- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01531868
Alternative Sensory Presentation Formats in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
A Randomized Trial of Alternative Sensory Presentation Formats in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Background: In a previous study, information verbally presented as relative risk (e.g. "50% less likely") or qualitative risk (e.g. "significantly less likely") resulted in many more people (66%) choosing a surgical procedure for narrowing or artery in the neck than people presented with absolute risk (e.g. "11% versus 5% over 5 years"), annualized risk (e.g. "2% versus 1% per year for 5 years") and event-free survival (e.g. "95% versus 89% over 5 years") (33%).
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine whether the same observations are true for information that is presented visually as a bar graph. In addition, the investigators also seek to determine whether subjects feel that they understand the information better when presented visually as compared with verbally.
Methods: 450 subjects will be approached in the neurology clinic as they are waiting for their office visit. If the subject agrees to participate in this 10 minute study, they will be taken to a quiet room where they will watch a 1 minute video on a laptop. The video will feature an acting physician. The presenter will be the same for all experiment groups. The presenter will describe a hypothetical medical situation in which a narrowing of one of the carotid (neck) arteries is present. The presenter will then describe the risk of a stroke related to that condition if the subject chooses medical therapy versus medical and surgical therapy. The presentation of risk will vary and may be presented in one of 3 different ways including a qualitative description, an absolute risk reduction over a fixed time period, and a relative risk reduction. These three risk groups will be presented either verbally or visually through bar graphs. In the visual subject groups, the presenter will be holding up a graph and remain silent while the graph is shown. The amount of time allotted for the graph on the video will be equal to the amount of time it takes the presenter to say the information in the auditory subject groups. Given that there will be 2 sensory modalities (verbal of visual) and 3 different presentation formats, there will be a total of 6 different videos. After the video is complete, the subject will be asked to complete a 1 page survey which will ask about the patient's age, gender, educational level, reason for the medical visit, and final decision about choice of treatment. The subjects will also answer how well they understood the data by making a mark on a 10 cm horizontal line.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Background: A previous randomized study found that verbal presentation of benefit of surgery in asymptomatic carotid stenosis expressed as qualitative or relative risk resulted in a higher proportion (66% versus 33%) of subjects choosing surgery as compared to subjects presented absolute risk, yearly risk, or event-free survival. Other variables that increased the choice of surgery were male gender, younger age, and higher level of education. Nevertheless, presentation format was the strongest predictor of treatment choice.
Objective/Hypothesis: To determine whether presentation format affects visual representation of information. The investigators hypothesis is that visual representation of both positive and negative outcomes in a single bar graph will result in less subjects favoring surgery as compared to those only shown relative information in a bar graph. The investigators also hypothesize that subjects shown visual information will express a greater understanding of information presented to them as compared to those given verbal information.
Specific Aims: 1) To determine whether presentation format affects visual representation of information. 2) To determine whether subjects given visual representations of information express a greater understanding of the information as compared with subjects given verbal representations of information.
Study Design: 450 subjects will be approached in the neurology clinic as they are waiting for their office visit. Subjects without carotid stenosis will be approached randomly by the principal investigator or one of the co-investigators. They will be asked to participate in the study after completing their office visit with their physician. In the event that the patient is expecting longer than a 30 minute delay to see their physician, they will be asked to participate in the study prior to the office visit. If the subject agrees to participate in this 10 minute study, they will be taken to a quiet room where they will watch a 1 minute video on a laptop. The video will feature an acting physician. The presenter will be the same for all experiment groups. The presenter will describe a hypothetical medical situation in which a narrowing of one of the carotid arteries is present. The presenter will then describe the risk of a stroke related to that condition if the subject chooses medical therapy versus medical and surgical therapy. The presentation of risk will vary and may be presented in one of 3 different ways including a qualitative description, an absolute risk reduction over a fixed time period, and a relative risk reduction. These three risk groups will be presented either verbally or visually through bar graphs. In the visual subject groups, the presenter will be holding up a graph and remain silent while the graph is shown. The amount of time allotted for the graph on the video will be equal to the amount of time it takes the presenter to say the information in the auditory subject groups. Given that there will be 2 sensory modalities (verbal of visual) and 3 different presentation formats, there will be a total of 6 different videos. Randomization will be performed by selecting a video number from an opaque envelope. The subject will be allowed to watch the video up to 3 times, if requested. After the video is complete, the subject will be asked to complete a 1 page survey which will ask about the patient's age, gender, educational level, reason for the medical visit, and final decision about choice of treatment. The subjects will also answer how well they understood the data by making a mark on a 10 cm horizontal line. A mark further to the right signifies better understanding than a mark placed to the left. Data will be entered into a spreadsheet which will then be used to analyze aggregate data.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
- Rhode Island Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or greater
Exclusion Criteria:
- No history or carotid stenosis
- No history of dementia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Auditory qualitative
|
Video of physician
|
Other: Auditory absolute risk
|
Video of physician
|
Other: Auditory relative risk
|
Video of physician
|
Other: Visual qualitative
|
Video of physician
|
Other: Visual relative risk
|
Video of physician
|
Other: Visual absolute risk
|
Video of physician
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Decision to have surgery
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Subjects will complete a survey immediately after watching the video.
The completed surveys will then be analyzed after enrollment is complete.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brian Silver, MD, Rhode Island Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ASPFACS-1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Carotid Stenosis
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRecruitingCarotid Artery Plaque | Carotid Artery Diseases | Carotid Artery Stenosis Asymptomatic | Carotid Artery StenosisGermany
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingChanghai Hospital; Peking Union Medical College Hospital; The Second Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCarotid Artery Stenting | Carotid Endarterectomy | Best Medical Treatment | Carotid Artery Stenosis AsymptomaticChina
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingRadiation-induced Carotid Artery StenosisChina
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneHôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-Franc OuestNot yet recruiting
-
Ochsner Health SystemWithdrawnTCD | Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis | Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis | HITSUnited States
-
University of BolognaActive, not recruiting
-
W.L.Gore & AssociatesCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and other collaboratorsRecruitingCarotid Atherosclerosis | Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis | Carotid Artery AtheromaUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingPatients With Any Degree of Carotid Artery Stenosis and Vulnerable Features in the Carotid Artery PlaqueUnited States
-
Aesculap AGEnrolling by invitationCarotid Artery Stenosis | Iliac Artery Stenosis | Femoral Artery StenosisGermany
Clinical Trials on Video
-
National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.UnknownHIV TestingUnited States
-
Medical College of WisconsinCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalFoundation for Informed Medical Decision MakingCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingDepression | Anxiety | Mobile Phone Use | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | StigmatizationUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder | AutismUnited States
-
Wolfson Medical CenterNot yet recruitingInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn
-
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineActive, not recruiting
-
Singapore Institute of TechnologyCompletedHealthy IndividualsSingapore