- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01474200
Study of Heart Failure Hospitalizations After Aquapheresis Therapy Compared to Intravenous (IV) Diuretic Treatment (AVOID-HF)
August 3, 2023 updated by: Nuwellis, Inc.
Aquapheresis Versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalizations for Heart Failure (AVOID-HF)
The purpose of the research is to determine if patients have fewer Heart Failure (HF) events after receiving Aquapheresis (AQ) therapy compared to intravenous (IV) diuretics up to 90 days of discharge from the hospital.
Heart Failure events are defined as returning to the hospital, clinic or emergency department (ED) for treatment of HF symptoms.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of the proposed AVOID-HF study is to confirm and expand the findings that fluid removal by AQ reduces HF rehospitalizations at 90 days as well as the length of these HF rehospitalizations.
In the "Ultrafiltration Versus Intravenous Diuretics for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure" (UNLOAD) study, the 90 day HF re-hospitalizations were pre-specified secondary end-points.
AVOID-HF is designed with a primary end-point to determine if AQ reduces the number of HF events (Rehospitalization or unscheduled outpatient or emergency room treatment for HF) after discharge from index hospitalization compared to IV loop diuretics.
AVOID will also explore days alive and out of the hospital as a secondary end-point, which was not done in UNLOAD.
In other words, the AVOID-HF study is going beyond studying only the amount of fluid removal and will explore whether the modality of fluid removal influences HF outcomes.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
224
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
- Heart Center Research
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
- Scottsdale Healthcare Research Institute
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85054
- Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
- UCLA
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92123
- San Diego Cardiac Center
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92037
- University of California, San Diego (UCSD)
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
- Washington Hospital Center
-
-
Florida
-
Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
- Morton Plant Medical Center
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University
-
-
Illinois
-
Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60208
- Northwestern University
-
Naperville, Illinois, United States, 60566
- Edward Hospital Center for Advanced Heart Failure
-
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States, 60181
- Advocate Health & Hospitals Corporation
-
-
Indiana
-
Elkhart, Indiana, United States, 46514
- Elkhart General Healthcare
-
Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46804
- Northern Indiana Research Alliance
-
-
Iowa
-
Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50316
- Iowa Health - Des Moines
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
- Hennepin County Medical Center
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
- University of Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
- Minneapolis VA Medical Center
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
- Saint Luke's Hospital and Saint Luke's Cardiovascular Consultants
-
-
New Jersey
-
Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey, United States, 08234
- AtlantiCare Health Network
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87102
- New Mexico Heart Institute/Heart Hospital
-
-
North Carolina
-
Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28803
- Asheville Cardiology Associates
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
- University of Cincinnati
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
- Metrohealth Systems
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- The Ohio State University
-
Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45415
- Good Samaritan Hospital - Dayton
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74104
- Oklahoma Heart Institute and Hillcrest Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Abington, Pennsylvania, United States, 19001
- Abington Memorial Hospital
-
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18018
- St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19141
- Albert Einstein Medical Center
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19102
- Drexel University College of Medicine
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37205
- Saint Thomas Hospital
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78234
- Brooke Army Medical Center
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
-
-
Washington
-
Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98405
- MultiCare Health System/Tacoma General Hospital
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
- Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Male or non-pregnant female patients
- Admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF)
- On regularly scheduled oral loop diuretics prior to admission
Fluid overload manifested by at least two of the following:
- Pitting edema (2+) of the lower extremities
- Jugular venous distention > 8 cm
- Pulmonary edema or pleural effusion on chest x-ray
- Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea or ≥ two- pillow orthopnea
- Respiration rate ≥ 20 per minute.
- Have received ≤ 2 IV loop diuretics doses before randomization
- Must be able to be enrolled into the trial ≤ 24 hours of their admission to the hospital.
