- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01373346
Safety and Efficacy of Long Limb Roux-en Y Reconstruction (LoLiRoRe)
Long Limb Roux-en Y Reconstruction After Gastrectomy As A Potential Cure for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Non-Obese Gastric Cancer Patients - a Pilot Project to Validate a Prospective Randomized Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Type II diabetes in the world is increasing rapidly, and it is known that patients with type II diabetes with morbid obesity that underwent bariatric surgery have resolution of impaired glucose metabolism.
In Asia, most type II diabetes are not morbidly obese and still, it is controversy whether metabolic surgery is effective or not in non-morbid obese patients. As life expectancy is increased, the number of patients with gastric cancer and T2DM is increased as well.
Recently, we studied the outcome of T2DM after gastrectomy and conventional reconstruction in non-obese gastric cancer patients.(Kim JW et al, World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:49) The study was a large-series retrospective study including about 400 patients and the result regarding DM improvement was not satisfactory. Based on our previous results, it is needed to find more effective way to resolve the type II diabetes in gastrectomized patients with gastric cancer.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 146-92
- Gangnam Severance Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pathologically confirmed gastric cancer with potentially curable state
- Non-obese (Body mass index: less than 30 kg/m2)
Have a history of Type 2 DM over 6 months (diagnosed by ADA criteria)
- HBA1c: more than 6.5 %, or Fasting glucose: more than 126 mg/dl (7.0mmol/L) or 2-h plasma glucose: more than 200mg/dl during an OGTT or classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis, a random plasma glucose: more than 200mg/dl
- Anti-GAD antibody (-), Anti-islet antibody (-)
- C-peptide level: above 1ng/ml
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient who receive non-curative operation
- Patient who have less than one year life expectancy
- Pregnant patient
- Acute inflammation status patient
- Chronic renal disease patient (Serum creatin level: more than 1.5mg/dl)
- Chronic liver disease patient (Serum AST or ALT level: more than twice of upper limit of normal range)
- Have a history of receiving medications such as dipeptidyl peptidase IV(DPP- IV) inhibitor or glucagon like peptide-I (GLP-I) analogue
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Long limb Roux-en Y reconstruction
Long limb Roux-en Y reconstruction means that the length of Roux limb and biliopancreatic limb are longer than conventional reconstruction method after gastrectomy.
|
After radical gastrectomy, the gastrointestinal tract was reconstructed by Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy or esophagojejunostomy.
The jejunum was divided at approximately 100-120 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz and the distal limb of the jejunum was then anastomosed along the proximal gastric greater curvature or esophagus.
The jejuno-jejunostomy was performed approximately 100 to 120 cm distal from the gastrojejunal or esophagojejunal anastomosis
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Morbidity
Time Frame: Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
For the evaluation of safety, morbidity were analyzed. For the evaluation of short-term safety, complications higher than the Clavien-Dindo grade II (Dindo et. Ann Surg 240:205 2004) were collected. *Clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications Grade II: Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade III: Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade IV:Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications)‡ requiring IC/ICU-management Grade V:Death of a patient Suffix'd' : If the patient suffers from a complication at the time of discharge ,the suffix "d" (for 'disability') is added to the respective grade of complication. This label indicates the need for a follow-up to fully evaluate the complication. For the evaluation of long-term safety, the patients were evaluated every month after discharge. |
Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
HbA1c
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
For the evaluation of efficacy for the operation, HbA1c(%) was measured serially (preop. 6months after op. until end of study(on average 14.8 months)). HbA1c is formed in a non-enzymatic glycation pathway by hemoglobin's exposure to plasma glucose and measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) The HbA1c was calculated as a ratio to total hemoglobin. |
Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
Hemoglobin
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
For the evaluation of long-term safety, hemoglobin was measured to determine the degree of anemia and malnutrition.
|
Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
Albumin
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
For the evaluation of long-term safety, albumin was measured to determine malnutrition.
|
Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
Operation Related Mortality
Time Frame: Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
Operation related mortality was measured for the evaluation of safety for the operation.
