Use of the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction

January 3, 2013 updated by: Medtronic Surgical Technologies

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Superiority Study to Evaluate Use of the PEAK PlasmaBlade® 4.0 in Bilateral Breast Reduction

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the operative performance of the PEAK PlasmaBlade® 4.0 during bilateral breast reduction; to monitor and record post-operative pain, adverse events and skin scarring following surgery; and to compare these outcomes to the HARMONIC SYNERGY® BLADE.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Johnstown, Colorado, United States, 80534
        • Gonyon Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery, PC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 and 70
  2. Physically healthy, stable weight
  3. No smoking <1 month prior to surgery and during study.
  4. Desiring bilateral breast reduction
  5. Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure.
  6. Subject must be willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations.
  7. Female subjects must either be incapable of reproduction, or taking acceptable measures to prevent pregnancy and have a negative pregnancy test prior to participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age younger than 18 or greater than 70 years old
  2. Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued
  3. Smoking <1 month prior to surgery or during study
  4. Infection (local or systemic)
  5. Cognitive impairment or mental illness
  6. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
  7. Known coagulopathy
  8. Immunocompromised
  9. Prior history of breast cancer
  10. Kidney disease (any type)
  11. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing
  12. Subjects who are status-post gastric banding or gastric bypass
  13. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
  14. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: PEAK PlasmaBlade
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard of Care
The Standard of Care arm will consist of the scalpel for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for subcutaneous dissection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in pain
Time Frame: 24 hours and first 10 days post-op
The primary endpoint will be the difference in pain between the Harmonic and PlasmaBlade operative sites. The primary efficacy variable will be pain at each treatment arm operative site, as measured by visual analog scale for 24 hours post-operatively and for 10 post-op days twice daily.
24 hours and first 10 days post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative performance
Time Frame: Intraoperatively on day 0
Dissection time (normalized), estimated blood loss, use of traditional device for bleeding control, volume of tissue resection.
Intraoperatively on day 0
Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 month post-operatively
Monitoring for adverse events following surgery, including hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, etc.
1 month post-operatively
Cutaneous scarring
Time Frame: Up to one year post-operatively
Scar width, quality, pigmentation, elevation, nodularity, thickness, and cosmetic appearance will be blindly evaluated by subject and independent observers.
Up to one year post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Denis Gonyon, MD, Gonyon Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery, PC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 28, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 7, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VP-00133

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macromastia (Symptomatic)

Clinical Trials on PEAK PlasmaBlade

Subscribe