Prontosan Versus Saline in the Cleansing of Chronic Leg Ulcers in Diabetic Patients

July 15, 2013 updated by: B. Braun Medical Inc.

A Randomized, Double-Blind Exploratory Pilot Study Comparing Prontosan(TM) Versus Saline in the Cleansing of Chronic Leg Ulcers in Diabetic Patients

This is a randomized controlled double blinded study involving two (2) investigational sites in the United States. All subjects (n=40) will receive either Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution and Gel treatment or standard of care treatment (0.9% saline) and placebo gel. This is a 12-week study.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92130
        • University of California San Diego
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female diabetic (type I or II) patients ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Diabetic ulcer(s) present for ≥ 4 weeks located below the knee.
  • A total surface area of ≥ 3 cm2 and ≤ 16 cm2.
  • Willingness to wear an off-loading device if medically indicated (e.g., DH shoe or Walker).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by glucose levels >225 mg/dl.
  • HbA1c ≥ 12%.
  • Subjects with a wound infection.
  • Subjects receiving antibiotic therapy within 14 days of enrollment.
  • Subject with history of or clinical evidence of: Cardiac insufficiency (NYHA functional classification IV), angina pectoris (CCS functional classification IV), unstable pulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrine or hematologic disease as determined by the Investigator (serum creatinine of > 3.0; transaminase or alkaline phosphatase levels equal to or greater than 5 times the upper limit) malnutrition (albumin < 2.5 g/dL).
  • Peripheral arterial occlusive disease with a non-palpable pulse on both dorsal pedial and the posterior tibial artery.
  • Presence of gangrene.
  • Active rheumatic or collagen vascular disease (including rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, and systemic lupus erythematosus)
  • Subjects that have been diagnosed with HBV, HVC, AIDS or are HIV positive.
  • Osteomyelitis diagnosed by x-ray, bone biopsy, or other radiological procedure within 90 days prior to Screening Period.
  • Active radiation therapy below the hip.
  • Subject currently receiving, or has received oral or parenteral corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or cytotoxic agents within 30 days prior to Baseline Visit (Visit 1, Week 0) or is anticipated to require such agents during the course of the study.
  • Current participation or participation in another investigational drug or medical device study within the last 30 days.
  • Subjects who test positive for alcohol and or illicit drug use.
  • Subjects who are unable to comprehend or comply with study requirements or ability to sign an informed consent.
  • Subjects, who in the opinion of the Investigator would not be a suitable candidate for this study (reason for exclusion needs to be documented).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Prontosan Solution and Gel
ProntosanTM Wound Irrigation Solution (PHMB 0.1%, Betaine 0.1%) and ProntosanTM Wound Gel (PHMB 0.1%, Betaine 0.1%)
Prontosan(TM) Wound Irrigation Solution (PHMB 0.1%, Betaine 0.1%) and Prontosan(TM) Wound Gel (PHMB 0.1%, Betaine 0.1%). Dressings will be changed and the treatment procedure will be repeated daily with 30ml/40 ml wound solution and 30 ml wound gel for a period of 12 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Double-blind intervetion; Active/placebo comparator unknown.
Placebo Comparator: Saline Solution and Inert Gel
Saline Wound Irrigation Solution and inert Wound Gel. Dressings will be changed and the treatment procedure will be repeated daily with 30ml/40 ml wound solution and 30 ml wound gel for a period of 12 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Double-blind intervetion; Active/placebo comparator unknown.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Relative (%) area wound size change versus baseline in respondents to treatment following a 12-week treatment period
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in absolute wound area dimensions
Time Frame: 12-week treatment period
12-week treatment period
Identification of bacteria present on wound bed at baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: 12-week treatment period
12-week treatment period
Relative change in bacterial load during treatment period
Time Frame: 12-week treatment period
12-week treatment period
Change in wound margins determined by color photography
Time Frame: 12-week treatment period
12-week treatment period
Number of "non-responders" as measured by wound size change (<50% relative wound size reduction
Time Frame: 12-week treatment period
12-week treatment period
Change of clinical wound infection during treatment period
Time Frame: 12-week treatment period
12-week treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William Ennis, DO, University of Illinois Chicago
  • Principal Investigator: Gerit Mulder, DPM, University of California, San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Complications

Clinical Trials on Prontosan

Subscribe