Operation related mortality was defined as any complication resulting in the death of the patient within 1 month or during hospitalization after operation.
|
Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Matsuda Index
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
Matsuda Index(Insulin Sensitivity Index) was measured. The Matsuda index was obtained using the following formula: Matsuda index = 10000/square root of [(fasting glucose × fasting insulin) × (mean glucose × mean insulin during OGTT)] |
Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
QUICKI
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation , Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
The quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) was measured. The QUICKI was obtained using the following formula: 1 / (log(fasting insulin µU/mL) + log(fasting glucose mg/dL)) |
Before operation , 6 months after operation , Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
HOMA-IR
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
HOMA-IR(Homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance) was measured. HOMA-IR was obtained using the following formula: Glucose(mg/dl) x Insulin/405 |
Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
HOMA-B
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
HOMA-B(Homoeostasis model assessment-derived beta-cell function) was measured. HOMA-B was obtained using the following formula: 225 × 18/fasting insulin(mU/L) × fasting glucose(mg/dL) |
Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
Body Mass Index
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 Months After Operation, Until End of Study(on Average 14.8 Months)
|
BMI(Body Mass index , kg/㎡) was measured. BMI was obtained using the following formula: Weight (kg) / (Height (m) x Height (m)) |
Before operation, 6 Months After Operation, Until End of Study(on Average 14.8 Months)
|
|
Matsuda Index : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months). Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications after operation. We called this group as "good response group". We analyzed the change of insulin sensitivity after operation in good response group. The Matsuda index(Insulin Sensitivity Index) was obtained using the following formula: Matsuda index = 10000/square root of [(fasting glucose × fasting insulin) × (mean glucose × mean insulin during OGTT)] |
Before operation , 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
QUICKI : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months). Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications. We called this group as "good response group". We analyzed the change of insulin sensitivity after operation in good response group. The quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) was measured. The QUICKI is obtained using the following formula: 1 / (log(fasting insulin µU/mL) + log(fasting glucose mg/dL)) |
Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
HOMA-IR : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months). Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications. We called this group as "good response group". We analyzed the change of insulin resistance after operation in good response group. HOMA-IR(Homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance) was measured. HOMA-IR was obtained using the following formula: Glucose(mg/dl) x Insulin/405 |
Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
HOMA-B : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months). Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications. We called this group as "good response group". We analyzed the change of beta-cell function after operation in good response group. HOMA-B(Homoeostasis model assessment-derived beta-cell function) was measured. HOMA-B was obtained using the following formula: 225 × 18/fasting insulin(mU/L) × fasting glucose(mg/dL) |
Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
Body Mass Index : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months). Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications. We called this group as "good response group". We analyzed the change of weight change after operation in good response group. BMI(Body Mass index , kg/㎡) was measured. BMI was obtained using the following formula: Weight (kg) / (Height (m) x Height (m)) |
Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
HbA1c : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months). Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications. We called this group as "good response group". We analyzed the change of HbA1c after operation in good response group. HbA1c is formed in a non-enzymatic glycation pathway by hemoglobin's exposure to plasma glucose and measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) The HbA1c was calculated as a ratio to total hemoglobin. |
Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
Hemoglobin : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months).
Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications.
We called this group as "good response group".
For the evaluation of long-term safety, hemoglobin was measured to determine the degree of anemia and malnutrition in good response group.
|
Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
|
Albumin : Good Response Group
Time Frame: Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
At the end of the study, the follow-up duration was 12.5 ± 5.5 months (6.0 - 21.7 months).
Some patients showed normal FPG level and HbA1c < 6% without any antidiabetic medications.
We called this group as "good response group".
We analyzed the change of albumin level after operation in good response group for the evaluation of long-term safety.
|
Before operation, 6 months after operation, Until end of study (on average 14.8 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Seung Ho Choi, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Yoon KH, Lee JH, Kim JW, Cho JH, Choi YH, Ko SH, Zimmet P, Son HY. Epidemic obesity and type 2 diabetes in Asia. Lancet. 2006 Nov 11;368(9548):1681-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69703-1.
- Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, Bantle JP, Sledge I. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009 Mar;122(3):248-256.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.041.
- Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, Long SB, Morris PG, Brown BM, Barakat HA, deRamon RA, Israel G, Dolezal JM, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995 Sep;222(3):339-50; discussion 350-2. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199509000-00011.
- Rubino F, Forgione A, Cummings DE, Vix M, Gnuli D, Mingrone G, Castagneto M, Marescaux J. The mechanism of diabetes control after gastrointestinal bypass surgery reveals a role of the proximal small intestine in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):741-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000224726.61448.1b.
- FRIEDMAN MN, SANCETTA AJ, MAGOVERN GJ. The amelioration of diabetes mellitus following subtotal gastrectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1955 Feb;100(2):201-4. No abstract available.
- ANGERVALL L, DOTEVALL G, TILLANDER H. Amelioration of diabetes mellitus following gastric resection. Acta Med Scand. 1961 Jun;169:743-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1961.tb07885.x. No abstract available.
