Transfusion-requirements in Septic Shock Trial (TRISS)

October 2, 2014 updated by: Anders Perner, Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group

Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Septic Shock

Patients with blood poisoning - sepsis - often receive blood transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that blood transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the blood may be harmful to some of these patients. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in these very sick patients

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background Septic patients often receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that RBC transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the intervention may be harmful to some of these patients. In contrast, current guidelines recommend restrictive transfusion of RBC for critical ill patients without septic shock. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in patients with septic shock

Design Pragmatic, multicenter, randomised, outcome assessment-blinded trial of patients with septic shock to RBC transfusion at haemoglobin (Hb) transfusion trigger of 7 g/dl (4.4 mM) or 9 g/dl (5.6 mM), stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria:

To increase the validity of the trial inclusion criteria will be broad with few exclusions

Outcome measures The outcome measures will mainly be patient-important but ICU- and hospital length of stay will also be assessed

Trial size 2 x 500 patients will be needed to show a 9% absolute risk difference in 90-day mortality (baseline mortality of 45%, relative risk reduction 20% (from septic patients in the TRICC trial), alpha of 0.05 (two-sided) and a beta of 0.20 that is a power of 80% (1-beta).

An interim-analysis will be performed after 500 patients. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DMSC) will recommend that the trial is stopped if a group-difference in 90-day mortality with p<0.001.

Time Line The first patient is expected to be randomised December 1st 2011 and the trial database is expected to be closed early 2014. The main manuscript will be submitted shortly thereafter.

Funding The trial is publicly funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1005

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby
      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Aarhus University Hospital, NBG
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Rigshospitalet
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Bispebjerg Hospital
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Hvidovre Hospital
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Glostrup Hospital
      • Gentofte, Denmark
        • Gentofte Hospital
      • Herning, Denmark
        • Herning Hospital
      • Hjørring, Denmark
        • Hjørring Hospital
      • Holbæk, Denmark
        • Holbæk Hospital
      • Horsens, Denmark
        • Horsens Hospital
      • Kolding, Denmark
        • Kolding Hospital
      • Køge, Denmark
        • Køge Hospital
      • Næstved, Denmark
        • Næstved Hospital
      • Randers, Denmark
        • Randers Hospital
      • Slagelse, Denmark
        • Slagelse Hospital
      • Sønderborg, Denmark
        • Sønderborg Hospital
      • Vejle, Denmark
        • Vejle Hospital
      • Ålborg, Denmark
        • Ålborg university Hospital
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Helsinki University Hospital
      • Joensuu, Finland
        • Joensuu Hospital
      • Tampere, Finland
        • Tampere University Hospital
      • Bergen, Norway
        • Haukeland University Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Akershus University Hospital
      • Stavanger, Norway
        • Stavanger University Hospital
      • Ålesund, Norway
        • Ålesund Hospital
      • Halmstad, Sweden
        • Halmstad Hospital
      • Helsingborg, Sweden
        • Helsingborg Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Sodersjukhuset
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Karolinska Hospital, Huddinge
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Karolinska Institutet Solna
      • Växjö, Sweden
        • Växjö Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient in the ICU AND
  • Fulfil the criteria for septic shock AND
  • Have haemoglobin of 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less AND
  • Consent obtainable from patient or proxy or national law allows delayed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented wish against transfusion OR
  • Previous serious adverse reaction with blood product OR
  • Acute coronary syndrome OR
  • Life-threatening bleeding OR
  • RBC transfusion during current ICU admission OR
  • Withdrawal from active therapy or brain death OR
  • Lack of informed consent (depending on national law) OR
  • Acute burn injury regardless of degree and burn surface area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Liberal blood transfusion
Blood transfusion at haemoglobin 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less
One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin at 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less at point-of-care testing
Other Names:
  • Liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion
One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less at point-of-care testing
Other Names:
  • Restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Restrictive blood transfusion
Blood transfusion at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less
One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin at 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less at point-of-care testing
Other Names:
  • Liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion
One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less at point-of-care testing
Other Names:
  • Restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 90 day
All cause 90 day mortality
90 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days alive and out of hospital
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
Persistent organ failure
Time Frame: Day 5
Defined as need for ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope infusion or renal replacement therapy
Day 5
Persistent organ failure
Time Frame: Day 14
Defined as need for ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope infusion or renal replacement therapy
Day 14
Persistent organ failure
Time Frame: Day 28
Defined as need for ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope infusion or renal replacement therapy
Day 28
Anaphylactic/allergic reactions
Time Frame: Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Defined by the clinician on the basis of mucocutaneous signs and symptoms (e.g. urticaria, pruritus, localised angio- oedema).
Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Haemolytic complications after transfusion of RBC
Time Frame: Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Defined by the clinician on the basis of haemoglobinuria or increased free plasma haemoglobin.
Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Transfusion associated acute lung injury (TRALI)
Time Frame: Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

TRALI defined as:

I. Acute or worsening hypoxaemia ((PaO2/FiO2 < 40 (PaO2 in kPa) or <300 (PaO2 in mmHg) regardless of PEEP) OR > 50% relative increase in FiO2.

AND II. Occurrence within 6 hours after RBC transfusion AND III. Acute or worsening pulmonary infiltrates on frontal chest x-ray OR clinical signs of overt pulmonary oedema

Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO)
Time Frame: Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

TACO defined as:

I. Acute or worsening hypoxaemia ((PaO2/FiO2 < 40 (PaO2 in kPa) or <300 (PaO2 in mmHg) regardless of PEEP) OR > 50% relative increase in FiO2.

AND II. Occurrence within 6 hours after RBC transfusion AND III. Acute or worsening pulmonary infiltrates on frontal chest x-ray OR clinical signs of overt pulmonary oedema AND IV. Increased blood pressure AND VI. Positive fluid balance

Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Ischaemic events
Time Frame: Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Defined as either myocardial, cerebral, intestinal or acute limb ischaemia
Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week
Days alive without life support
Time Frame: 90-days
Life support defined as need for ventilation, vasopressor/inotrope infusion or renal replacement therapy. Days alive without each of these interventions will be reported
90-days
Mortality within the whole observation period
Time Frame: One year after randomisation of the last patient
Mortality within the whole observation period reported at day 28, six-month and 1 year after randomisation of the last patient.
One year after randomisation of the last patient
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
Physical and mental component summary scores of SF 36
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anders Perner, MD, PhD, Dept. of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet / SCCTG

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion

Subscribe