
  • History of non-calcareous stones e.g. uric acid, cystine, or struvite stones.
  • Hypercalcemia (serum ionized normalized calcium > 1.32 mmol/L)
  • Patients with secondary hypercalciuria e.g. primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, hyperthyroidism, or active malignancy.
  • Evidence of osteoporosis or intermediate/high fracture risk (estimated by FRAX).
  • Patients taking drugs that could potentially affect urinary calcium excretion (vitamin D, calcium supplement, loop diuretics, steroids, or lithium).
  • Evidence of liver dysfunction or other disorders that may cause non-nutritional vitamin D deficiency or abnormal bone development.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
No vitamin D replacement
The control arm will not receive vitamin D replacement, but patients in both study arms will receive care consistent with best care practices for stone disease. All patients will be evaluated by the stone clinic clinical nutritionist and full nutritional evaluation will be performed. All patients will be advised to maintain adequate hydration (>2L/day), no-added salt diet (Na 80-100mmol/day), low protein diet (1 g/kg/day). Patients with hyperoxaluria will be advised to follow low-oxalate diet. All patients will be advised to maintain moderate calcium intake; 800-1200mg/day.
Vitamin D3 tabs
The active arm of randomization will receive vitamin D repletion in the form of oral vitamin D3 tablets 10 000 IU twice/ week for 8 consecutive weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 1 000 IU daily for further 22 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The effect of vitamin D replacement in patients with previous history of urolithiasis presenting to a tertiary stone clinic in terms of changes in 24-hour urine collection parameters
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The lithogenic effect of vitamin D replacement in terms of development of urolithiasis.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sero Andonian, MD, FRCS (C), MUHC, Montreal QC, Canada
  • Study Director: Ahsan Alam, MD, FRCP (C), MUHC, Montreal QC, Canada
  • Study Director: Ramsey Sabbagh, MD, FRCP (C), MUHC, Montreal QC, Canada
  • Study Director: Bernard Unikowsky, MD, FRCP (C), MUHC, Montreal QC, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urolithiasis

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D3

Subscribe