Dextromethorphan for Diabetic Macular Edema (MiDME2)

A Pilot Phase I/II Study for the Evaluation of Dextromethorphan as a Microglia Inhibitor in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (MiDME2)

Background: Many people with diabetes have macular edema (swelling) at the back of the eye. Macular edema can cause loss of vision. Studies suggest that inflammation may be involved in the swelling. A drug called dextromethorphan may help prevent the inflammation and the swelling. Dextromethorphan is approved for use as a cough medicine, but it has not been studied to see if it can help in diabetic macular edema.

Objectives: To see if dextromethorphan can help treat diabetic macular edema.

Eligibility: Individuals at least 18 years of age who have diabetic macular edema in at least one eye.

Design:

• This study lasts 2 years, and will require at least 14 visits to the National Eye Institute outpatient clinic. Study visits will be every month for the first 2 months and then every other month. Each visit will take about 2 to 4 hours.
• Participants will be screened with a physical exam, medical history, eye exam, and blood tests. One eye with macular edema will be chosen as the study eye for testing.
• Participants will take dextromethorphan twice a day, about 12 hours apart, for 2 years. A study diary will help keep track of the date, time, and number of pills taken.
• Participants will have study visits once a month for the first 2 months and then every other month for the rest of the study. Each study visit will involve eye exams and blood and urine tests.
• Four months after starting the study medication, participants may have laser surgery or other treatments for the macular edema, if it is needed.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Diabetic Macular Edema
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Dextromethorphan hydrobromide

Detailed Description

Objective:

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of blindness in the United States. A frequent manifestation of DR is diabetic macular edema (DME) for which the only proven treatment is laser photocoagulation. In the retina, microglia are capable of migrating through the retina to sites of inflammation to associate closely with neurons and the vasculature, and are key cellular players in the mediation of processes of chronic inflammation implicated in DME. For these reasons, microglia represent a promising cellular target for forms of therapy that limit the deleterious inflammatory changes found in DR. The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of dextromethorphan as a microglia inhibitor in participants with DME.

Study Population:

Eligibility criteria include presence of diabetic retinopathy with retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema within 3000 μm of the center of the macula as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and visual acuity better than 20/200 in the study eye.

Design:

Five participants will be initially enrolled in this unmasked pilot study. However, up to an additional three participants may be enrolled to account for participants who withdraw from the study prior to receipt of six months of study treatment. Participants will take an oral dose of 60 mg of dextromethorphan twice daily for 24 months. During each visit, participants will have their visual acuity measured and will undergo OCT testing to measure retinal thickness. Beginning at the Month 4 visit, participants will be assessed for worsening disease defined as loss of ≥ 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters of vision compared to baseline or a ≥ 50% increase in total central retinal thickness as measured by OCT. Individual participants deemed to have worsening disease may stay on the study and continue to receive study medication, but will be allowed to receive focal laser therapy for any amenable leaking microaneurysms and/or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections (such as bevacizumab or ranibizumab) at the discretion of the treating physician. Additionally, beginning at the Month 6 visit, participants will be eligible for treatment, with either focal laser or anti-VEGF injections if they have center-involving macular edema.

Outcome Measures:

The primary outcome is the change in retinal thickness measured by OCT at 6 months compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes include the change in retinal thickness as measured by OCT at 12, 18 and 24 months compared to baseline, change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months compared to baseline, change in mean macular sensitivity as measured by microperimetry at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months compared to baseline, as well as changes in fluid leakage in the macula as demonstrated by fluorescein angiography at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months compared to baseline. Safety outcomes include the number and severity of systemic and ocular toxicities, and adverse events.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 7
• Phase: Phase 2; Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Maryland
    • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
      • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

1. Participant is 18 years of age or older.
2. Participant must understand and sign the protocol's informed consent document.
3. Female participants of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breast-feeding, must have a negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to initiation of study medication and must be willing to undergo urine pregnancy tests throughout the study.

4. Female participants of childbearing potential and male participants able to father children must have (or have a partner who has) had a hysterectomy or vasectomy, be completely abstinent from intercourse or must agree to practice two acceptable methods of contraception throughout the course of the study and for one week after study medication discontinuation. Acceptable methods of contraception include:

   • hormonal contraception (i.e., birth control pills, injected hormones, dermal patch or vaginal ring),
   • intrauterine device,
   • barrier methods (diaphragm, condom) with spermicide, or
   • surgical sterilization (hysterectomy or tubal ligation).
5. Participant must agree to notify the study investigator or coordinator if any of his/her doctors initiate a new medication during the course of this study.
6. Participant must agree not to take medications containing dextromethorphan during the course of this study.
7. Participant must have normal renal function and liver function, or have mild abnormalities no greater than grade 1 as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE).

8. Participant has a diagnosis of diabetic mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:

   • Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes;
   • Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes;
   • Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association (ADA) and/or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

9. Participant has documented hemoglobin A1C 12% or less within one month of baseline.

   • Participants with elevated hemoglobin A1C but within the 12% or less cutoff will undergo appropriate evaluation, and unstable patients will be excluded according to the investigator's best medical judgment.
   • Participant agrees to refrain from consuming grapefruit juice, grapefruits and Seville oranges at any time while s/he is enrolled in this study.
10. Participant has at least one eye that meets the study eye criteria listed below.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Participant is in another investigational study and actively receiving another study medication for diabetic macular edema (DME).
2. Participant is unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits.
3. Participant has a known hypersensitivity to sodium fluorescein dye.

4. Participant has a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control).

   • Patients in poor glycemic control who, within the last four months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next four months should not be enrolled.

