- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01554618
Safety and Efficacy Study of Exenatide Once Weekly in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Pleven, Bulgaria, 5800
- Research Site
-
Sevlievo, Bulgaria, 5400
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Baja, Hungary, 6500
- Research Site
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1083
- Research Site
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1023
- Research Site
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1094
- Research Site
-
Szeged, Hungary, 6725
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Beer Sheva, Israel, 84101
- Research Site
-
Haifa, Israel, 31096
- Research Site
-
Ramat Gan, Israel, 5265601
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Kuwait City, Kuwait, 1180
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Aguascalientes, Mexico, 20016
- Research Site
-
Durango, Mexico, 34000
- Research Site
-
Guadalajara, Mexico, 44130
- Research Site
-
Veracruz, Mexico, 91910
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Chernivts?, Ukraine, 58001
- Research Site
-
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76014
- Research Site
-
Kharkiv Region, Ukraine, 61002
- Research Site
-
Odesa, Ukraine, 65031
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90078
- Research Site
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
- Research Site
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- Research Site
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 64111
- Research Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Research Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Research Site
-
-
Mississippi
-
Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216-4505
- Research Site
-
-
New York
-
Buffalo, New York, United States, 14222
- Research Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
- Research Site
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28205
- Research Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
- Research Site
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
- Research Site
-
-
South Dakota
-
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57701
- Research Site
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Research Site
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
- Research Site
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Each patient must meet the following criteria to be enrolled in this study.
- Is a child or an adolescent of 10 to <18 years old, at Visit 1 (Screening)
- Has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus per American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria
- HbA1c of 6.5% to 11.0%, inclusive, in patients not taking insulin/SU, and of 6.5% to 12.0%, inclusive, in patients taking insulin/SU, at Visit 1 (Screening)
- Has a C-peptide of >0.6 ng/L at Visit 1 (Screening)
- Has been treated with diet and exercise alone or in combination with a stable dose of an oral antidiabetic agent (e.g., metformin and/or SU) and/or insulin for their type 2 diabetes for at least 2 months prior to Visit 1 (Screening)
- Has a fasting plasma glucose concentration <280 mg/dL (15.5 mmol/L) at Visit 1 (Screening)
Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study.
Has a clinically significant medical condition that could potentially affect study participation and/or personal well-being, as judged by the Investigator, including but not limited to the following conditions:
- Hepatic disease (defined by aspartate or alanine transaminase >3.0 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Renal disease or serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL (132.6 µmol/L) (males) or 1.4 mg/dL (123.8 µmol/L) (females)
- Gastrointestinal disease deemed significant by the Investigator
- Organ transplantation
- Chronic infection (e.g., tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus)
- Clinically significant malignant disease (with the exception of basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) within 5 years of Visit 1 (Screening)
- Has positive antibody titers to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) or islet cell antigen (ICA512) at Visit 1 (Screening)
- Has a personal or family history of elevated calcitonin, calcitonin >100 ng/L, medullary thyroid carcinoma, or multiple endocrine neoplasia-2
- Has ever used exenatide (exenatide once weekly [exenatide LAR], exenatide BID, BYETTA, or any other formulation) or any glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (e.g., liraglutide [Victoza®])
- Is pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: EQW
Exenatide once weekly
|
2 mg exenatide once weekly
Other Names:
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Placebo once weekly
|
Placebo
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted least square (LS) mean values.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
A mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of study medication.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Percentage of Patients With On-Treatment Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 24, plus up to a maximum of 90 days follow up
|
A controlled assessment period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of study medication up to but not including Week 24 for patients entering the extension period.
For patients not entering the extension period, the period was defined up to and including last dose of study medication + 7 days (+ 90 days for serious AEs [SAEs] and other clinically significant or related AEs).
The Investigator assessed AEs for causal relationship to study drug medication.
|
Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 24, plus up to a maximum of 90 days follow up
|
Percentage of Patients Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Exenatide up to Week 24
Time Frame: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24
|
Percentage of patients positive for ADAs up to Week 24 for the exenatide treatment group is reported.
Baseline was the antibody measurement at Week 0 (Day 1).
A negative or missing antibody measurement was considered negative at baseline.
High positive = antibody titers ≥ 625, including baseline assessment.
Low positive = antibody titers < 625, including baseline assessment.