- Provide written informed consent form as required by the local IRB (Institutional Review Board)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Renal insufficiency with a sCr ≥ 3.0 mg/dl or planned renal replacement therapies
- Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg at time of enrollment
- Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension not secondary to left heart disease
- Contraindications to systemic anticoagulation
- Hematocrit > 45%
- Inability to obtain venous access
- Hemodynamic instability severe enough to require IV positive inotropic agents, IV vasodilators or both
- Use of iodinated radiocontrast material within the previous 72 hours or planned study requiring IV contrast during the current hospitalization
- Severe concomitant disease expected to prolong hospitalization
- Severe concomitant disease expected to cause death in ≤ 90 days
- Sepsis or ongoing systemic infection
- Severe uncorrected valvular stenosis
- Active myocarditis
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
- Constrictive pericarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy
- Liver cirrhosis
- Previous solid organ transplant
- Requirement for mechanical ventilatory support
- Presence of a mechanical circulatory support device
- Unwillingness or inability to complete follow up
- Active drug or ETOH substance abuse
- Participating in another interventional clinical trial
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Aquapheresis (AQ) - isolated veno-venous ultrafiltration
Excess fluid from the patient is removed by isolated veno-venous ultrafiltration treatment using the Aquadex Flex Flow System
|
Aquapheresis treatment (isolated veno-venous ultrafiltration) using the Aquadex FlexFlow System during index hospitalization until the patient's signs and symptoms of fluid overload have improved to the satisfaction of the treating physician.
Ultrafiltration rates, duration and frequency of treatment are dependent on the amount of patient fluid excess and on the rate of fluid movement from the interstitial spaces into the vascular compartment during Aquapheresis (Plasma Refill Rate, or PRR)
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: IV Loop Diuretics (LD)
Excess fluid from the patient is removed by IV (Intravenous) loop diuretic treatment
|
IV Loop Diuretics treatment using only FDA approved IV loop diuretics indicated for the treatment of patients with fluid overload.
This includes furosemide or other IV loop diuretics administered at equivalent doses to furosemide.
Patients will receive either a twice daily IV bolus or continuous IV LD infusions according to the high dose protocol of the"Diuretic strategies in patients wth acute decompensated heart failure" (DOSE) trial.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Heart Failure (HF) Event
Time Frame: 90 days after discharge from index HF hospitalization.
|
Time to first HF event within 90 days after discharge from index HF hospitalization. HF events are defined as
|
90 days after discharge from index HF hospitalization.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
EFFICACY: Total Fluid Removed During the Index Hospitalization
Time Frame: Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
AQ-Fluid removed by AQ plus urine voided versus urine voided when treated with IV diuretics
|
Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
|
EFFICACY: Net Fluid Removed During the Index Hospitalization
Time Frame: Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
AQ-Fluid removed by AQ plus urine voided minus fluid intake versus urine voided minus fluid intake with the IV diuretics.
|
Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
|
EFFICACY: Weight Loss at 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment
Time Frame: 72 hours after treatment initiation
|
Weight at 72 hours after treatment initiation minus weight at treatment initiation.
Negative mean values indicate weight loss.
|
72 hours after treatment initiation
|
|
EFFICACY: Total Weight Loss During the Index Hospitalization
Time Frame: Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
Weight at hospital discharge minus weight at hospital admission.
Negative mean values indicate weight loss.
|
Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
|
EFFICACY: Time to Freedom From Congestion
Time Frame: Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
Time from hospital admission to time patient is free of congestion in the hospital.
Freedom from congestion is defined as jugular venous distention of < or equal to 8 cm, with no orthopnea and with trace peripheral edema or no edema.
Measurement taken every 24 hours after treatment initiation.
|
Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
|
EFFICACY: Freedom From Congestion
Time Frame: Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
Defined as jugular venous distention of < or equal to 8 cm, with no orthopnea, and with trace peripheral edema or no edema at hospital discharge
|
Index Hospitalization, an average of 8 days
|
|
EFFICACY: Changes in B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Levels Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and at 72 hours from baseline, hospital discharge and at 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Change in BNP levels over time at 72 hours, discharge, and 90 days after discharge.
|
Baseline and at 72 hours from baseline, hospital discharge and at 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
CLINICAL: Total Number of Days Rehospitalized for Heart Failure (HF) at 30 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Days rehospitalized for HF symptoms requiring hospital, emergency room or clinic treatment involving the use of IV diuretics and /or positive inotropic or vasodilator drugs.
