Instrumental and Manual Increase of Couch in Neuromuscular Patients (OPTICOUGH)

Instrumental and Manual Increase of Couch in Neuromuscular Patients: Effects of Different Techniques on the Generated Flow

Inefficient cough is responsible of respiratory complications in neuromuscular patients which can lead to hospitalisation and can be life threatening. Techniques enhancing cough efficiency are successful in improving the clearance of bronchial secretions and help non invasive ventilation efficiency especially in case of acute respiratory failure. Combining mechanical exsufflation to the manual techniques of physiotherapy might enhance efficiency. Therefore the investigators want to compare cough efficiency under different techniques of instrumental and manual of cough assistance in order to determine the best combination to optimize cough flow.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis: Cough inefficiency in neuromuscular patients increases morbidity and mortality in case of airway infections and may lead to invasive ventilation. The use of techniques enhancing cough have been successful in improving the success of non invasive ventilation. We want to determine whether adding manual physiotherapist techniques to mechanical exsufflation improve cough efficiency and its ability to clear bronchial secretions.

Objectives: To compare cough flows obtained with different combination of the use of increased inspiratory capacity technique, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation technique and manually applied pressures techniques.

Method:open monocentric cross-over study (the patients are their own controls). Five combinations of cough increase techniques are compared Inclusion criteria: adult neuromuscular patients with a cough inefficiency at a stable state upon inclusion.

As this is a pilot study, 20 patients from the home ventilation unit of the intensive care of the Raymond Poincare teaching hospital (Garches, France) will be included during the usual follow-up of chronic respiratory failure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92380
        • Raymond Poincaré Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients
  • neuromuscular disorders with a respiratory restrictive syndrome (VC < 40% and/or cough flow < 180 L/min and/or Pe max < 40 cmH2O)
  • non invasive ventilation
  • stable respiratory state > 1 month before inclusion
  • signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unstable respiratory state with increased bronchial secretions
  • unstable hemodynamics
  • pneumothorax and or emphysema
  • tracheostomy
  • major bulbar involvement with swallowing dysfunction with the liquids
  • Persons under Guardianship or Trusteeship
  • Pregnant women
  • not covered by the social security system
  • refusal of study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: neuromuscular patients
neuromuscular patients with cough inefficiency in a stable respiratory state upon inclusion
inspiratory capacity is increased with the use of constant pressure device: Alpha 200®
inspiratory capacity is increased with the use of constant pressure device (Alpha 200®) combined with the manual pressures techniques to increase cough by the physiotherapist
increased inspiratory capacity and mechanical exsufflation with the use of insufflation-exsufflation device (Cough Assist®)
increased inspiratory capacity and mechanical exsufflation with the use of insufflation-exsufflation device (Cough Assist®) combined with the manual pressures techniques to increase cough by the physiotherapist
manual pressures techniques to increase cough applied by the physiotherapist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
cough flow obtained from the combination of mechanical and manual cough assistance techniques
Time Frame: 2 Hours
2 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration of efficient cough flow (above 180 l/min)under each cough assistance technique
Time Frame: 2 Hours
2 Hours
respiratory comfort
Time Frame: 2 Hours
evaluation with a visual analogical scale
2 Hours
subjective evaluation of cough efficiency
Time Frame: 2 Hours
evaluation with a visual analogical scale
2 Hours
Respiratory comfort
Time Frame: 2 Hours
evaluation with the Borg dyspnea scale
2 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Frederic LOFASO, MD-PhD, University of Versailles
  • Principal Investigator: Helene Prigent, MD-PhD, University of Versailles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 19, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Alpha 200®

3
Subscribe