Self-directed Upper Limb Training Using a SaeboFlex in Acute Stroke (SaeboFlex)

Self-directed Upper Limb Training Using a SaeboFlex With Acute Stroke Patients: 8 Single Case Reviews

Arm and hand weakness as a result of stroke occurs in approximately 70% of stroke survivors and causes huge loss of function and independence. A wide range of treatment approaches have been developed to improve motor recovery. Despite treatments, such as Constraint Induced Movement Therapy, showing promise, these in large have been have focused on high-intensity and repetitive task-specific practice. Patients with little hand or finger movements however may not be able to participate actively in task specific training.

The SaeboFlex is a dynamic orthosis, with a spring-loaded feature that facilitates opening of the fingers and hand. This allows the patient to grasp and release objects repeatedly, hence enabling participation in repetitive task practice and increasing potential for motor recovery. Despite the SaeboFlex being used successfully in several centers in the country and internationally, research to provide evidence of effectiveness is scarce. As a consequence funding for the SaeboFlex is limited and usually requires patients' to fund their own.

The study aims to explore the potential benefits and feasibility of participating in a Self-directed SaeboFlex training program to allow repetitive task practice in patients early after stroke.

Subjects will undergo a 12-week training program comprising of a maximum of 3 x 45 minute sessions a day. Activities focus on grasping and releasing balls and reaching for targets, wearing the SaeboFlex for the majority of the session. At the end of each session the SaeboFlex is removed and the hand is incorporated into functional tasks as able. Subjects will be set individualized training program by a Saebo-trained therapist. The program will be graded and progressed at a rate that is appropriate to each individual.

The study will measure and follow-up 8 subjects to explore improvements in recovery and functional ability of the upper limb and affect on dependency levels. It will also explore the level of intensity patients early after stroke can tolerate and how they participate in self-directed therapy. All patients will meet the inclusion criteria and be motivated to undergo the specific SaeboFlex self-directed training program. Subjects will record the time and intensity of their training sessions and also their routine upper limb therapy. Patients will be assessed before, during and after the 3 months training. If these cases show promise the study will support the need for large trials including clinical efficacy and dose finding studies.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

8

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Essex
      • Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom, CO45JL
        • Recruiting
        • Colchester Hospital University Foundational NHS Trust
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rebecca Stuck, BSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Subjects will:

  • Be either in-patients on Colchester Stroke Unit or,
  • Out-patients following an acute stroke admission to Colchester Stroke Unit
  • Be adults who have suffered a stroke between 3 and 84 days before recruitment
  • Have an anterior circulation stroke - i.e. must have weakness not ataxia
  • Have a substantially paretic hand and fingers and meet the criteria for the SaeboFlex orthosis as below
  • Have a previously fully functional upper limb (i.e. previous weakness, severe movement disorders, severe Rheumatoid Arthritis )
  • Be able to participate in self directed therapy (i.e. no severe visual or cognitive deficits precluding participation task repetitive practice and recording training times)
  • Are medically fit to participate in repetitive task practice as determined by the consultant (or GP if out-patient).

Saebo Flex requirements (inclusion criteria)

Subjects must have:

  • A minimum of 15 degrees passive wrist extension (fingers must be extended)
  • At least 15 degrees active shoulder motion in any plane
  • At least 15 degrees elbow flexion
  • At least ¼ range of active finger flexion (IP) flexion

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients that are able to open and close his/her hand completely, 10 times keeping the wrist neutral while maintaining his / her maximum shoulder flexion are too good for the Saebo-flex. Other treatment options should be considered.
  • Severe joint deformities that could be worsened by using an orthosis, i.e. RA
  • Those patients with extremely poor skin integrity which may be cause irritation or skin damage.
  • We will not exclude stroke survivors on the basis of age or gender but subjects will need to be motivated for self-directed study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 8 individual case reviews
SaeboFlex Self-directed training

Participants undergo a 12 week self directed upper limb training programme with the SaeboFlex upper limb orthosis. Training consists of a maximum of 3 x 45 minute sessions a day.

Participants are closely monitored at least once a week by a saebo-trained therapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in upper limb function to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Ability to use the paretic upper limb in functional activity. The ARAT is a test of upper limb function with subsections covering grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement. As the SaeboFlex is aimed at achieving grasp and release this measure appears very appropriate. It has good validity and reliability and is widely used in clinical research.
Change from Baseline in upper limb function to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Motricity Index (MI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in upper limb voluntary contraction to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
The Motricity Index (MI) is a clinical measure of the ability to voluntarily contract paretic muscle. It is an ordinal score with six levels of measurement within each of three categories for the upper limb (pinch grip, elbow flexion and shoulder abduction), has been used widely in clinical research, is valid, reliable and sensitive to change after stroke.
Change from Baseline in upper limb voluntary contraction to 4, 8 and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Assessment Scale- Upper Limb Section (UL-MAS).
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in upper limb function to 12 weeks
The UL-MAS covers three upper limb subsets: upper arm function (six), hand movements and advanced hand activities. Each subtest is scored out of 6, with a maximum score of 18. It has quite recently been recommend that the UL-MAS should be scored non-hierarchally, meaning that every item within the subsets should be scored regardless of its place within the hierarchy. The acceptable internal consistency score obtained verifies the validity and reliability of using the UL-MAS as an independent scale.
Change from Baseline in upper limb function to 12 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks
A Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) is a type of rating scale that is commonly used to measuring an individuals' rating of their own health. A scale from 1 to10 shall be used for a subjective score of how much the subject rates his or her ability to use their arm in functional tasks
Change from Baseline to 12 weeks
Modified Barthel Index (MBI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in Independence level to 4, 8 and 12 weeks

The Modified Barthel Index is used in the stroke pathway on the ward as part of routine practice.

It is widely used as assessment tools for clinical decision-making and outcome measurement in clinical research. It has good inter-rater reliability. The original Barthel Index was modified to increase sensitivity to change in functional ability and levels of dependence.

Change from Baseline in Independence level to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 12 weeks
The Stroke Impact Scale was developed based on feedback from patients and their caregivers. It measures the aspects of stroke recovery which were found to be important to patients and caregivers as well as stroke experts. After intensive psychometric testing the 59 item Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0 was developed. The 59 questions of the SIS are broken down into eight domains including strength, hand function, mobility, and activities of daily living, emotion, memory, communication and social participation
Change from Baseline to 12 weeks
Berg Balance Test
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in balance to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
The Berg Balance Scale has been identified as the most commonly used assessment tool across the continuum from acute care to community-based care in stroke rehabilitation. It has been demonstrated to have strong psychometric properties and be sensitive to change. Balance is not directly linked to independence but is a good predictor of mobility levels and risk of falls, and therefore considered an important measure to include.
Change from Baseline in balance to 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
These will be carried out at the end of the 12 week training period. The interview will include a set list of questions with open ended answers to enable patients to describe how they found the training and whether their expectations were met.
12 weeks
Adverse effects or events monitoring and recording
Time Frame: throughout 12 weeks
Any complaints of pain, prolonged reduction in function, reduction on soft tissue length, tone or effects on skin integrity are unexpected but will be closely monitored and recorded
throughout 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Stuck, BSc, Colchester Hospital University Foundation NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 17, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Self-directed Upper Limb SaeboFlex Training

Subscribe