A patient was said to have treatment-emergent ADA positive at a visit if the antibody test was positive after the first dose of exenatide following a negative or missing antibody measurement, or the titer increased by at least 1 titration category from a detectable measurement prior to first dose of randomized study medication.
|
Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Concentration to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change from baseline in FPG to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change from baseline in body weight to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change from baseline in fasting insulin to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: At Week 24
|
The percentage of patients achieving HbA1c goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported.
A Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) analysis was performed with missing data treated as non-responder, and excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.
|
At Week 24
|
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profiles to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change from baseline in lipid profiles to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as mean values (Standard International [SI] units).
The following lipids were assessed: total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides.
All lipids presented were taken in a fasted state.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change from baseline in SBP and DBP to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24
|
Number of patients needing rescue medication at Week 24 and at each intermediate visit during the controlled assessment period is reported.
Patients with a loss of glycemic control, defined as either an increase from baseline in HbA1c values by ≥ 1.0% at 2 consecutive clinic visits that were at least 1 month apart, or a fasting plasma glucose value ≥ 250 mg/dL or random blood glucose value > 300 mg/dL for 4 days during a 7 day period, received rescue medication.
Data collected after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24
|
Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessments - Beta-Cell Function (HOMA-B) and Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Change from baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S in patients who were not taking insulin to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24
|
Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
Time Frame: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24
|
Percentage of patients reporting injection site reactions at Week 24 and at each intermediate visit during the controlled assessment period is reported.
Injection site reactions were presented from the AE case report form (CRF), based on the "Injection site reactions" higher level term.
A controlled assessment period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of study medication up to but not including Week 24 for patients entering the extension period.
For patients not entering the extension period, the period was defined up to and including last dose of study medication + 7 days (+ 90 days for SAEs and other clinically significant or related AEs).
|
At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change From Baseline in FPG Concentration to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change from baseline in FPG to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change from baseline in body weight to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change from baseline in fasting insulin to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: At Week 52
|
The percentage of patients achieving HbA1c goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
At Week 52
|
Change From Baseline in Lipids Profiles to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change from baseline in lipid profiles to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values (SI units).
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
The following lipids were assessed: total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides.
All lipids presented were taken in a fasted state.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic) to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change from baseline in SBP and DBP to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52
|
Number of patients needing rescue medication at Week 52 and at each intermediate visit during the treatment period is reported.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Patients with a loss of glycemic control, defined as either an increase from baseline in HbA1c values by ≥ 1.0% at 2 consecutive clinic visits that were at least 1 month apart, or a fasting plasma glucose value ≥ 250 mg/dL or random blood glucose value > 300 mg/dL for 4 days during a 7 day period, received rescue medication.
Data collected after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52
|
Change From Baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Change from baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52
|
Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52
|
Percentage of patients reporting injection site reactions at Week 52 and at each intermediate visit among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported.
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Injection site reactions were presented from the AE CRF, based on the "Injection site reactions" higher level term.
An Extension Period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of open-label exenatide to last dose + 7 days (+ 90 days for SAEs and other clinically significant or related AEs).
|
At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52
|
Plasma Exenatide Concentrations to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
Time Frame: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52
|
Geometric mean plasma exenatide concentrations up to Week 52 during the treatment period are reported (for the placebo then exenatide treatment group, only Weeks 24 and 52 were applicable).
The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined.
Data collected after initiation of rescue medication were included.
Data collected after discontinuation of study medication were excluded.
|
Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D5551C00002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment:
https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Children and Adolescent With Type 2 Diabetes
-
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)Universidad Pública de Navarra; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, SpainCompletedOverweight Children With Type 2 Diabetes RiskSpain
-
Corporacion Parc TauliCompletedObesity | Adolescent Obesity | Type 2 Diabetes Treated With InsulinPakistan
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonTerminatedPatient With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin Using a Baseline/Bolus StrategyFrance
-
Ege UniversityCompletedAdolescent | Type 1 Diabetes | ChildrenTurkey
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalChinese Academy of Sciences; The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingEfficacy and Safety of Bifidobacterium Quadruple Live Tablets in Patients With T2DM and ConstipationType 2 Diabetes Mellitus With ComplicationChina
-
Solvay PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
MGC Pharmaceuticals d.o.oNot yet recruitingResistant Epilepsy, Drug | Adolescent Epilepsy | Children Epilepsy | Children and Adolescents With Resistant EpilepsiesIsrael, Slovenia
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedPatients With Type 2 DiabetesKorea, Republic of
-
Vanderbilt UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedAdolescents With Type 2 DiabetesUnited States
-
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.Jaeb Center for Health ResearchRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Treated With InsulinUnited States, Canada
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States