|
Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
CLINICAL: Total Number of Emergency Department (ED) or Unscheduled Office Visits at 30 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Number of visits for HF symptoms requiring ED or clinic treatment involving the use of IV diuretics and /or positive inotropic or vasodilator drugs
|
Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
CLINICAL: Total Number of Heart Failure (HF) Rehospitalizations at 30 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Number of different times patient was admitted to hospital for HF symptoms within 90 days of index hospitalization discharge.
|
Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
CLINICAL: Total Number of Cardiovascular (CV) Rehospitalizations at 30 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
CV symptoms that required hospitalization for treatment within 90 days of index hospitalization discharge.
|
Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
CLINICAL: Total Number of Days for Cardiovascular (CV) Rehospitalizations at 30 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
The total number of days spent in the hospital due to CV related events at 30 days and 90 days from hospital discharge.
|
Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
CLINICAL: All Cause Rehospitalization Rates at 30 and 90 Days
Time Frame: Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Any cause that required hospitalization for treatment within 90 days of index hospitalization discharge.
|
Within 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
CLINICAL: Global Clinical Score at 30 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 90 days after hospital discharge
|
KCCQ Questionnaire analysis based on patient's self-assessment of how they feel at various intervals compared to how they felt prior to index treatment.
Scores were transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Within 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
SAFETY: Changes in Renal Function (Serum Creatinine) After Treatment up to 90 Days After Randomization
Time Frame: Within 90 days of randomization
|
Changes in renal function prior to index treatment compared to various intervals by assessing the patient's serum creatinine (sCr), Blood Urea Nitrogen(BUN), BUN/sCr ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
|
Within 90 days of randomization
|
|
SAFETY: Changes in Renal Function (Blood Urea Nitrogen) After Treatment up to 90 Days After Randomization
Time Frame: Within 90 days of randomization
|
Changes in renal function prior to index treatment compared to various intervals by assessing the patient's serum creatinine (sCr), Blood Urea Nitrogen(BUN), BUN/sCr ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
|
Within 90 days of randomization
|
|
SAFETY: Changes in Renal Function (Blood Urea Nitrogen/Serum Creatinine) After Treatment up to 90 Days After Randomization
Time Frame: Within 90 days of randomization
|
Changes in renal function prior to index treatment compared to various intervals by assessing the patient's serum creatinine (sCr), Blood Urea Nitrogen(BUN), BUN/sCr ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
|
Within 90 days of randomization
|
|
SAFETY: Changes in Renal Function (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) After Treatment up to 90 Days After Randomization
Time Frame: Within 90 days of randomization
|
Changes in renal function prior to index treatment compared to various intervals by assessing the patient's serum creatinine (sCr), Blood Urea Nitrogen(BUN), BUN/sCr ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula
|
Within 90 days of randomization
|
|
Length of Stay (LOS) During the Index Hospitalization
Time Frame: Index hospitalization admission to index hospitalization discharge
|
Number of days patient is in hospital for HF treatment.
|
Index hospitalization admission to index hospitalization discharge
|
|
Mortality Rates Within Index Hospitalization or Within 90 Days After Hospital Discharge.
Time Frame: Time from randomization to 90 days post-hospital discharge
|
Death due to any cause within index hospitalization and 90 days following hospital discharge.
|
Time from randomization to 90 days post-hospital discharge
|
|
Days Alive and Out of Hospital at 30 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Number of days patients were alive and out of the hospital at 30 and 90 days after discharge.
|
Within 30 and 90 days after hospital discharge
|
|
Quality of Life Assessed Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 30, 60 and 90 Days After Discharge
Time Frame: Within 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Questionnaire assessed patients quality of life prior to index treatment versus timeframes following hospital discharge.
Scores were transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
|
Within 90 days after hospital discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maria Rosa Costanzo, MD, Midwest Heart Foundation
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Adams KF Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, Berkowitz RL, Galvao M, Horton DP; ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J. 2005 Feb;149(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.08.005.
