Diagnostic Device Risk Management of Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure (IDENTIFY-HF)

Integrated Diagnostic Evaluation in Non-Therapy DevIces For the studY of Heart Failure

The purpose of this study is to characterize the feasibility and impact of a diagnostic tool that may help clinicians identify when patients are at higher risk of visiting the hospital for a heart failure event. The study will use a non-experimental device that is inserted just under the skin of the chest, which continuously monitors the heart rhythm in combination with an experimental web-based heart failure risk status. Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure will be evaluated to collect data about the potential of this risk status to help improve patient outcome.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Scripps Green
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80012
        • Aurora Denver Cardiology Associates
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Spectrum Health
    • New Jersey
      • Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States, 07450
        • The Valley Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
        • Carolinas Medical Center/Sanger Heart & Vascular
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17602
        • Lancaster Heart & Stroke Foundation
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37205
        • St. Thomas Research Institute
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
      • McAllen, Texas, United States, 78503
        • Heart Clinic PLLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Patient (or patient's legally authorized representative) is willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol, including follow-up visits
  • Documented paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation or strong suspicion of atrial fibrillation (i.e, palpitations)
  • Patient is indicated for the Reveal XT insertable cardiac monitor or other commercially-available and substantially equivalent Medtronic insertable cardiac monitor
  • Recent HF event within prior 120 days (HF event defined as meeting any one of the following two criteria: 1. Admission with primary diagnosis of HF 2. Intravenous HF therapy (e.g. IV diuretics/vasodilators) or ultrafiltration at any one of the following settings: admission with secondary/tertiary diagnosis of HF, emergency department, ambulance, observation unit, urgent care, HF/cardiology clinic, patient's home
  • Willing and able to transmit data via CareLink

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is pregnant
  • Patient has been participating in another study that may interfere with the IDENTIFY-HF protocol required procedures
  • Endstage (Stage D or New York Heart Association class IV) heart failure
  • Asymptomatic (Stage B or New York Heart Association class I) heart failure
  • Severe aortic stenosis or insufficiency
  • Existing insertable cardiac monitor implanted for more than 1 year
  • Existing implantable pulse generator, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy device
  • Severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <25mL/min)
  • Myocardial infarction within prior 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control arm
Subjects in the Control arm will be observed between implant and month 12. During this time, the standard device diagnostic suite will be used as it would normally, in the office using the programmer, or by data transmission from the patient's home (or another remote location). At month 12 through study close (month 18), study doctors for the all subjects will have access to the risk status.
If not previously implanted, a non-experimental insertable cardiac monitor will be implanted to collect information on the patients' heart condition as inputs into the heart failure risk status algorithm (during guided follow-up only, Guided arm: 6-18 months, Control arm: 12-18 months).
Other Names:
  • Reveal XT®

The experimental IDENTIFY-HF Risk Status developed for this study will be used to change standard device data to a heart failure risk status. The risk status and standard device trend data are provided to study doctors for remote management of their patients' heart failure using study specific protocols. The risk status inputs are: night heart rate, heart rate variability, atrial fibrillation burden, ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation, patient activity.

Based on pre-defined thresholds for each of the above inputs, as well as data trends, a heart failure score is derived. The heart failure score is then classified as: "Low", "Medium", "High", or "Very High".

Experimental: Risk Status Guided
Study doctors will have access to the experimental IDENTIFY-HF Risk Status for subjects in the Guided arm between months 6 and 18. At all times during the study, study doctors will also be able to use the standard device diagnostics in the office using the programmer, or by data transmission from the patient's home (or another remote location).
If not previously implanted, a non-experimental insertable cardiac monitor will be implanted to collect information on the patients' heart condition as inputs into the heart failure risk status algorithm (during guided follow-up only, Guided arm: 6-18 months, Control arm: 12-18 months).
Other Names:
  • Reveal XT®

The experimental IDENTIFY-HF Risk Status developed for this study will be used to change standard device data to a heart failure risk status. The risk status and standard device trend data are provided to study doctors for remote management of their patients' heart failure using study specific protocols. The risk status inputs are: night heart rate, heart rate variability, atrial fibrillation burden, ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation, patient activity.

Based on pre-defined thresholds for each of the above inputs, as well as data trends, a heart failure score is derived. The heart failure score is then classified as: "Low", "Medium", "High", or "Very High".

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of Heart Failure Risk Score (HFRS) With Heart Failure Events
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months post-implant (HFRS Guided Arm), 0-12 months (Control Arm)

Evaluate the HFRS Algorithm prior to Heart Failure (HF) related clinical events among patients with HF and documented or suspected AF. Daily HFRS scores were calculated each day for each patient with an implanted Reveal XT device, and the scores were ordinal, with possible values of "Low", "Medium", "High", and "Very High". The objective was to assess the association between the daily scores before and after HF events (HF-related hospitalizations, clinic visits) among subjects experiencing such visits. This would only be done during follow-up periods in which physicians were blinded to the scores (see Time Frame). The score could only be generated if the subject performed a CareLink transmission of their device data during follow-up.

Because of the small number of subjects enrolled, formal statistical analyses were not performed. Subjects were partitioned by whether they (1) experienced a HF event, and (2) whether they experienced a High or Very High HFRS score.

0 to 6 months post-implant (HFRS Guided Arm), 0-12 months (Control Arm)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of HFRS Status With Actions/Testing
Time Frame: 6 to 18 months post-implant (HFRS Guided Arm), 13-18 months (Control Arm)

At scheduled visits in which the HFRS scores were available to clinicians, the scores were summarized, along with whether subjects experienced significant weight gain, high blood pressure, or reported heart failure symptoms.

Because of the small number of subjects randomized, no formal statistical analyses were performed.

6 to 18 months post-implant (HFRS Guided Arm), 13-18 months (Control Arm)
Clinical Status Measures
Time Frame: 0 to 18 months post-implant

Characterize the difference in clinical status measures over time in each arm. Outcomes include Quality of Life (as measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire, in which scores range from 0 (Best) to 105 (Worst), 6 Minute Hall Walk distance, and New York Heart Association (NYHA, ranging from Class I (Best) to Class IV (Worst))

Because of the small number of patients enrolled, formal statistical analyses were not performed and data were not summarized in aggregate.

0 to 18 months post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: IDENTIFY-HF Team, Medtronic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IDENTIFY-HF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Reveal XT® Insertable Cardiac Monitor

Subscribe