Efficacy of Wound Care and Reduction of Wound Complications by Use of AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing in MIS TKA

May 12, 2015 updated by: Feng Chih Kuo, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Efficacy of Wound Care and Reduction of Wound Complications by Use of AQUACEL® Ag Surgical Dressing in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty:A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

The investigators hypothesized that AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing would have a significant improvement in the efficacy of wound care and wound complications compared with traditional Sofra-Tulle® dressings after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Traditional adhesive dressing (Mepore®; Mölnlycke Health Care) for low limb arthroplasty wounds had blistering up to 26%. The jubilee dressing, which consisted of a highly absorbent Hydrofiber inner layer and (Aquacel; ConvaTec Inc.) and a viscoelastic hydrocolloid outer layer (DuoDERM Extra Thin; ConvaTec Inc.), was introduced for lower limb arthroplasty wounds with lower blistering rate (2% vs. 18%) and lower surgical site infection (1% vs. 3%) compared to traditional adhesive dressing. A new modern dressing regime (Aquacel Ag Surgical dressing; ConvaTec Inc.) also reported longer wear time, less dressing change and less blistering.

In our institution, the standard wound care after TKA was an antimicrobial dressing (Sofra-Tulle®; Royal Chem. & Pharm. Co., Kaohsiung, Taiwan) in the inner layer and gauzes in the outer layer.

The investigators hypothesized that AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing would have a significant improvement in the efficacy of wound care and wound complications compared with traditional Sofra-Tulle® dressings after MIS-TKA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

285

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Two hundred and eighty five patients who were scheduled for primary unilateral MIS-TKA were enrolled in the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with condition/comorbidity that could compromise wound healing, including varicose eczema, peripheral vascular disease, receiving immunosuppressive medications, corticosteroid abuse, chronic skin disease around the knee (e.g. psoriasis and chronic eczema) and having prior knee replacement, osteotomy or fracture of the ipsilateral knee.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing
AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing is used to cover the surgical wound in the OR. Clinical indications for removal of the AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing were leakage from the dressing beyond the hydrocolloid exterior layer and more than a 50% saturation of the Hydrofiber® inner layer.
The AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing was applied to the wound in the operating theater by the surgeon. Clinical indications for removal of the AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing were leakage from the dressing beyond the hydrocolloid exterior layer and more than a 50% saturation of the Hydrofiber® inner layer10. If there were no indications to change the dressing, it was changed at the day of discharge usually the 4th or 5th postoperative day (POD) and remained cover of the wound for 7 days except for exudate across the dressing.
Active Comparator: Sofra-Tulla® dressing
The Sofra-Tulle® dressing was used in the OR and routinely changed at a daily basis. If there were strikethrough on the gauze, the nursing staff would proceed the dressing change automatically between the daily routine.
The Sofra-Tulle® dressing was applied to the wound in the operating theater by the surgeon. The Sofra-Tulle® dressing was routinely changed at a daily basis. If there were strikethrough on the gauze, the nursing staff would proceed the dressing change automatically between the daily routine. After discharge from the hospital, the family who had been taught well to do this job during the patient's stay in the hospital conducted the daily dressing change.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Care Efficacy
Time Frame: an expected average of 5 days at the duration of hospital stay
Wear time, No. of dressing change,
an expected average of 5 days at the duration of hospital stay
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
Time Frame: Three months after surgery
Blister formation, wound erythema, discharge and necrosis
Three months after surgery
ASEPSIS score
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissue, Isolation of bacteria and Stay as inpatient
2 weeks after surgery
Surgical site infection (SSI)
Time Frame: Three months after surgery
Superficial or deep infection of the wound
Three months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: two weeks after surgery
overall pain management, and removal when using the dressings
two weeks after surgery
Comfort scale
Time Frame: two weeks after surgery
The dressing is comfort in use and ease of application (excellent, good, fair or poor)
two weeks after surgery
Ease scale
Time Frame: two weeks after surgery
The dressing is ease of application and removal (excellent, good, fair or poor)
two weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Feng-Chih Kuo, MD, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMPRG8C0711

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complication

Clinical Trials on AQUACEL® Ag Surgical dressing (study group)

3
Subscribe