Compare Aquacel® Ag Versus Mepilex® Border Ag to Manage Bioburden in Leg Ulcers

July 29, 2013 updated by: ConvaTec Inc.

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study to Compare Aquacel® Ag vs. Mepilex® Border Ag to Manage Bioburden in Leg Ulcers.

The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of Aquacel® Ag and Mepilex® Border Ag to manage bioburden in leg ulcers over a two week study period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Salford
      • Weaste, Salford, United Kingdom, M5 2JR
        • The Willows Centre for Health Care
    • Wales
      • Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom, CF14 4XN
        • Wound Healing Research Unit, Cardiff University
    • Wirral
      • Upton, Wirral, United Kingdom, CH49 5PE
        • Arrowe Park Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or over
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Leg ulcer will be of size ranging between 10 cm2 - 40 cm2 with moderate or heavy exudate
  • Leg ulcer will exhibit at least 2 of the 4 following clinical signs: pain between 2 dressing changes, peri-ulcer skin erythema, oedema, foul odour

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known skin sensitivity to any component of the products being tested
  • Subjects who have had current local or systemic antibiotics and/or topical antimicrobials applied in the week prior to inclusion
  • Depth of ulcer classified as superficial (not involving dermis) or deep (exposing muscle and tendon)
  • Any other medical condition which, according to the investigator, justifies the subject's exclusion from the study
  • Participated in a clinical study within the past 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aquacel® Ag
Dressing will be changed during the clinic visit on day 3, 7 and 14. In between the clinic visits the dressing should be changed when needed depending on the clinical condition of the wound and the volume of exudate.
Active Comparator: Mepilex® Border Ag
Dressing will be changed during the clinic visit on day 3, 7 and 14. In between the clinic visits the dressing should be changed when needed depending on the clinical condition of the wound and the volume of exudate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbial load reduction
Time Frame: Days 1 and 14
The relative reduction from baseline in microbial load (bio-burden) over a 2 week study period as measured by quantitative and qualitative microbiology methods.
Days 1 and 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical evolution of the wound (presence of each of the selected clinical signs)
Time Frame: Days 1, 3, 7, 14
Study's clinical signs: level of exudate (moderate or heavy at baseline), pain between 2 dressing changes, peri-ulcer skin erythema, oedema, foul odour
Days 1, 3, 7, 14
Occurrence of adverse events
Time Frame: Day 1-14
Day 1-14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Keith Harding, Cardiff University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CW-0142-11-U358

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leg Ulcers

Clinical Trials on Aquacel® Ag

Subscribe