- Costanzo MR, Guglin ME, Saltzberg MT, Jessup ML, Bart BA, Teerlink JR, Jaski BE, Fang JC, Feller ED, Haas GJ, Anderson AS, Schollmeyer MP, Sobotka PA; UNLOAD Trial Investigators. Ultrafiltration versus intravenous diuretics for patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 13;49(6):675-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.073. Epub 2007 Jan 26. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 13;49(10):1136.
- Sharma A, Hermann DD, Mehta RL. Clinical benefit and approach of ultrafiltration in acute heart failure. Cardiology. 2001;96(3-4):144-54. doi: 10.1159/000047398.
- Marenzi G, Lauri G, Grazi M, Assanelli E, Campodonico J, Agostoni P. Circulatory response to fluid overload removal by extracorporeal ultrafiltration in refractory congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Oct;38(4):963-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01479-6.
- Rimondini A, Cipolla CM, Della Bella P, Grazi S, Sisillo E, Susini G, Guazzi MD. Hemofiltration as short-term treatment for refractory congestive heart failure. Am J Med. 1987 Jul;83(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90495-5.
- Jaski BE, Ha J, Denys BG, Lamba S, Trupp RJ, Abraham WT. Peripherally inserted veno-venous ultrafiltration for rapid treatment of volume overloaded patients. J Card Fail. 2003 Jun;9(3):227-31. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.28.
- Domanski M, Norman J, Pitt B, Haigney M, Hanlon S, Peyster E; Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Diuretic use, progressive heart failure, and death in patients in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20;42(4):705-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00765-4.
- Bart BA, Boyle A, Bank AJ, Anand I, Olivari MT, Kraemer M, Mackedanz S, Sobotka PA, Schollmeyer M, Goldsmith SR. Ultrafiltration versus usual care for hospitalized patients with heart failure: the Relief for Acutely Fluid-Overloaded Patients With Decompensated Congestive Heart Failure (RAPID-CHF) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 6;46(11):2043-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.098. Epub 2005 Nov 4.
- Drazner MH, Rame JE, Stevenson LW, Dries DL. Prognostic importance of elevated jugular venous pressure and a third heart sound in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):574-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010641.
- Jain P, Massie BM, Gattis WA, Klein L, Gheorghiade M. Current medical treatment for the exacerbation of chronic heart failure resulting in hospitalization. Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2 Suppl):S3-17. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.149. No abstract available.
- Costanzo MR, Saltzberg M, O'Sullivan J, Sobotka P. Early ultrafiltration in patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 6;46(11):2047-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.099. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
- Bart BA, Goldsmith SR, Lee KL, Givertz MM, O'Connor CM, Bull DA, Redfield MM, Deswal A, Rouleau JL, LeWinter MM, Ofili EO, Stevenson LW, Semigran MJ, Felker GM, Chen HH, Hernandez AF, Anstrom KJ, McNulty SE, Velazquez EJ, Ibarra JC, Mascette AM, Braunwald E; Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Ultrafiltration in decompensated heart failure with cardiorenal syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 13;367(24):2296-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210357. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 15, 2011
First Posted (Estimated)
November 18, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 29, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 3, 2023
Last Verified
August 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1494 (CSL Behring)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Isolated veno-venous ultrafiltration (AQ)
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Medical University of GrazRecruitingEnd Stage Kidney DiseaseAustria
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzCompletedAcute Renal FailureGermany
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzWithdrawnSeptic Shock | Severe SepsisGermany
-
Turku University HospitalUniversity of TurkuRecruitingSeptic Shock | Acute Kidney InjuryFinland
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedCerebral Embolism | Complication of Dialysis | Thrombus Due to Renal Dialysis Device, Implant, or GraftAustria
-
University of ZurichHannover Medical School; University Hospital, BonnNot yet recruitingAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Corona Virus Infection | Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
-
Heidelberg UniversityCompletedAcute Renal Failure | DialysisGermany
-
MexbrainIntegrated Scientific Services (ISS) AGTerminatedHepatolenticular Degeneration; WilsonSpain, France
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedHepatic Encephalopathy | Intracranial Hypertension | Acute Liver FailureDenmark