Accelerated Titration of Oxytocin for Nulliparous Patients With Labour Dystocia: ACTION Pilot Study (ACTION)

June 23, 2015 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Accelerate Versus Gradual Titration of Oxytocin Dose for Labour Dystocia: A Pilot Study

The ultimate objective is to test the hypothesis that an 'accelerated titration' protocol for labour augmentation with oxytocin reduces the risk of caesarean births relative to a 'gradual titration' protocol.

The aims of this pilot feasibility are:

  1. To assess the feasibility of a large multi-centre randomized control trial comparing the two above oxytocin protocols (accelerated titration versus gradual titration for correction of dystocia).
  2. More specifically, to identify potential challenges in the study implementation, particularly with respect to patient recruitment, randomization, blinding, and compliance/adherence to the labour management guidelines and study protocols.
  3. To obtain preliminary data on the acceptability of the accelerated oxytocin titration protocol among obstetrical providers and participants.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There has been a steady increase in the rate of Caesarean births in Canada and worldwide. Almost half of all primary caesarean sections are performed for labour dystocia - when labour is abnormally slow or when there is no further progression in cervical dilatation. When dystocia occurs, oxytocin is used to increase the frequency and intensity of uterine contractions, with the goal of achieving full cervical dilatation and a vaginal birth. The actual dose required to produce a clinical response (progressive cervical dilatation) varies greatly from patient to patient. There is a wide range of oxytocin regimens currently in use. They may be broadly categorized as being of two types: 1) those involving a gradual titration of oxytocin dose (or 'low dose') and 2) those with accelerated oxytocin titration (also called 'high dose').

In fact, the frequently used terms 'low dose' and 'high dose' are to a certain extent misnomers. Both protocols titrate oxytocin dose to achieve the desired 'physiological frequency' of uterine contractions (usually 4 to 5 contractions in a 10 minute interval) that are normally sufficient to result in progressive labour. Thus, the target dose should, theoretically, be identical and independent of the rate of increase of oxytocin. These protocols differ mainly in the rate at which the desired physiologic response is achieved. While most patients achieve a response to stimulation at oxytocin concentrations between 4 and 10 mU per minute, a proportion of nulliparae require higher doses of oxytocin. Accelerated titration protocols are also frequently associated with a higher maximum concentration of oxytocin. While, most Canadian birthing centres currently follow a 'gradual titration' or 'low dose' protocol, there is evidence that 'accelerated titration' or 'high dose' protocols may be more effective in correcting dystocia and in preventing caesarean section. It is postulated that by more rapidly progressing to the required therapeutic dose, cervical dilatation is achieved more rapidly, the likelihood of a spontaneous vaginal birth is increased, and the risk of occurrence of complications resulting from prolonged labour (such as infection and maternal fatigue) is reduced.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1C5
        • Sainte-Justine Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Capability of participant to comprehend English and/or French and to comply with study requirements
  2. ≥ 18 years of age at time of consent
  3. Nulliparity
  4. Singleton pregnancy
  5. Cephalic Presentation
  6. No contraindications to trial of labour or vaginal birth
  7. Term pregnancy (37+0 to 42+0 weeks gestation)
  8. Spontaneous onset of labour
  9. In the ACTIVE phase of the FIRST stage of labour. Active labour is defined as:

    1. The presence of regular uterine contractions
    2. Cervical dilatation of ≥ 3 cm
    3. Cervical effacement of at least 80% (cervical length < 1cm)
  10. DYSTOCIA in the ACTIVE phase of FIRST stage of labour established by the Physician.

    1. Cervical change of < 0.5 cm/hour over four hours OR
    2. NO cervical change in 2 hours
  11. Ruptured amniotic membranes of at least 30 minutes
  12. Normal fetal heart rate pattern at the time of randomization

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Serious medical condition (severe cardiac, pulmonary, or renal disease)
  2. Known fetal anomaly
  3. Known sensitivity to oxytocin
  4. Contraindications to labour or vaginal birth (uterine scar)
  5. Induced labour (using any method)
  6. Oxytocin use prior to randomization
  7. Second stage of labour
  8. Suspected IUGR (<5th percentile)
  9. Suspected macrosomia at term (>4500 grams)
  10. Oligohydramnios (no 2x2 pocket of fluid on ultrasound prior to rupture of amniotic membranes)
  11. Abnormal FHR pattern at the time of randomization
  12. Suspected chorioamnionitis
  13. Severe pre-eclampsia
  14. Suspected placental abruption

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Accelerated Oxytocin Titration
Accelerated Oxytocin Titration
Other Names:
  • Pitocin, Syntocinon, Uteracon
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Gradual Oxytocin Titration
Accelerated Oxytocin Titration
Other Names:
  • Pitocin, Syntocinon, Uteracon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consent Rate
Time Frame: From screening for eligibility until randomization (up to 5 weeks)
  1. The proportion of patients who are eligible and thus meet inclusion/exclusion criteria at time of labour onset
  2. The proportion of eligible participants who consent to participate and are randomized
From screening for eligibility until randomization (up to 5 weeks)
Protocol Violation Rate
Time Frame: From admission to a hospital for delivery until delivery (up to 1 week)
a) The proportion among those randomized of deviation from study protocol with regards to duration of oxytocin augmentation prior to operative intervention
From admission to a hospital for delivery until delivery (up to 1 week)
Maternal satisfaction
Time Frame: from hospital admission to 4 weeks postpartum
  1. Pain score on visual analog scale during labour and delivery
  2. North Bristol modified Mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale
from hospital admission to 4 weeks postpartum

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caesarean section rate
Time Frame: From admission to a hospital for delivery until delivery (up to 1 week)
From admission to a hospital for delivery until delivery (up to 1 week)
Rate of Maternal and Fetal/Neonatal Adverse Events
Time Frame: From admission to the hospital for delivery until discharge of the baby from the neonatal intensive care unit (up to 4 weeks after birth)
  1. Rate of tachysystole and hyperstimulation
  2. Rate of abnormal FHR pattern
  3. Composite index of adverse fetal outcome (cord arterial pH < 7.1, base deficit ≥ 12 mmol/L, 5 minute Apgar score ≤ 7)
  4. Admission of a term infant to the neonatal intensive care unit
  5. Proportion requiring unblinding of protocol
From admission to the hospital for delivery until discharge of the baby from the neonatal intensive care unit (up to 4 weeks after birth)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jessica Dy, MD, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Shu Qin Wei, MD, PhD, Sainte-Justine Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labour Dystocia

Clinical Trials on Oxytocin

3
Subscribe