- Yang J, Li C, Liu H, Gu H, Chen P, Liu B. Effects of subtotal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy on the clinical outcome of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Surg Res. 2010 Nov;164(1):e67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
- Kim JW, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Outcome after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with type 2 diabetes. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan 7;18(1):49-54. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i1.49.
- DeFronzo RA, Matsuda M. Reduced time points to calculate the composite index. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):e93. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0646. No abstract available.
- Emoto M, Nishizawa Y, Maekawa K, Hiura Y, Kanda H, Kawagishi T, Shoji T, Okuno Y, Morii H. Homeostasis model assessment as a clinical index of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients treated with sulfonylureas. Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):818-22. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.818.
- Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, Baron AD, Follmann DA, Sullivan G, Quon MJ. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jul;85(7):2402-10. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.7.6661.
- Frenken M, Cho EY, Karcz WK, Grueneberger J, Kuesters S. Improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus in obese and non-obese patients after the duodenal switch operation. J Obes. 2011;2011:860169. doi: 10.1155/2011/860169. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
- Navarrete SA, Leyba JL, Llopis SN. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in non-obese patients: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2011 May;21(5):663-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0371-8.
- Cohen R, Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Schiavon CA. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for BMI < 35 kg/m(2): a tailored approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 May-Jun;2(3):401-4, discussion 404. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.02.011.
- DePaula AL, Macedo AL, Mota BR, Schraibman V. Laparoscopic ileal interposition associated to a diverted sleeve gastrectomy is an effective operation for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with BMI 21-29. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1313-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0156-x. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
- Cohen RV, Schiavon CA, Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Rubino F. Duodenal-jejunal bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with body mass index of 22-34 kg/m2: a report of 2 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):195-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.01.009. No abstract available.
- Orci L, Chilcott M, Huber O. Short versus long Roux-limb length in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for the treatment of morbid and super obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2011 Jun;21(6):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0409-y.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- seungho-1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer
-
City of Hope Medical CenterCompletedGastric Cancer | Gastric Adenocarcinoma | Gastric Cancer Stage IV | Gastric Neoplasm | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Lung | Gastric Cancer Stage | Gastric Cancer Metastatic to Liver | Gastric Cancer Stage III | Gastric Cancer Stage II | Gastric Lesion | Gastric Cancer in Situ | Gastric Cancer Stage IIIB | Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States, Japan
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Clinical Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage 0 Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterCompletedAdenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Recurrent Gastric Cancer | Diffuse Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Intestinal Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Mixed Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric Cancer and other conditionsUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Clinical Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Clinical Stage IVA Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v8 | Pathologic... and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGastric Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Stage II Gastric Cancer | Stage III Gastric CancerUnited States
-
Ukrainian Society of Clinical OncologyRecruitingGastric Cancer | Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer | Gastric Cancer Stage III | Gastric Cancer Stage IIUkraine
-
Lin LiuRecruitingGastric Carcinoma | Gastric Neoplasm | Gastric Cancer Adenocarcinoma Metastatic | Gastric (cardia, Body) CancerChina
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingGastric Adenocarcinoma | Epstein-Barr Virus Positive | Mismatch Repair Protein Deficiency | Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage III Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma | Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma | Stage IB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage II Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer AJCC v7United States
-
Ukrainian Society of Clinical OncologyRecruitingStomach Cancer | Gastric Cancer | Chemotherapy | Gastric Adenocarcinoma | Gastrectomy | Gastrointestinal Cancer | Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma | Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma | GastroEsophageal Cancer | Stomach Neoplasm | Gastric Neoplasm | Advanced Gastric Carcinoma | Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer | Advanced Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma and other conditionsLithuania, Ukraine
Clinical Trials on Long limb Roux-en Y reconstruction
-
Kyungpook National University Chilgok HospitalCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Stomach NeoplasmKorea, Republic of
-
Korea University Anam HospitalGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Shanghai Jiao... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Gastric CancerKorea, Republic of
-
Korea University Guro HospitalSamsung Medical Center; Asan Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University Hospital, LilleMinistry of Health, FranceRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 in ObeseFrance
-
CARLOS ZERRWECK LOPEZCompletedRoux-en-Y Gastric Bypass | Bariatric Surgery | Metabolic SurgeryMexico
-
Jilin UniversityUnknown
-
Fudan UniversityUnknown
-
Wakayama Medical UniversityUnknownPancreatic Neoplasms | Pancreatitis | Bile Duct Neoplasms | Duodenal Neoplasms | Ampullary NeoplasmsJapan
-
Wakayama Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedObesity, Morbid | Bariatric Surgery Candidate | Vitamin B 12 Deficiency | Folate Deficiency | Homocystine; Metabolic DisorderAustria