5. Participant has a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.
6. Participant has a history of hepatitis or liver failure.
7. Participant has an allergy or hypersensitivity to dextromethorphan or levorphanol.
8. Participant is taking or has taken within the last 14 days any medication that could adversely interact with dextromethorphan such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) including but not limited to the following: almotriptan; amitriptyline; amoxapine; bromocriptine; buspirone; cabergoline; citalopram; clomipramine; desipramine; desvenlafaxine; dihydroergotamine; doxepin; duloxetine; eletriptan; ergoloid mesylates; ergotamine; escitalopram; fluoxetine; fluvoxamine; frovatriptan; imipramine; isocarboxazid; linezolid; lithium; maprotiline; meperidine; methylergonovine; milnacipran; mirtazapine; moclobemide; naratriptan; nefazodone; nortriptyline; paroxetine; phenelzine; procarbazine; promethazine; protriptyline; rasagiline; rizatriptan; SAMe (S-adenosylmethionine); selegiline; sertraline; sibutramine; St. Johns wort; sumatriptan; tapentadol; tramadol; tranylcypromine; trazodone; trimipramine; tryptophan; venlafaxine; vilazodone; zolmitriptan.

9. Participant has a blood pressure of > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110).

   • If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, a patient can become eligible.

10. Participant has a history of treatment with systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents or steroids within three months prior to study entry.

Study Eye Inclusion Criteria

1. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score of 34 letters or better (i.e., 20/200 or better).
2. Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema, based on clinical examination, that is not refractory to further therapy as based on the investigator's clinical judgment.
3. Retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 μm of the center of the macula, as measured by Spectral optical coherence tomography (OCT).
4. Media clarity, pupillary dilation and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs.

Study Eye Exclusion Criteria

1. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.

   An eye should not be considered eligible if:

   • The macular edema is considered to be related to cataract extraction; or
   • Clinical exam and/or OCT suggest that vitreoretinal interface disease (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) is the primary cause of the macular edema.
2. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, non-retinal condition).
3. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetic retinopathy (DR) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.).
4. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by three lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
5. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within four months prior to study entry.
6. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy within six months prior to study entry.
7. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within three months prior to study entry.
8. History of Yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) capsulotomy performed within two months prior to study entry.
9. History of treatment within three months prior to enrollment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry, such as intravitreal or periocular steroids or intravitreal anti-VEGF agents.

Choice of Study Eye in Cases of Bilateral Disease

If both eyes of a participant meet the criteria described above, the following will be used to determine the study eye:

1. If one eye is treatment-naïve and the other is not, the treatment-naïve eye will be chosen as the study eye.
2. If both eyes are treatment-naïve, the eye with the better visual acuity will be chosen as the study eye.
3. If both eyes are treatment-naïve and are equivalent, the choice of study eye will be determined at the investigator's discretion after consultation with the participant.
4. If both eyes have been previously treated, the choice of study eye will be determined at the investigator's discretion after consultation with the participant.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dextromethorphan hydrobromide	Drug: Dextromethorphan hydrobromide; Participants instructed to take 60 mg dextromethorphan capsules orally two times a day for 24 months.; Other Names: Delsym; Creomulsion; Benylin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to Baseline	Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria. The eye not chosen as the study eye is referred to as the "fellow eye."	Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to Baseline	Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid.	Baseline and 12 Months
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to Baseline	Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid.	Baseline and 18 Months
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to Baseline	Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid.	Baseline and 24 Months
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to Baseline	Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.	Baseline and 6 Months
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to Baseline	Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.	Baseline and 12 Months
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to Baseline	Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.	Baseline and 18 Months
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to Baseline	Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.	Baseline and 24 Months
Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 6 Months Compared to Baseline	Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD).	Baseline and 6 Months
Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 12 Months Compared to Baseline	Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD).	Baseline and 12 Months
Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 18 Months Compared to Baseline	Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD).	Baseline and 18 Months
Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 24 Months Compared to Baseline	Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD).	Baseline and 24 Months
Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to Baseline	Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity.	Baseline and 6 Months
Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to Baseline	Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity.	Baseline and 12 Months
Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to Baseline	Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity.	Baseline and 18 Months
Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to Baseline	Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity.	Baseline and 24 Months
Number of Participants Withdrawn From the Study Therapy Due to Vision Loss or Adverse Events		Duration of the study, up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: National Eye Institute (NEI)
• Collaborators: The Emmes Company, LLC
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Catherine A Cukras, MD, PhD, National Eye Institute (NEI)

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kempen JH, O'Colmain BJ, Leske MC, Haffner SM, Klein R, Moss SE, Taylor HR, Hamman RF; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):552-63. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.552.
• Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984 Dec;91(12):1464-74. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34102-1.
• Ferris FL 3rd, Patz A. Macular edema: a major complication of diabetic retinopathy. Trans New Orleans Acad Ophthalmol. 1983;31:307-16. No abstract available.
• Valent DJ, Wong WT, Chew EY, Cukras CA. Oral Dextromethorphan for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Results From a Phase I/II Clinical Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Dec 17;7(6):24. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.6.24. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Helpful Links

• NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: August 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2014
• Study Completion (Actual): December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 24, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 24, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): September 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 28, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 20, 2020
• Last Verified: January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Diabetic Macular Edema; Dextromethorphan; Microglia
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Eye Diseases; Retinal Degeneration; Retinal Diseases; Macular Degeneration; Macular Edema; Edema; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Neurotransmitter Agents; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Excitatory Amino Acid Agents; Respiratory System Agents; Antitussive Agents; Dextromethorphan
• Other Study ID Numbers: 110244; 11-EI-0244 (Other Identifier: NIH CNS IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No