PEAK PlasmaBlade™ 4.0 Versus Traditional Electrosurgery in Mastectomy (PRECISE)

January 3, 2013 updated by: Medtronic Surgical Technologies

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Superiority Study to Evaluate Use of the PEAK PlasmaBlade™ 4.0 in Mastectomy

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the incidence of partial skin necrosis following modified-radical mastectomy with or without same-day (two-stage) reconstruction with the PEAK PlasmaBlade 4.0; to monitor and record operative performance, post-operative pain, drain output, and skin scarring following surgery; and to compare these endpoints to the current standard of care (SOC).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mastectomy is a surgical procedure performed to remove breast tissue that contains cancer, or has a high probability of containing cancer. During the procedure, a scalpel is used for the skin incision and a traditional electrosurgical device is used to cut away the breast tissue from the chest and control bleeding. Once the breast tissue is removed the remaining skin edges are brought together with sutures.

Following mastectomy, the most common complication is persistent serous wound drainage and seroma, a collection of fluid in the closed surgical space. To help prevent this complication a tissue drain is used to remove serous fluid from the surgical space via bulb suction. The rate of serous fluid collection is used to determine the time the drain remains in place. Although suction drains help reduce seroma formation, prolonged use may delay healing, cause injury, and increase the risk of infection and patient discomfort.

The PEAK PlasmaBlade™ uses pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy to enable precision cutting and coagulating at the point of application, without the thermal damage to surrounding tissues that is normally seen with traditional electrosurgery. The PlasmaBlade has received FDA clearance for use in plastic, general, and ENT surgery, and has demonstrated significantly reduced serous drainage in tissue reduction surgeries, like mastectomy.

This multi-site study was granted IRB approval and conducted between June 2009 and January 2011. Potential subjects were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol and were then required to provide informed consent prior to enrollment. Following enrollment, subjects were prospectively randomized to the SOC or PlasmaBlade (PB or PEAK) study groups and scheduled for mastectomy with or without same day reconstruction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Burbank, California, United States, 94505
        • Providence St. Joseph's Medical Center
      • Mountain View, California, United States, 94040
        • El Camino Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
        • Advanced Breast Care
    • Maryland
      • Towson, Maryland, United States, 21204
        • St. Joseph Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 20 and 70 years old
  2. Physically healthy, stable weight
  3. Requiring single or bilateral simple mastectomy, with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy
  4. Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure
  5. Subject must be willing and able to comply with all follow-up evaluations

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age younger than 20 or greater than 70 years old
  2. Anticoagulation therapy which cannot be discontinued
  3. Prior external beam or implanted radiotherapy
  4. Tobacco use (any kind)
  5. Infection (local or systemic)
  6. Cognitive impairment or mental illness
  7. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
  8. Known coagulopathy
  9. Immunocompromised
  10. Kidney disease (any type)
  11. Desiring or requiring same-day breast reconstruction
  12. Prior breast reduction or augmentation surgery
  13. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up
  14. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing
  15. Subjects who are status-post gastric banding or gastric bypass
  16. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
  17. Time from most recent neoadjuvant therapy less than 4 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Scalpel will be used for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the subcutaneous dissection.
The PEAK PlasmaBlade will be used for the entirety of the breast reduction, including the skin incision.
Experimental: PEAK PlasmaBlade
The entirety of the mastectomy will be performed with the PEAK PlasmaBlade, including the skin incision.
The entirety of the mastectomy will be performed with the PEAK PlasmaBlade, including the skin incision.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total Serous Drainage (mL) From Time of Drain Placement to Removal.
Time Frame: 0 to 10 days postoperatively
0 to 10 days postoperatively
Area of Skin Necrosis Measured With a Standard Ruler
Time Frame: 1 and 6 weeks postoperative
1 and 6 weeks postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain Score by Visual Analog Scale, Narcotic Consumption, Operative Time, Time to Surgical Drain Removal
Time Frame: 0 to 10 days postoperatively
0 to 10 days postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Teresa Ponn, MD, Elliot Breast Health Center
  • Principal Investigator: Edward Dalton, MD, Elliot Breast Health Center
  • Principal Investigator: Richard Fine, MD, Advanced Breast Care
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Naruns, MD, Midpeninsula Surgical Associates
  • Principal Investigator: Saul Eisenstat, MD, Midpeninsula Surgical Associates
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Schultz, MD, St. Joseph Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mastectomy

Clinical Trials on Scalpel and Traditional Electrosurgery

3
Subscribe