- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01519440
Randomized Comparison of Sharp Versus Blunt Techniques at Cesarean
October 21, 2012 updated by: Osman Aşıcıoğlu, Istanbul Bakirkoy Maternity and Children Diseases Hospital
Unintended Extension of the Lower Segment Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery;A Randomized Comparison of Sharp Versus Blunt Techniques
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a specific surgical technique, blunt compared with sharp expansion of the transverse lower uterine incision, is associated with risk of unintended extension of uterine incision
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
1076
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Bakırköy
-
İstanbul, Bakırköy, Turkey, 34274
- İstanbul Bakırköy Maternal and Childrens Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
elective cesarean delivery cases
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Term pregnancy(> 38 weeks of gestation)
- Required elective cesarean delivery
- maternal age between 18-40 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Required emergency cesarean delivery
- Abnormal presentation
- Planned cesarean hysterectomy
- History of low segment vertical uterine incision
- History of classical upper segment uterine incision
- multiple pregnancy
- cases with a high risk for bleeding(HELLP send, preeclampsia, placental insertion anomalies)
- Grand multiparity(parity>5)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
blunt
Blunt expansion of the primary incision was derived by placing the index fingers of the operating surgeon into the incision and pulling the fingers apart laterally and cephalad.
|
sharp
Sharp expansion of the primary incision was developed by cutting laterally and cephalad using bandage scissors
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
unintended extension of uterine incision
Time Frame: during the operation
|
during the operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
intraoperative maternal blood loss
Time Frame: after 48 hours than operation
|
after 48 hours than operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2012
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
February 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 26, 2012
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
January 27, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
October 23, 2012
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 21, 2012
Last Verified
October 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Aşıcıoğlu-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Disruption of Uterine Incision After Cesarean Section
-
Ain Shams Maternity HospitalCompletedEarly Discharge of Patients After Cesarean SectionEgypt
-
Wolfson Medical CenterCompletedComplications After Cesarean Section
-
Uludag UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Wound Disruption | Cesarean Wound; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedEffect of Gum Chewing on Regaining Bowel Motility After Cesarean SectionEgypt
-
HITEC-Institute of Medical SciencesRecruitingVaginal Birth After Cesarean SectionPakistan
-
University of California, San FranciscoEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedPregnancy | Repeat Cesarean Section | Vaginal Births After CesareanUnited States
-
Ahmed M Maged, MDUnknownIntestinal Recovery After Cesarean SectionEgypt
-
Recibio, Inc.Duke UniversityActive, not recruitingPregnancy Related | Cesarean Wound Disruption | Cesarean Section; InfectionUnited States
-
Medical University of ViennaUnknown
-
Ziv HospitalCompleted